Cargando…

Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for axillary staging in early node-negative breast cancer (BC) patients in developed countries. However, in resource-constrained developing countries, adoption of SLNB is slow due to logistic issues and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar, Sharma, Himanshu, Priya, Noopur, Saji, Anoop P, Phom, Hamyung Denchu, Sharma, Abhishek, Arun, Indu, Das, Jayanta, Chandra, Aditi, Ahmed, Rosina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2022.1398
_version_ 1784751206646677504
author Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar
Sharma, Himanshu
Priya, Noopur
Saji, Anoop P
Phom, Hamyung Denchu
Sharma, Abhishek
Arun, Indu
Das, Jayanta
Chandra, Aditi
Ahmed, Rosina
author_facet Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar
Sharma, Himanshu
Priya, Noopur
Saji, Anoop P
Phom, Hamyung Denchu
Sharma, Abhishek
Arun, Indu
Das, Jayanta
Chandra, Aditi
Ahmed, Rosina
author_sort Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for axillary staging in early node-negative breast cancer (BC) patients in developed countries. However, in resource-constrained developing countries, adoption of SLNB is slow due to logistic issues and lack of outcome data from non-screened BC cohort. Therefore, we aim to report diagnostic performance, surgical morbidity and survival outcome of SLNB in BC patients from a tertiary care cancer centre in India. METHODOLOGY: 1,521 consecutive early node-negative T1-3N0 BC patients having SLNB from 2011 to 2020 were included in the study. Data were retrieved from the institutional Redcap database and electronic medical records. Analysis was done using Stata14. RESULTS: SLNB was done by dual dye (methylene blue (MB) + radioisotope (RI)/indo cyanine green (ICG)) in 57.7%, MB only in 39.3%, and RI alone in 3% of patients. The identification rate (IR) and SLNB positivity rate were 96% and 27.7%, respectively. IR was highest (98%) with MB + ICG and lowest (94%) with MB alone SLNB. UltraSonoGraphy guided fine needle aspiration cytology of radiological suspicious nodes has significantly reduced the SLNB positivity rate from 34.6% to 26.4% (p < 0.01). One patient had skin necrosis, and 16 had persistent blue staining of the skin in the MB injection site. All were managed conservatively. The lymphedema rate was significantly higher (5.2%) in the ALND versus 0.5% in the SLNB alone patients (p < 0.05). In a median follow up of 27 months, the axillary recurrence rate was 0.04% (4/1,023), and false-negative rate was 0.9% in SLNB negative patients. There were 35 recurrences and 25 deaths in SLNB negative patients, with 10 years predicted disease-free survival of 81% (95% CI 66% to 89%) and overall survival of 79% (95% CI 59% to 90%). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB should be offered as an axillary staging procedure to all eligible BC patients from developing countries to avoid the morbidity associated with ALND. Fluorescent dye can be used as an alternative for RI in a resource-constrained setup.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93004032022-08-01 Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar Sharma, Himanshu Priya, Noopur Saji, Anoop P Phom, Hamyung Denchu Sharma, Abhishek Arun, Indu Das, Jayanta Chandra, Aditi Ahmed, Rosina Ecancermedicalscience Research BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for axillary staging in early node-negative breast cancer (BC) patients in developed countries. However, in resource-constrained developing countries, adoption of SLNB is slow due to logistic issues and lack of outcome data from non-screened BC cohort. Therefore, we aim to report diagnostic performance, surgical morbidity and survival outcome of SLNB in BC patients from a tertiary care cancer centre in India. METHODOLOGY: 1,521 consecutive early node-negative T1-3N0 BC patients having SLNB from 2011 to 2020 were included in the study. Data were retrieved from the institutional Redcap database and electronic medical records. Analysis was done using Stata14. RESULTS: SLNB was done by dual dye (methylene blue (MB) + radioisotope (RI)/indo cyanine green (ICG)) in 57.7%, MB only in 39.3%, and RI alone in 3% of patients. The identification rate (IR) and SLNB positivity rate were 96% and 27.7%, respectively. IR was highest (98%) with MB + ICG and lowest (94%) with MB alone SLNB. UltraSonoGraphy guided fine needle aspiration cytology of radiological suspicious nodes has significantly reduced the SLNB positivity rate from 34.6% to 26.4% (p < 0.01). One patient had skin necrosis, and 16 had persistent blue staining of the skin in the MB injection site. All were managed conservatively. The lymphedema rate was significantly higher (5.2%) in the ALND versus 0.5% in the SLNB alone patients (p < 0.05). In a median follow up of 27 months, the axillary recurrence rate was 0.04% (4/1,023), and false-negative rate was 0.9% in SLNB negative patients. There were 35 recurrences and 25 deaths in SLNB negative patients, with 10 years predicted disease-free survival of 81% (95% CI 66% to 89%) and overall survival of 79% (95% CI 59% to 90%). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB should be offered as an axillary staging procedure to all eligible BC patients from developing countries to avoid the morbidity associated with ALND. Fluorescent dye can be used as an alternative for RI in a resource-constrained setup. Cancer Intelligence 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9300403/ /pubmed/35919228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2022.1398 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar
Sharma, Himanshu
Priya, Noopur
Saji, Anoop P
Phom, Hamyung Denchu
Sharma, Abhishek
Arun, Indu
Das, Jayanta
Chandra, Aditi
Ahmed, Rosina
Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India
title Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India
title_full Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India
title_short Diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in India
title_sort diagnostic performance and survival outcome following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients from a tertiary cancer centre in india
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35919228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2022.1398
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalsanjitkumar diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT sharmahimanshu diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT priyanoopur diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT sajianoopp diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT phomhamyungdenchu diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT sharmaabhishek diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT arunindu diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT dasjayanta diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT chandraaditi diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia
AT ahmedrosina diagnosticperformanceandsurvivaloutcomefollowingsentinellymphnodebiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsfromatertiarycancercentreinindia