Cargando…

Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truchot, Jennifer, Boucher, Valérie, Li, Winny, Martel, Guillaume, Jouhair, Eva, Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane, Petrosoniak, Andrew, Emond, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442
_version_ 1784751497861398528
author Truchot, Jennifer
Boucher, Valérie
Li, Winny
Martel, Guillaume
Jouhair, Eva
Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane
Petrosoniak, Andrew
Emond, Marcel
author_facet Truchot, Jennifer
Boucher, Valérie
Li, Winny
Martel, Guillaume
Jouhair, Eva
Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane
Petrosoniak, Andrew
Emond, Marcel
author_sort Truchot, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medicine. INFORMATION SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. RESULTS: A total of 4077 records were identified by our search strategy and 2476 abstracts were screened. One hundred and thirty full articles were reviewed and 81 full articles were included. Only 33 studies (40%) assessed safety-related issues, among which 11 chose a safety-related primary outcome. Latent safety threats (LSTs) assessment was conducted in 24 studies (30%) and the cancellation rate was described in 9 studies (11%). The possible negative impact of ISS on real ED patients was assessed in two studies (2.5%), through a questionnaire and not through patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most studies use ISS for systems-based or education-based applications. Patient safety during ISS is often evaluated in the context of identifying or mitigating LSTs and rarely on the potential impact and risks to patients simultaneously receiving care in the ED. Our scoping review identified knowledge gaps related to the safe conduct of ISS in the ED, which may warrant further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9301797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93017972022-08-11 Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review Truchot, Jennifer Boucher, Valérie Li, Winny Martel, Guillaume Jouhair, Eva Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane Petrosoniak, Andrew Emond, Marcel BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the safety of in situ simulation (ISS) in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Original articles published before March 2021 were included if they investigated the use of ISS in the field of emergency medicine. INFORMATION SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science. RESULTS: A total of 4077 records were identified by our search strategy and 2476 abstracts were screened. One hundred and thirty full articles were reviewed and 81 full articles were included. Only 33 studies (40%) assessed safety-related issues, among which 11 chose a safety-related primary outcome. Latent safety threats (LSTs) assessment was conducted in 24 studies (30%) and the cancellation rate was described in 9 studies (11%). The possible negative impact of ISS on real ED patients was assessed in two studies (2.5%), through a questionnaire and not through patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most studies use ISS for systems-based or education-based applications. Patient safety during ISS is often evaluated in the context of identifying or mitigating LSTs and rarely on the potential impact and risks to patients simultaneously receiving care in the ED. Our scoping review identified knowledge gaps related to the safe conduct of ISS in the ED, which may warrant further investigation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9301797/ /pubmed/36219737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Truchot, Jennifer
Boucher, Valérie
Li, Winny
Martel, Guillaume
Jouhair, Eva
Raymond-Dufresne, Éliane
Petrosoniak, Andrew
Emond, Marcel
Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_full Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_fullStr Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_short Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review
title_sort is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? a scoping review
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059442
work_keys_str_mv AT truchotjennifer isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT bouchervalerie isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT liwinny isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT martelguillaume isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT jouhaireva isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT raymonddufresneeliane isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT petrosoniakandrew isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview
AT emondmarcel isinsitusimulationinemergencymedicinesafeascopingreview