Cargando…

Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of forced diuresis as an antiretropulsion strategy during the pneumatic disintegration of solitary lower ureteric stones with semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS). A prospective randomized double-blind study was carried out from March 2019 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shalaby, Essam A., Abdelhalim, Khaled M., Bakr, Mohamed, El-Lilly, Ahmed A., Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01324-3
_version_ 1784751234787311616
author Shalaby, Essam A.
Abdelhalim, Khaled M.
Bakr, Mohamed
El-Lilly, Ahmed A.
Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
author_facet Shalaby, Essam A.
Abdelhalim, Khaled M.
Bakr, Mohamed
El-Lilly, Ahmed A.
Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
author_sort Shalaby, Essam A.
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of forced diuresis as an antiretropulsion strategy during the pneumatic disintegration of solitary lower ureteric stones with semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS). A prospective randomized double-blind study was carried out from March 2019 to June 2021 for patients presented with unilateral solitary radiopaque lower ureteric stones ≤ 20 mm. Patients were randomized for URS into two groups, according to the use of forced diuresis using furosemide 1 mg/kg (GII) or not (GI). Perioperative parameters were compared between both groups, including retropulsion rate, stone-free rate (SFR), and need for auxiliary procedures and complications. A total of 148 patients were included; 72 (48.6%) in GI and 76 in the GII (51.4%), with respective stone size of 11.8 ± 2.6 vs.12.1 ± 2.4 mm. Both groups were comparable in demographic and baseline data, with a mean age of 47 ± 16 and 50 ± 14 years for GI and GII, respectively. GII had a significantly shorter disintegration time (10.5 ± 1.3 vs. 4.2 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.001), shorter operative time (33.1 ± 10.1 vs. 40.8 ± 9.1 min, p < 0.001), lower stone fragments migration rate during disintegration (6.5% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.04), lower retropulsion rate (1.3% vs. 11%, p = 0.02), higher SFR (96.1% vs. 86.1%, p = 0.04), and lower auxiliary procedures (3.9% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.03). Intraoperative and 6-h postoperative changes in heart rate and mean systolic blood pressure were comparable between both groups. Ephedrine injection (6–18 mg) was needed in significantly more GII patients (39.5% vs. 20.8%, p ≤ 0.01). It seems that forced diuresis during pneumatic lithotripsy of the lower ureteric stones is a safe and effective antiretropulsion technique. This would expand the alternative options to the antiretropulsion strategy, especially in centers where the laser and flexible ureteroscopes are not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93005402022-07-22 Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study Shalaby, Essam A. Abdelhalim, Khaled M. Bakr, Mohamed El-Lilly, Ahmed A. Elkoushy, Mohamed A. Urolithiasis Original Article The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of forced diuresis as an antiretropulsion strategy during the pneumatic disintegration of solitary lower ureteric stones with semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS). A prospective randomized double-blind study was carried out from March 2019 to June 2021 for patients presented with unilateral solitary radiopaque lower ureteric stones ≤ 20 mm. Patients were randomized for URS into two groups, according to the use of forced diuresis using furosemide 1 mg/kg (GII) or not (GI). Perioperative parameters were compared between both groups, including retropulsion rate, stone-free rate (SFR), and need for auxiliary procedures and complications. A total of 148 patients were included; 72 (48.6%) in GI and 76 in the GII (51.4%), with respective stone size of 11.8 ± 2.6 vs.12.1 ± 2.4 mm. Both groups were comparable in demographic and baseline data, with a mean age of 47 ± 16 and 50 ± 14 years for GI and GII, respectively. GII had a significantly shorter disintegration time (10.5 ± 1.3 vs. 4.2 ± 2.1 min, p < 0.001), shorter operative time (33.1 ± 10.1 vs. 40.8 ± 9.1 min, p < 0.001), lower stone fragments migration rate during disintegration (6.5% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.04), lower retropulsion rate (1.3% vs. 11%, p = 0.02), higher SFR (96.1% vs. 86.1%, p = 0.04), and lower auxiliary procedures (3.9% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.03). Intraoperative and 6-h postoperative changes in heart rate and mean systolic blood pressure were comparable between both groups. Ephedrine injection (6–18 mg) was needed in significantly more GII patients (39.5% vs. 20.8%, p ≤ 0.01). It seems that forced diuresis during pneumatic lithotripsy of the lower ureteric stones is a safe and effective antiretropulsion technique. This would expand the alternative options to the antiretropulsion strategy, especially in centers where the laser and flexible ureteroscopes are not available. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9300540/ /pubmed/35451636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01324-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Shalaby, Essam A.
Abdelhalim, Khaled M.
Bakr, Mohamed
El-Lilly, Ahmed A.
Elkoushy, Mohamed A.
Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study
title Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study
title_full Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study
title_fullStr Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study
title_short Impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study
title_sort impact of forced diuresis on retropulsion of disintegrated ureteral calculi during semi-rigid ureteroscopy: a double-blind randomized-controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01324-3
work_keys_str_mv AT shalabyessama impactofforceddiuresisonretropulsionofdisintegratedureteralcalculiduringsemirigidureteroscopyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT abdelhalimkhaledm impactofforceddiuresisonretropulsionofdisintegratedureteralcalculiduringsemirigidureteroscopyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT bakrmohamed impactofforceddiuresisonretropulsionofdisintegratedureteralcalculiduringsemirigidureteroscopyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ellillyahmeda impactofforceddiuresisonretropulsionofdisintegratedureteralcalculiduringsemirigidureteroscopyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT elkoushymohameda impactofforceddiuresisonretropulsionofdisintegratedureteralcalculiduringsemirigidureteroscopyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledstudy