Cargando…
Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442 |
_version_ | 1784751497861398528 |
---|---|
author | Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Li, Winny Martel, Guillaume Jouhair, Eva Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Petrosoniak, Andrew Emond, Marcel |
author_facet | Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Li, Winny Martel, Guillaume Jouhair, Eva Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Petrosoniak, Andrew Emond, Marcel |
author_sort | Truchot, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medicine. INFORMATION SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. RESULTS: A total of 4077 records were identified by our search strategy and 2476 abstracts were screened. One hundred and thirty full articles were reviewed and 81 full articles were included. Only 33 studies (40%) assessed safety-related issues, among which 11 chose a safety-related primary outcome. Latent safety threats (LSTs) assessment was conducted in 24 studies (30%) and the cancellation rate was described in 9 studies (11%). The possible negative impact of ISS on real ED patients was assessed in two studies (2.5%), through a questionnaire and not through patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most studies use ISS for systems-based or education-based applications. Patient safety during ISS is often evaluated in the context of identifying or mitigating LSTs and rarely on the potential impact and risks to patients simultaneously receiving care in the ED. Our scoping review identified knowledge gaps related to the safe conduct of ISS in the ED, which may warrant further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9301797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93017972022-08-11 Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Li, Winny Martel, Guillaume Jouhair, Eva Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Petrosoniak, Andrew Emond, Marcel BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medicine. INFORMATION SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. RESULTS: A total of 4077 records were identified by our search strategy and 2476 abstracts were screened. One hundred and thirty full articles were reviewed and 81 full articles were included. Only 33 studies (40%) assessed safety-related issues, among which 11 chose a safety-related primary outcome. Latent safety threats (LSTs) assessment was conducted in 24 studies (30%) and the cancellation rate was described in 9 studies (11%). The possible negative impact of ISS on real ED patients was assessed in two studies (2.5%), through a questionnaire and not through patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most studies use ISS for systems-based or education-based applications. Patient safety during ISS is often evaluated in the context of identifying or mitigating LSTs and rarely on the potential impact and risks to patients simultaneously receiving care in the ED. Our scoping review identified knowledge gaps related to the safe conduct of ISS in the ED, which may warrant further investigation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9301797/ /pubmed/36219737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Li, Winny Martel, Guillaume Jouhair, Eva Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Petrosoniak, Andrew Emond, Marcel Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review |
title | Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review |
title_full | Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review |
title_short | Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review |
title_sort | is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? a scoping review |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT truchotjennifer isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview AT bouchervalerie isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview AT liwinny isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview AT martelguillaume isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview AT jouhaireva isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview AT raymonddufresneeliane isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview AT petrosoniakandrew isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview AT emondmarcel isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview |