Cargando…

Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning

BACKGROUND: During postgraduate training, considerable efforts for intraprofessional education are in place to prepare primary care residents (PC residents) and medical specialty residents (MS residents) for intraprofessional collaboration (intraPC). Power dynamics are inherently present in such hie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Looman, Natasja, van Woezik, Tamara, van Asselt, Dieneke, Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke, Fluit, Cornelia, de Graaf, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34841565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14706
_version_ 1784751139441344512
author Looman, Natasja
van Woezik, Tamara
van Asselt, Dieneke
Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke
Fluit, Cornelia
de Graaf, Jacqueline
author_facet Looman, Natasja
van Woezik, Tamara
van Asselt, Dieneke
Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke
Fluit, Cornelia
de Graaf, Jacqueline
author_sort Looman, Natasja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During postgraduate training, considerable efforts for intraprofessional education are in place to prepare primary care residents (PC residents) and medical specialty residents (MS residents) for intraprofessional collaboration (intraPC). Power dynamics are inherently present in such hierarchical medical contexts. This affects intraPC (learning). Yet little attention has been paid to factors that impact power dynamics. This study aims to explore power dynamics and their impact on intraPC learning between PC residents and MS residents during hospital placements. METHODS: This study expands on previously published ethnographic research investigating opportunities and barriers for intraPC learning among residents in five Dutch hospitals. We analysed transcripts of observations and in‐depth interviews using template analysis. A critical theory paradigm was employed. Discourse analysis additionally informed the data. RESULTS: We defined five interrelated themes that describe characteristics of power dynamics in intraPC learning during hospital placements: beliefs; power distribution; interaction style; subjection; and fearless learning. Power dynamics operate both within and between the themes: power distribution between PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors seemed to be an attribution affected by underlying beliefs about professional norms or about other professions; beliefs influenced the way PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors interacted; power distribution based on inequity could lead to subjection of PC residents; power distribution based on equity could lead to fearless learning; and open interactions enabled fearless intraPC learning. CONCLUSIONS: Power dynamics have an impact on intraPC learning among residents in hospitals. Constructive power dynamics occur when power distribution is based on equity, combined with sincere open interactions, actively inviting each other into discussions and enlisting the support of MS supervisors to foster fearless learning. This can be achieved by creating awareness of implicit beliefs and making them explicit, recognising interaction that encourages intraPC learning and creating policies that support fearless intraPC learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93001272022-07-21 Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning Looman, Natasja van Woezik, Tamara van Asselt, Dieneke Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke Fluit, Cornelia de Graaf, Jacqueline Med Educ Research Articles BACKGROUND: During postgraduate training, considerable efforts for intraprofessional education are in place to prepare primary care residents (PC residents) and medical specialty residents (MS residents) for intraprofessional collaboration (intraPC). Power dynamics are inherently present in such hierarchical medical contexts. This affects intraPC (learning). Yet little attention has been paid to factors that impact power dynamics. This study aims to explore power dynamics and their impact on intraPC learning between PC residents and MS residents during hospital placements. METHODS: This study expands on previously published ethnographic research investigating opportunities and barriers for intraPC learning among residents in five Dutch hospitals. We analysed transcripts of observations and in‐depth interviews using template analysis. A critical theory paradigm was employed. Discourse analysis additionally informed the data. RESULTS: We defined five interrelated themes that describe characteristics of power dynamics in intraPC learning during hospital placements: beliefs; power distribution; interaction style; subjection; and fearless learning. Power dynamics operate both within and between the themes: power distribution between PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors seemed to be an attribution affected by underlying beliefs about professional norms or about other professions; beliefs influenced the way PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors interacted; power distribution based on inequity could lead to subjection of PC residents; power distribution based on equity could lead to fearless learning; and open interactions enabled fearless intraPC learning. CONCLUSIONS: Power dynamics have an impact on intraPC learning among residents in hospitals. Constructive power dynamics occur when power distribution is based on equity, combined with sincere open interactions, actively inviting each other into discussions and enlisting the support of MS supervisors to foster fearless learning. This can be achieved by creating awareness of implicit beliefs and making them explicit, recognising interaction that encourages intraPC learning and creating policies that support fearless intraPC learning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-13 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9300127/ /pubmed/34841565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14706 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Looman, Natasja
van Woezik, Tamara
van Asselt, Dieneke
Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke
Fluit, Cornelia
de Graaf, Jacqueline
Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
title Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
title_full Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
title_fullStr Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
title_full_unstemmed Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
title_short Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
title_sort exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34841565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14706
work_keys_str_mv AT loomannatasja exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning
AT vanwoeziktamara exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning
AT vanasseltdieneke exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning
AT scherpbierdehaannynke exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning
AT fluitcornelia exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning
AT degraafjacqueline exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning