Cargando…

Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model

PURPOSE: To compare two platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation methods (double spin (D-PRP) and TriCell PRP (T-PRP)) for eye drops, concentration yields of platelets and other cells, release of growth factors, and efficacy of the de-epithelization rabbit model. METHODS: PRP was extracted by D-PRP an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Tatsuhiko, Suzuki, Takashi, Saito, Tomohiko, Itokawa, Takashi, Hori, Yuichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35873527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6634744
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare two platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation methods (double spin (D-PRP) and TriCell PRP (T-PRP)) for eye drops, concentration yields of platelets and other cells, release of growth factors, and efficacy of the de-epithelization rabbit model. METHODS: PRP was extracted by D-PRP and T-PRP from 30 ml blood from healthy adults. After extraction, platelets and leukocytes were counted. D-PRP and T-PRP were preserved during A: 1 h storage at room temperature, B: 1 h storage at −20°C, C: 24 h storage at 4°C, and D: 24 h storage at −20°C. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) was measured. Freezing/thawing PRP eye drops and control were instilled in the de-epithelization rabbit model four times per day for 5 days. Histology was compared between eyes treated with control, D-PRP, and T-PRP. RESULTS: 14 ml of D-PRP and 4 ml of T-PRP were extracted from 30 ml whole blood samples. D-PRP and T-PRP had 41.36 ± 8.43 × 10(4) and 67.02 ± 13.55 × 10(4) platelets and 0.41 ± 0.24 × 10(3)/ml and 10.09 ± 4.29 × 10(3)/ml leucocytes, respectively. In the four storage methods, PDGF concentrations in T-PRP were higher than those in D-PRP eye drops. Freezing/thawing D-PRP and T-PRP increased PDGF concentrations. Histology showed corneal epithelium thickness in T-PRP-treated eyes after healing (38.41 ± 9.10 μm) was significantly higher than that in control-treated (27.77 ± 4.76 μm) and D-PRP-treated eyes (18.32 ± 3.14 μm) (P < 0.05). There was no corneal damage with inflammation in corneal stroma and epithelium of all tested groups. Electron microscopy revealed strong adhesion between cell junctions in T-PRP-treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Freezing/thawing of PRP extracted with the T-PRP kit may result in high platelet and leukocyte concentration and produce high PDGF concentration. PRP eye drops including leucocytes could increase thickness of corneal epithelium without corneal inflammation.