Cargando…
Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review
PURPOSE: While calls have been made for exercise to become standard practice in oncology, barriers to implementation in real-world settings are not well described. This systematic scoping review aimed to comprehensively describe barriers impeding integration of exercise into routine oncology care wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0 |
_version_ | 1784751221846835200 |
---|---|
author | Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Galvão, Daniel A. |
author_facet | Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Galvão, Daniel A. |
author_sort | Kennedy, Mary A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: While calls have been made for exercise to become standard practice in oncology, barriers to implementation in real-world settings are not well described. This systematic scoping review aimed to comprehensively describe barriers impeding integration of exercise into routine oncology care within healthcare systems. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across six electronic databases (since 2010) to identify barriers to implementing exercise into real-world settings. An ecological framework was used to classify barriers according to their respective level within the healthcare system. RESULTS: A total of 1,376 results were retrieved; 50 articles describing implementation barriers in real-world exercise oncology settings were reviewed. Two hundred and forty-three barriers were identified across all levels of the healthcare system. Nearly 40% of barriers existed at the organizational level (n = 93). Lack of structures to support exercise integration and absence of staff/resources to facilitate its delivery were the most common issues reported. Despite the frequency of barriers at the organizational level, organizational stakeholders were largely absent from the research. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing exercise into routine cancer care is hindered by a web of interrelated barriers across all levels of the healthcare system. Organizational barriers are central to most issues. Future work should take an interdisciplinary approach to explore best practices for overcoming implementation barriers, with organizations as a central focus. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This blueprint of implementation barriers highlights critical issues that need to be overcome to ensure people with cancer have access to the therapeutic benefits of exercise during treatment and beyond. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9300485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93004852022-07-22 Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Galvão, Daniel A. J Cancer Surviv Review PURPOSE: While calls have been made for exercise to become standard practice in oncology, barriers to implementation in real-world settings are not well described. This systematic scoping review aimed to comprehensively describe barriers impeding integration of exercise into routine oncology care within healthcare systems. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across six electronic databases (since 2010) to identify barriers to implementing exercise into real-world settings. An ecological framework was used to classify barriers according to their respective level within the healthcare system. RESULTS: A total of 1,376 results were retrieved; 50 articles describing implementation barriers in real-world exercise oncology settings were reviewed. Two hundred and forty-three barriers were identified across all levels of the healthcare system. Nearly 40% of barriers existed at the organizational level (n = 93). Lack of structures to support exercise integration and absence of staff/resources to facilitate its delivery were the most common issues reported. Despite the frequency of barriers at the organizational level, organizational stakeholders were largely absent from the research. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing exercise into routine cancer care is hindered by a web of interrelated barriers across all levels of the healthcare system. Organizational barriers are central to most issues. Future work should take an interdisciplinary approach to explore best practices for overcoming implementation barriers, with organizations as a central focus. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: This blueprint of implementation barriers highlights critical issues that need to be overcome to ensure people with cancer have access to the therapeutic benefits of exercise during treatment and beyond. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0. Springer US 2021-09-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9300485/ /pubmed/34510366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Kennedy, Mary A. Bayes, Sara Newton, Robert U. Zissiadis, Yvonne Spry, Nigel A. Taaffe, Dennis R. Hart, Nicolas H. Galvão, Daniel A. Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review |
title | Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review |
title_full | Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review |
title_fullStr | Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review |
title_short | Implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review |
title_sort | implementation barriers to integrating exercise as medicine in oncology: an ecological scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01080-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennedymarya implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview AT bayessara implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview AT newtonrobertu implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview AT zissiadisyvonne implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview AT sprynigela implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview AT taaffedennisr implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview AT hartnicolash implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview AT galvaodaniela implementationbarrierstointegratingexerciseasmedicineinoncologyanecologicalscopingreview |