Cargando…

Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience

This study aimed to assess the potential impact of implementing an electronic alert system (EAS) for systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis in pediatric patients mortality. This retrospective study had a pre and post design. We enrolled patients aged ≤ 14 years who were diagnosed with seps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alturki, Abdullah, Al-Eyadhy, Ayman, Alfayez, Ali, Bendahmash, Abdulrahman, Aljofan, Fahad, Alanzi, Fawaz, Alsubaie, Hadeel, Alabdulsalam, Moath, Alayed, Tareq, Alofisan, Tariq, Alnajem, Afnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16632-2
_version_ 1784751260951379968
author Alturki, Abdullah
Al-Eyadhy, Ayman
Alfayez, Ali
Bendahmash, Abdulrahman
Aljofan, Fahad
Alanzi, Fawaz
Alsubaie, Hadeel
Alabdulsalam, Moath
Alayed, Tareq
Alofisan, Tariq
Alnajem, Afnan
author_facet Alturki, Abdullah
Al-Eyadhy, Ayman
Alfayez, Ali
Bendahmash, Abdulrahman
Aljofan, Fahad
Alanzi, Fawaz
Alsubaie, Hadeel
Alabdulsalam, Moath
Alayed, Tareq
Alofisan, Tariq
Alnajem, Afnan
author_sort Alturki, Abdullah
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to assess the potential impact of implementing an electronic alert system (EAS) for systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis in pediatric patients mortality. This retrospective study had a pre and post design. We enrolled patients aged ≤ 14 years who were diagnosed with sepsis/severe sepsis upon admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of our tertiary hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. We implemented an EAS for the patients with SIRS/sepsis. The patients who met the inclusion criteria pre-EAS implementation comprised the control group, and the group post-EAS implementation was the experimental group. Mortality was the primary outcome, while length of stay (LOS) and mechanical ventilation in the first hour were the secondary outcomes. Of the 308 enrolled patients, 147 were in the pre-EAS group and 161 in the post-EAS group. In terms of mortality, 44 patients in the pre-EAS group and 28 in the post-EAS group died (p 0.011). The average LOS in the PICU was 7.9 days for the pre-EAS group and 6.8 days for the post-EAS group (p 0.442). Considering the EAS initiation time as the “zero time”, early recognition of SIRS and sepsis via the EAS led to faster treatment interventions in post-EAS group, which included fluid boluses with median (25th, 75th percentile) time of 107 (37, 218) min vs. 30 (11,112) min, p < 0.001) and time to initiate antimicrobial therapy median (25th, 75th percentile) of 170.5 (66,320) min vs. 131 (53,279) min, p 0.042). The difference in mechanical ventilation in the first hour of admission was not significant between the groups (25.17% vs. 24.22%, p 0.895). The implementation of the EAS resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the mortality rate among the patients admitted to the PICU in our study. An EAS can play an important role in saving lives and subsequent reduction in healthcare costs. Further enhancement of systematic screening is therefore highly recommended to improve the prognosis of pediatric SIRS and sepsis. The implementation of the EAS, warrants further validation in multicenter or national studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93006362022-07-22 Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience Alturki, Abdullah Al-Eyadhy, Ayman Alfayez, Ali Bendahmash, Abdulrahman Aljofan, Fahad Alanzi, Fawaz Alsubaie, Hadeel Alabdulsalam, Moath Alayed, Tareq Alofisan, Tariq Alnajem, Afnan Sci Rep Article This study aimed to assess the potential impact of implementing an electronic alert system (EAS) for systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis in pediatric patients mortality. This retrospective study had a pre and post design. We enrolled patients aged ≤ 14 years who were diagnosed with sepsis/severe sepsis upon admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of our tertiary hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. We implemented an EAS for the patients with SIRS/sepsis. The patients who met the inclusion criteria pre-EAS implementation comprised the control group, and the group post-EAS implementation was the experimental group. Mortality was the primary outcome, while length of stay (LOS) and mechanical ventilation in the first hour were the secondary outcomes. Of the 308 enrolled patients, 147 were in the pre-EAS group and 161 in the post-EAS group. In terms of mortality, 44 patients in the pre-EAS group and 28 in the post-EAS group died (p 0.011). The average LOS in the PICU was 7.9 days for the pre-EAS group and 6.8 days for the post-EAS group (p 0.442). Considering the EAS initiation time as the “zero time”, early recognition of SIRS and sepsis via the EAS led to faster treatment interventions in post-EAS group, which included fluid boluses with median (25th, 75th percentile) time of 107 (37, 218) min vs. 30 (11,112) min, p < 0.001) and time to initiate antimicrobial therapy median (25th, 75th percentile) of 170.5 (66,320) min vs. 131 (53,279) min, p 0.042). The difference in mechanical ventilation in the first hour of admission was not significant between the groups (25.17% vs. 24.22%, p 0.895). The implementation of the EAS resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the mortality rate among the patients admitted to the PICU in our study. An EAS can play an important role in saving lives and subsequent reduction in healthcare costs. Further enhancement of systematic screening is therefore highly recommended to improve the prognosis of pediatric SIRS and sepsis. The implementation of the EAS, warrants further validation in multicenter or national studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9300636/ /pubmed/35859000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16632-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Alturki, Abdullah
Al-Eyadhy, Ayman
Alfayez, Ali
Bendahmash, Abdulrahman
Aljofan, Fahad
Alanzi, Fawaz
Alsubaie, Hadeel
Alabdulsalam, Moath
Alayed, Tareq
Alofisan, Tariq
Alnajem, Afnan
Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience
title Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience
title_full Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience
title_fullStr Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience
title_short Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience
title_sort impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16632-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alturkiabdullah impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT aleyadhyayman impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT alfayezali impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT bendahmashabdulrahman impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT aljofanfahad impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT alanzifawaz impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT alsubaiehadeel impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT alabdulsalammoath impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT alayedtareq impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT alofisantariq impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience
AT alnajemafnan impactofanelectronicalertsystemforpediatricsepsisscreeningatertiaryhospitalexperience