Cargando…

Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE: To explore how therapists and clients act dyadically to establish a therapeutic relationship during the first five sessions of psychotherapy. The study aimed to identify both relational facilitative and hindering processes occurring in routine care. METHODS: Using the method ‘interpersona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavik, Kristina Osland, McAleavey, Andrew Athan, Kvendseth, Eli Karoline, Moltu, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915932
_version_ 1784751418852245504
author Lavik, Kristina Osland
McAleavey, Andrew Athan
Kvendseth, Eli Karoline
Moltu, Christian
author_facet Lavik, Kristina Osland
McAleavey, Andrew Athan
Kvendseth, Eli Karoline
Moltu, Christian
author_sort Lavik, Kristina Osland
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore how therapists and clients act dyadically to establish a therapeutic relationship during the first five sessions of psychotherapy. The study aimed to identify both relational facilitative and hindering processes occurring in routine care. METHODS: Using the method ‘interpersonal process recall’ (IPR), we videotaped the third and fifth session of 12 psychotherapy dyads, and conducted video-assisted interviews with each therapist and client separately. In total, the data material consist of 47 IPR interviews. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: The analysis process revealed two main groups. The first group consisted of dyads with a positive relational outcome, and the second group consisted of dyads with a troubled or frail relational outcome. During the initial phase of therapy, clients described feeling overwhelmed by fear and shame. Positive relational development occurred when these emotions were successfully accommodated and replaced with a growing sense of safety with the therapist. However, the relationship became troubled when the client experienced an increase in shame and/or fear during the first sessions. When forming a therapeutic relationship, it is vital that the client experience the therapist as genuine and skilled, and that the therapist is able to engage and connect deeply with the client on a person-to-person level. The article further provides a discussion on how these dyadic experiences align with the working alliance and real relationship, and how the two consolidate during the first sessions of psychotherapy. CONCLUSION: The current study explored the complex relational processes underlying the formation of the therapeutic relationship. Core aspects of the real relationship are prerequisites to forming a collaborative working alliance in which both therapist and client are actively engaged. Facilitating a positive relationship is crucial in the early phase of psychotherapy, and therapists can actively identify and repair ruptures at this time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9301379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93013792022-07-22 Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study Lavik, Kristina Osland McAleavey, Andrew Athan Kvendseth, Eli Karoline Moltu, Christian Front Psychol Psychology OBJECTIVE: To explore how therapists and clients act dyadically to establish a therapeutic relationship during the first five sessions of psychotherapy. The study aimed to identify both relational facilitative and hindering processes occurring in routine care. METHODS: Using the method ‘interpersonal process recall’ (IPR), we videotaped the third and fifth session of 12 psychotherapy dyads, and conducted video-assisted interviews with each therapist and client separately. In total, the data material consist of 47 IPR interviews. Data were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: The analysis process revealed two main groups. The first group consisted of dyads with a positive relational outcome, and the second group consisted of dyads with a troubled or frail relational outcome. During the initial phase of therapy, clients described feeling overwhelmed by fear and shame. Positive relational development occurred when these emotions were successfully accommodated and replaced with a growing sense of safety with the therapist. However, the relationship became troubled when the client experienced an increase in shame and/or fear during the first sessions. When forming a therapeutic relationship, it is vital that the client experience the therapist as genuine and skilled, and that the therapist is able to engage and connect deeply with the client on a person-to-person level. The article further provides a discussion on how these dyadic experiences align with the working alliance and real relationship, and how the two consolidate during the first sessions of psychotherapy. CONCLUSION: The current study explored the complex relational processes underlying the formation of the therapeutic relationship. Core aspects of the real relationship are prerequisites to forming a collaborative working alliance in which both therapist and client are actively engaged. Facilitating a positive relationship is crucial in the early phase of psychotherapy, and therapists can actively identify and repair ruptures at this time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9301379/ /pubmed/35874376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915932 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lavik, McAleavey, Kvendseth and Moltu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lavik, Kristina Osland
McAleavey, Andrew Athan
Kvendseth, Eli Karoline
Moltu, Christian
Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study
title Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study
title_full Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study
title_short Relationship and Alliance Formation Processes in Psychotherapy: A Dual-Perspective Qualitative Study
title_sort relationship and alliance formation processes in psychotherapy: a dual-perspective qualitative study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915932
work_keys_str_mv AT lavikkristinaosland relationshipandallianceformationprocessesinpsychotherapyadualperspectivequalitativestudy
AT mcaleaveyandrewathan relationshipandallianceformationprocessesinpsychotherapyadualperspectivequalitativestudy
AT kvendsethelikaroline relationshipandallianceformationprocessesinpsychotherapyadualperspectivequalitativestudy
AT moltuchristian relationshipandallianceformationprocessesinpsychotherapyadualperspectivequalitativestudy