Cargando…

Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network

Accurate measurement of the femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) is of great significance for diagnosing hip joint diseases and preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. However, the repeatability of manual measurements is not as satisfactory, and the difference between 2D and 3D measurements is no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhe, Yang, Jiayu, Li, Xinghua, Wang, Kunzheng, Han, Jungang, Yang, Pei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16695-1
_version_ 1784751246435942400
author Li, Zhe
Yang, Jiayu
Li, Xinghua
Wang, Kunzheng
Han, Jungang
Yang, Pei
author_facet Li, Zhe
Yang, Jiayu
Li, Xinghua
Wang, Kunzheng
Han, Jungang
Yang, Pei
author_sort Li, Zhe
collection PubMed
description Accurate measurement of the femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) is of great significance for diagnosing hip joint diseases and preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. However, the repeatability of manual measurements is not as satisfactory, and the difference between 2D and 3D measurements is not clear. The computer-aided method provides a platform for automatic and accurate measurement of the NSA. The femoral point cloud datasets from 310 subjects were segmented into three regions, including the femoral head, femoral neck, and femoral shaft using PointNet++. We created a projection plane to simulate the hip anteroposterior radiograph and fitted the femoral neck axis and femoral shaft axis to complete the 2D measurement, while we directly fitted the two axes in space to complete the 3D measurement. Also, we conducted the manual measurement of the NSA. We verified the accuracy of the segmentation and compared the results of the two automatic and manual methods. The Dice coefficient of femoral segmentation reached 0.9746, and MIoU of that was 0.9165. No significant difference was found between any two of the three methods. While comparing the 2D and 3D methods, the average accuracy was 98.00%, and the average error was 2.58°. This paper proposed two accurate and automatic methods to measure the NSA based on a 2D plane and a 3D model respectively. Although the femoral neck and femoral shaft axes did not intersect in 3D space, the NSAs obtained by 2D and 3D methods were basically consistent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93005762022-07-22 Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network Li, Zhe Yang, Jiayu Li, Xinghua Wang, Kunzheng Han, Jungang Yang, Pei Sci Rep Article Accurate measurement of the femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA) is of great significance for diagnosing hip joint diseases and preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. However, the repeatability of manual measurements is not as satisfactory, and the difference between 2D and 3D measurements is not clear. The computer-aided method provides a platform for automatic and accurate measurement of the NSA. The femoral point cloud datasets from 310 subjects were segmented into three regions, including the femoral head, femoral neck, and femoral shaft using PointNet++. We created a projection plane to simulate the hip anteroposterior radiograph and fitted the femoral neck axis and femoral shaft axis to complete the 2D measurement, while we directly fitted the two axes in space to complete the 3D measurement. Also, we conducted the manual measurement of the NSA. We verified the accuracy of the segmentation and compared the results of the two automatic and manual methods. The Dice coefficient of femoral segmentation reached 0.9746, and MIoU of that was 0.9165. No significant difference was found between any two of the three methods. While comparing the 2D and 3D methods, the average accuracy was 98.00%, and the average error was 2.58°. This paper proposed two accurate and automatic methods to measure the NSA based on a 2D plane and a 3D model respectively. Although the femoral neck and femoral shaft axes did not intersect in 3D space, the NSAs obtained by 2D and 3D methods were basically consistent. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9300576/ /pubmed/35858999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16695-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Li, Zhe
Yang, Jiayu
Li, Xinghua
Wang, Kunzheng
Han, Jungang
Yang, Pei
Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network
title Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network
title_full Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network
title_fullStr Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network
title_short Comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on PointNet++ network
title_sort comparing two different automatic methods to measure femoral neck-shaft angle based on pointnet++ network
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16695-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhe comparingtwodifferentautomaticmethodstomeasurefemoralneckshaftanglebasedonpointnetnetwork
AT yangjiayu comparingtwodifferentautomaticmethodstomeasurefemoralneckshaftanglebasedonpointnetnetwork
AT lixinghua comparingtwodifferentautomaticmethodstomeasurefemoralneckshaftanglebasedonpointnetnetwork
AT wangkunzheng comparingtwodifferentautomaticmethodstomeasurefemoralneckshaftanglebasedonpointnetnetwork
AT hanjungang comparingtwodifferentautomaticmethodstomeasurefemoralneckshaftanglebasedonpointnetnetwork
AT yangpei comparingtwodifferentautomaticmethodstomeasurefemoralneckshaftanglebasedonpointnetnetwork