Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Capecitabine, as a novel adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBCs, remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899423 |
_version_ | 1784751324496134144 |
---|---|
author | Xun, Xueqiong Cao, Qinguang Hong, Pan Rai, Saroj Zhou, Yeming Liu, Ruikang Hu, Huiyong |
author_facet | Xun, Xueqiong Cao, Qinguang Hong, Pan Rai, Saroj Zhou, Yeming Liu, Ruikang Hu, Huiyong |
author_sort | Xun, Xueqiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Capecitabine, as a novel adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBCs, remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of capecitabine for early-stage TNBCs combined with neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases updated on Mar 18, 2022 for relevant RCTs. In all, 11 RCTs with 5,175 patients were included. We used hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) to assess the differences between disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated significance differences in both DFS and OS (DFS: HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.68–0.86; OS: HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.85). In subgroup analysis, the lower dosage group showed higher DFS (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.69–0.91), higher frequency (HR=0.72, 95%CI 0.62–0.83), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84). However, capecitabine was also associated with a higher risk of diarrhea (OR=3.10, 95% CI 2.32–4.15), hand–foot syndrome (OR=25.79, 95% CI 15.32–43.42), and leukopenia (OR=2.08, 95% CI 1.13–3.84). CONCLUSION: The addition of capecitabine to early-stage TNBC patients receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy showed significant DFS and OS improvement with tolerable adverse events. The lower dosage and higher frequency of capecitabine combined with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a better survival outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9300946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93009462022-07-22 Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Xun, Xueqiong Cao, Qinguang Hong, Pan Rai, Saroj Zhou, Yeming Liu, Ruikang Hu, Huiyong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Capecitabine, as a novel adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBCs, remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of capecitabine for early-stage TNBCs combined with neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases updated on Mar 18, 2022 for relevant RCTs. In all, 11 RCTs with 5,175 patients were included. We used hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) to assess the differences between disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated significance differences in both DFS and OS (DFS: HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.68–0.86; OS: HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.85). In subgroup analysis, the lower dosage group showed higher DFS (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.69–0.91), higher frequency (HR=0.72, 95%CI 0.62–0.83), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84). However, capecitabine was also associated with a higher risk of diarrhea (OR=3.10, 95% CI 2.32–4.15), hand–foot syndrome (OR=25.79, 95% CI 15.32–43.42), and leukopenia (OR=2.08, 95% CI 1.13–3.84). CONCLUSION: The addition of capecitabine to early-stage TNBC patients receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy showed significant DFS and OS improvement with tolerable adverse events. The lower dosage and higher frequency of capecitabine combined with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a better survival outcome. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9300946/ /pubmed/35875141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899423 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xun, Cao, Hong, Rai, Zhou, Liu and Hu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Xun, Xueqiong Cao, Qinguang Hong, Pan Rai, Saroj Zhou, Yeming Liu, Ruikang Hu, Huiyong Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of capecitabine for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xunxueqiong efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis AT caoqinguang efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis AT hongpan efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis AT raisaroj efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis AT zhouyeming efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis AT liuruikang efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis AT huhuiyong efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis |