Cargando…
Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning
BACKGROUND: During postgraduate training, considerable efforts for intraprofessional education are in place to prepare primary care residents (PC residents) and medical specialty residents (MS residents) for intraprofessional collaboration (intraPC). Power dynamics are inherently present in such hie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34841565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14706 |
_version_ | 1784751139441344512 |
---|---|
author | Looman, Natasja van Woezik, Tamara van Asselt, Dieneke Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke Fluit, Cornelia de Graaf, Jacqueline |
author_facet | Looman, Natasja van Woezik, Tamara van Asselt, Dieneke Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke Fluit, Cornelia de Graaf, Jacqueline |
author_sort | Looman, Natasja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During postgraduate training, considerable efforts for intraprofessional education are in place to prepare primary care residents (PC residents) and medical specialty residents (MS residents) for intraprofessional collaboration (intraPC). Power dynamics are inherently present in such hierarchical medical contexts. This affects intraPC (learning). Yet little attention has been paid to factors that impact power dynamics. This study aims to explore power dynamics and their impact on intraPC learning between PC residents and MS residents during hospital placements. METHODS: This study expands on previously published ethnographic research investigating opportunities and barriers for intraPC learning among residents in five Dutch hospitals. We analysed transcripts of observations and in‐depth interviews using template analysis. A critical theory paradigm was employed. Discourse analysis additionally informed the data. RESULTS: We defined five interrelated themes that describe characteristics of power dynamics in intraPC learning during hospital placements: beliefs; power distribution; interaction style; subjection; and fearless learning. Power dynamics operate both within and between the themes: power distribution between PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors seemed to be an attribution affected by underlying beliefs about professional norms or about other professions; beliefs influenced the way PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors interacted; power distribution based on inequity could lead to subjection of PC residents; power distribution based on equity could lead to fearless learning; and open interactions enabled fearless intraPC learning. CONCLUSIONS: Power dynamics have an impact on intraPC learning among residents in hospitals. Constructive power dynamics occur when power distribution is based on equity, combined with sincere open interactions, actively inviting each other into discussions and enlisting the support of MS supervisors to foster fearless learning. This can be achieved by creating awareness of implicit beliefs and making them explicit, recognising interaction that encourages intraPC learning and creating policies that support fearless intraPC learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9300127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93001272022-07-21 Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning Looman, Natasja van Woezik, Tamara van Asselt, Dieneke Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke Fluit, Cornelia de Graaf, Jacqueline Med Educ Research Articles BACKGROUND: During postgraduate training, considerable efforts for intraprofessional education are in place to prepare primary care residents (PC residents) and medical specialty residents (MS residents) for intraprofessional collaboration (intraPC). Power dynamics are inherently present in such hierarchical medical contexts. This affects intraPC (learning). Yet little attention has been paid to factors that impact power dynamics. This study aims to explore power dynamics and their impact on intraPC learning between PC residents and MS residents during hospital placements. METHODS: This study expands on previously published ethnographic research investigating opportunities and barriers for intraPC learning among residents in five Dutch hospitals. We analysed transcripts of observations and in‐depth interviews using template analysis. A critical theory paradigm was employed. Discourse analysis additionally informed the data. RESULTS: We defined five interrelated themes that describe characteristics of power dynamics in intraPC learning during hospital placements: beliefs; power distribution; interaction style; subjection; and fearless learning. Power dynamics operate both within and between the themes: power distribution between PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors seemed to be an attribution affected by underlying beliefs about professional norms or about other professions; beliefs influenced the way PC residents, MS residents and MS supervisors interacted; power distribution based on inequity could lead to subjection of PC residents; power distribution based on equity could lead to fearless learning; and open interactions enabled fearless intraPC learning. CONCLUSIONS: Power dynamics have an impact on intraPC learning among residents in hospitals. Constructive power dynamics occur when power distribution is based on equity, combined with sincere open interactions, actively inviting each other into discussions and enlisting the support of MS supervisors to foster fearless learning. This can be achieved by creating awareness of implicit beliefs and making them explicit, recognising interaction that encourages intraPC learning and creating policies that support fearless intraPC learning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-13 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9300127/ /pubmed/34841565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14706 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Looman, Natasja van Woezik, Tamara van Asselt, Dieneke Scherpbier‐de Haan, Nynke Fluit, Cornelia de Graaf, Jacqueline Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning |
title | Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning |
title_full | Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning |
title_fullStr | Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning |
title_short | Exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning |
title_sort | exploring power dynamics and their impact on intraprofessional learning |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34841565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loomannatasja exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning AT vanwoeziktamara exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning AT vanasseltdieneke exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning AT scherpbierdehaannynke exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning AT fluitcornelia exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning AT degraafjacqueline exploringpowerdynamicsandtheirimpactonintraprofessionallearning |