Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Capecitabine, as a novel adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBCs, remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xun, Xueqiong, Cao, Qinguang, Hong, Pan, Rai, Saroj, Zhou, Yeming, Liu, Ruikang, Hu, Huiyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899423
_version_ 1784751324496134144
author Xun, Xueqiong
Cao, Qinguang
Hong, Pan
Rai, Saroj
Zhou, Yeming
Liu, Ruikang
Hu, Huiyong
author_facet Xun, Xueqiong
Cao, Qinguang
Hong, Pan
Rai, Saroj
Zhou, Yeming
Liu, Ruikang
Hu, Huiyong
author_sort Xun, Xueqiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Capecitabine, as a novel adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBCs, remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of capecitabine for early-stage TNBCs combined with neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases updated on Mar 18, 2022 for relevant RCTs. In all, 11 RCTs with 5,175 patients were included. We used hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) to assess the differences between disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated significance differences in both DFS and OS (DFS: HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.68–0.86; OS: HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.85). In subgroup analysis, the lower dosage group showed higher DFS (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.69–0.91), higher frequency (HR=0.72, 95%CI 0.62–0.83), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84). However, capecitabine was also associated with a higher risk of diarrhea (OR=3.10, 95% CI 2.32–4.15), hand–foot syndrome (OR=25.79, 95% CI 15.32–43.42), and leukopenia (OR=2.08, 95% CI 1.13–3.84). CONCLUSION: The addition of capecitabine to early-stage TNBC patients receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy showed significant DFS and OS improvement with tolerable adverse events. The lower dosage and higher frequency of capecitabine combined with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a better survival outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9300946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93009462022-07-22 Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Xun, Xueqiong Cao, Qinguang Hong, Pan Rai, Saroj Zhou, Yeming Liu, Ruikang Hu, Huiyong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Capecitabine, as a novel adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBCs, remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of capecitabine for early-stage TNBCs combined with neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases updated on Mar 18, 2022 for relevant RCTs. In all, 11 RCTs with 5,175 patients were included. We used hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) to assess the differences between disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated significance differences in both DFS and OS (DFS: HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.68–0.86; OS: HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.85). In subgroup analysis, the lower dosage group showed higher DFS (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.69–0.91), higher frequency (HR=0.72, 95%CI 0.62–0.83), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84). However, capecitabine was also associated with a higher risk of diarrhea (OR=3.10, 95% CI 2.32–4.15), hand–foot syndrome (OR=25.79, 95% CI 15.32–43.42), and leukopenia (OR=2.08, 95% CI 1.13–3.84). CONCLUSION: The addition of capecitabine to early-stage TNBC patients receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy showed significant DFS and OS improvement with tolerable adverse events. The lower dosage and higher frequency of capecitabine combined with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a better survival outcome. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9300946/ /pubmed/35875141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899423 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xun, Cao, Hong, Rai, Zhou, Liu and Hu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xun, Xueqiong
Cao, Qinguang
Hong, Pan
Rai, Saroj
Zhou, Yeming
Liu, Ruikang
Hu, Huiyong
Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of capecitabine for triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9300946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35875141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899423
work_keys_str_mv AT xunxueqiong efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT caoqinguang efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT hongpan efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT raisaroj efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT zhouyeming efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT liuruikang efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis
AT huhuiyong efficacyandsafetyofcapecitabinefortriplenegativebreastcancerametaanalysis