Cargando…

Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review

PURPOSE: While calls have been made for exercise to become standard practice in oncology, barriers to implementation in real-world settings are not well described. This systematic scoping review aimed to comprehensively describe barriers impeding integration of exercise into routine oncology care wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Mary A., Bayes, Sara, Newton, Robert U., Zissiadis, Yvonne, Spry, Nigel A., Taaffe, Dennis R., Hart, Nicolas H., Galvão, Daniel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0
_version_ 1784751221846835200
author Kennedy, Mary A.
Bayes, Sara
Newton, Robert U.
Zissiadis, Yvonne
Spry, Nigel A.
Taaffe, Dennis R.
Hart, Nicolas H.
Galvão, Daniel A.
author_facet Kennedy, Mary A.
Bayes, Sara
Newton, Robert U.
Zissiadis, Yvonne
Spry, Nigel A.
Taaffe, Dennis R.
Hart, Nicolas H.
Galvão, Daniel A.
author_sort Kennedy, Mary A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: While calls have been made for exercise to become standard practice in oncology, barriers to implementation in real-world settings are not well described. This systematic scoping review aimed to comprehensively describe barriers impeding integration of exercise into routine oncology care within healthcare systems. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across six electronic databases (since 2010) to identify barriers to implementing exercise into real-world settings. An ecological framework was used to classify barriers according to their respective level within the healthcare system. RESULTS: A total of 1,376 results were retrieved; 50 articles describing implementation barriers in real-world exercise oncology settings were reviewed. Two hundred and forty-three barriers were identified across all levels of the healthcare system. Nearly 40% of barriers existed at the organizational level (n = 93). Lack of structures to support exercise integration and absence of staff/resources to facilitate its delivery were the most common issues reported. Despite the frequency of barriers at the organizational level, organizational stakeholders were largely absent from the research. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing exercise into routine cancer care is hindered by a web of interrelated barriers across all levels of the healthcare system. Organizational barriers are central to most issues. Future work should take an interdisciplinary approach to explore best practices for overcoming implementation barriers, with organizations as a central focus. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This blueprint of implementation barriers highlights critical issues that need to be overcome to ensure people with cancer have access to the therapeutic benefits of exercise during treatment and beyond. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93004852022-07-22 Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Galvão, Daniel A. J Cancer Surviv Review PURPOSE: While calls have been made for exercise to become standard practice in oncology, barriers to implementation in real-world settings are not well described. This systematic scoping review aimed to comprehensively describe barriers impeding integration of exercise into routine oncology care within healthcare systems. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across six electronic databases (since 2010) to identify barriers to implementing exercise into real-world settings. An ecological framework was used to classify barriers according to their respective level within the healthcare system. RESULTS: A total of 1,376 results were retrieved; 50 articles describing implementation barriers in real-world exercise oncology settings were reviewed. Two hundred and forty-three barriers were identified across all levels of the healthcare system. Nearly 40% of barriers existed at the organizational level (n = 93). Lack of structures to support exercise integration and absence of staff/resources to facilitate its delivery were the most common issues reported. Despite the frequency of barriers at the organizational level, organizational stakeholders were largely absent from the research. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing exercise into routine cancer care is hindered by a web of interrelated barriers across all levels of the healthcare system. Organizational barriers are central to most issues. Future work should take an interdisciplinary approach to explore best practices for overcoming implementation barriers, with organizations as a central focus. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This blueprint of implementation barriers highlights critical issues that need to be overcome to ensure people with cancer have access to the therapeutic benefits of exercise during treatment and beyond. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0. Springer US 2021-09-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9300485/ /pubmed/34510366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Kennedy, Mary A.
Bayes, Sara
Newton, Robert U.
Zissiadis, Yvonne
Spry, Nigel A.
Taaffe, Dennis R.
Hart, Nicolas H.
Galvão, Daniel A.
Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
title Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
title_full Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
title_fullStr Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
title_short Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
title_sort implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedymarya implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview
AT bayessara implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview
AT newtonrobertu implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview
AT zissiadisyvonne implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview
AT sprynigela implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview
AT taaffedennisr implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview
AT hartnicolash implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview
AT galvaodaniela implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview