Cargando…

Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the time between removal of cerclage and delivery, stratified by indication for cerclage placement (elective or non-elective). Additionally, delivery within 72 hours after cerclage removal was compared between elective and non-elective cerclage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adekola, Henry, Addo, Jennifer, Unal, Elizabeth Ramsey, James, Emma, Prakash, Vivek, Abrams, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4277451
_version_ 1784751196820471808
author Adekola, Henry
Addo, Jennifer
Unal, Elizabeth Ramsey
James, Emma
Prakash, Vivek
Abrams, Robert
author_facet Adekola, Henry
Addo, Jennifer
Unal, Elizabeth Ramsey
James, Emma
Prakash, Vivek
Abrams, Robert
author_sort Adekola, Henry
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the time between removal of cerclage and delivery, stratified by indication for cerclage placement (elective or non-elective). Additionally, delivery within 72 hours after cerclage removal was compared between elective and non-elective cerclage placement, as well as between ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage placement. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Participants/Materials, Setting, and Methods. Clinical information of 72 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cerclage over a 4-year period was obtained. Comparisons were made between elective (history-indicated) and non-elective (ultrasound or physical examination-indicated) cerclage placement. Comparisons were also made between physical examination-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. RESULTS: Compared to those who had a non-elective cerclage, women undergoing elective cerclage were more likely to have history of cervical treatment (44% vs. 15%, p = 0.02), and spontaneous preterm delivery (92% vs. 61%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of delivery ≤72 hours following cerclage removal between women who had elective cerclage and those who had non-elective cerclage (46% vs. 58%, p = 0.47). Women who had an elective cerclage were more likely to have elective cerclage removal ≥36 weeks (71.8% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.01), compared to those who had undergone non-elective cerclage. The rate of delivery ≤72 hours following removal of cerclage was greater in women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage compared to women who had ultrasound-indicated cerclage (80% vs. 39%, p = 0.04). Among women who had an elective cerclage, there was no difference in the rate of delivery at ≤72 hours between those who had elective cerclage removal at 36 weeks compared to those electively removed at 37 weeks (31% vs. 58%, p = 0.30). No complications such as fetal demise, iatrogenic amniotic membrane rupture, hemorrhage, or cervical laceration were reported within this cohort. CONCLUSION: Cerclage indication should be considered prior to scheduling elective cerclage removal. Women who had an elective cerclage are most likely to get it electively removed at 36 weeks compared to their counterparts who had a non-elective cerclage. Furthermore, women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage are most likely to deliver within 72 hours of cerclage removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93003652022-07-21 Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience Adekola, Henry Addo, Jennifer Unal, Elizabeth Ramsey James, Emma Prakash, Vivek Abrams, Robert J Pregnancy Research Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the time between removal of cerclage and delivery, stratified by indication for cerclage placement (elective or non-elective). Additionally, delivery within 72 hours after cerclage removal was compared between elective and non-elective cerclage placement, as well as between ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage placement. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Participants/Materials, Setting, and Methods. Clinical information of 72 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cerclage over a 4-year period was obtained. Comparisons were made between elective (history-indicated) and non-elective (ultrasound or physical examination-indicated) cerclage placement. Comparisons were also made between physical examination-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. RESULTS: Compared to those who had a non-elective cerclage, women undergoing elective cerclage were more likely to have history of cervical treatment (44% vs. 15%, p = 0.02), and spontaneous preterm delivery (92% vs. 61%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of delivery ≤72 hours following cerclage removal between women who had elective cerclage and those who had non-elective cerclage (46% vs. 58%, p = 0.47). Women who had an elective cerclage were more likely to have elective cerclage removal ≥36 weeks (71.8% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.01), compared to those who had undergone non-elective cerclage. The rate of delivery ≤72 hours following removal of cerclage was greater in women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage compared to women who had ultrasound-indicated cerclage (80% vs. 39%, p = 0.04). Among women who had an elective cerclage, there was no difference in the rate of delivery at ≤72 hours between those who had elective cerclage removal at 36 weeks compared to those electively removed at 37 weeks (31% vs. 58%, p = 0.30). No complications such as fetal demise, iatrogenic amniotic membrane rupture, hemorrhage, or cervical laceration were reported within this cohort. CONCLUSION: Cerclage indication should be considered prior to scheduling elective cerclage removal. Women who had an elective cerclage are most likely to get it electively removed at 36 weeks compared to their counterparts who had a non-elective cerclage. Furthermore, women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage are most likely to deliver within 72 hours of cerclage removal. Hindawi 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9300365/ /pubmed/35874435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4277451 Text en Copyright © 2022 Henry Adekola et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adekola, Henry
Addo, Jennifer
Unal, Elizabeth Ramsey
James, Emma
Prakash, Vivek
Abrams, Robert
Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience
title Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience
title_full Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience
title_fullStr Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience
title_short Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience
title_sort outcomes following placement and removal of transvaginal cerclage in at risk pregnancies: a single center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4277451
work_keys_str_mv AT adekolahenry outcomesfollowingplacementandremovaloftransvaginalcerclageinatriskpregnanciesasinglecenterexperience
AT addojennifer outcomesfollowingplacementandremovaloftransvaginalcerclageinatriskpregnanciesasinglecenterexperience
AT unalelizabethramsey outcomesfollowingplacementandremovaloftransvaginalcerclageinatriskpregnanciesasinglecenterexperience
AT jamesemma outcomesfollowingplacementandremovaloftransvaginalcerclageinatriskpregnanciesasinglecenterexperience
AT prakashvivek outcomesfollowingplacementandremovaloftransvaginalcerclageinatriskpregnanciesasinglecenterexperience
AT abramsrobert outcomesfollowingplacementandremovaloftransvaginalcerclageinatriskpregnanciesasinglecenterexperience