Cross-sectional Area Ratio of Median-to-Ulnar and Median-to-Superficial Radial Nerve at the Wrist for Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic properties for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) of the median-to-ulnar cross-sectional area ratio (MUR) and the median-to-superficial radial cross-sectional area ratio (MRR). METHODS: A case–control study was conducted. A physiatrist, blinded to the CTS status of the subjects, assessed the cross-sectional area of the median nerve (CSA-m), MUR, and MRR at the distal wrist crease for the CTS and control groups. The relationship of CSA-m, MUR, and MRR with CTS severity was tested using Spearman’s correlation. The overall diagnostic accuracy was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The cut-off values to diagnose CTS were chosen to achieve similar values for sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: There were 32 hands in the CTS group and 33 hands in the control group. The correlations of CSA-m, MUR, and MRR with CTS severity were 0.66, 0.56, and 0.34, respectively. The AUCs of CSA-m, MUR, and MRR were 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77–0.95), 0.79 (0.69–0.90), and 0.69 (0.56–0.82), respectively. The cut-off values of CSA-m, MUR, and MRR were 12 mm(2) (sensitivity, 81.3%; specificity, 81.8%), 2.6 (sensitivity, 68.8%; specificity, 69.7%), and 10 (sensitivity, 65.6%; specificity, 63.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: : MUR and MRR had acceptable diagnostic abilities but did not show superiority over CSA-m for CTS diagnosis.