Cargando…

Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram

AIMS: Atrial flutter (AFlut) is a common re-entrant atrial tachycardia driven by self-sustainable mechanisms that cause excitations to propagate along pathways different from sinus rhythm. Intra-cardiac electrophysiological mapping and catheter ablation are often performed without detailed prior kno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luongo, Giorgio, Vacanti, Gaetano, Nitzke, Vincent, Nairn, Deborah, Nagel, Claudia, Kabiri, Diba, Almeida, Tiago P, Soriano, Diogo C, Rivolta, Massimo W, Ng, Ghulam André, Dössel, Olaf, Luik, Armin, Sassi, Roberto, Schmitt, Claus, Loewe, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab322
_version_ 1784751534550024192
author Luongo, Giorgio
Vacanti, Gaetano
Nitzke, Vincent
Nairn, Deborah
Nagel, Claudia
Kabiri, Diba
Almeida, Tiago P
Soriano, Diogo C
Rivolta, Massimo W
Ng, Ghulam André
Dössel, Olaf
Luik, Armin
Sassi, Roberto
Schmitt, Claus
Loewe, Axel
author_facet Luongo, Giorgio
Vacanti, Gaetano
Nitzke, Vincent
Nairn, Deborah
Nagel, Claudia
Kabiri, Diba
Almeida, Tiago P
Soriano, Diogo C
Rivolta, Massimo W
Ng, Ghulam André
Dössel, Olaf
Luik, Armin
Sassi, Roberto
Schmitt, Claus
Loewe, Axel
author_sort Luongo, Giorgio
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Atrial flutter (AFlut) is a common re-entrant atrial tachycardia driven by self-sustainable mechanisms that cause excitations to propagate along pathways different from sinus rhythm. Intra-cardiac electrophysiological mapping and catheter ablation are often performed without detailed prior knowledge of the mechanism perpetuating AFlut, likely prolonging the procedure time of these invasive interventions. We sought to discriminate the AFlut location [cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent (CTI), peri-mitral, and other left atrium (LA) AFlut classes] with a machine learning-based algorithm using only the non-invasive signals from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS AND RESULTS: Hybrid 12-lead ECG dataset of 1769 signals was used (1424 in silico ECGs, and 345 clinical ECGs from 115 patients—three different ECG segments over time were extracted from each patient corresponding to single AFlut cycles). Seventy-seven features were extracted. A decision tree classifier with a hold-out classification approach was trained, validated, and tested on the dataset randomly split after selecting the most informative features. The clinical test set comprised 38 patients (114 clinical ECGs). The classifier yielded 76.3% accuracy on the clinical test set with a sensitivity of 89.7%, 75.0%, and 64.1% and a positive predictive value of 71.4%, 75.0%, and 86.2% for CTI, peri-mitral, and other LA class, respectively. Considering majority vote of the three segments taken from each patient, the CTI class was correctly classified at 92%. CONCLUSION: Our results show that a machine learning classifier relying only on non-invasive signals can potentially identify the location of AFlut mechanisms. This method could aid in planning and tailoring patient-specific AFlut treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9301972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93019722022-07-22 Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram Luongo, Giorgio Vacanti, Gaetano Nitzke, Vincent Nairn, Deborah Nagel, Claudia Kabiri, Diba Almeida, Tiago P Soriano, Diogo C Rivolta, Massimo W Ng, Ghulam André Dössel, Olaf Luik, Armin Sassi, Roberto Schmitt, Claus Loewe, Axel Europace Technical Issues AIMS: Atrial flutter (AFlut) is a common re-entrant atrial tachycardia driven by self-sustainable mechanisms that cause excitations to propagate along pathways different from sinus rhythm. Intra-cardiac electrophysiological mapping and catheter ablation are often performed without detailed prior knowledge of the mechanism perpetuating AFlut, likely prolonging the procedure time of these invasive interventions. We sought to discriminate the AFlut location [cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent (CTI), peri-mitral, and other left atrium (LA) AFlut classes] with a machine learning-based algorithm using only the non-invasive signals from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS AND RESULTS: Hybrid 12-lead ECG dataset of 1769 signals was used (1424 in silico ECGs, and 345 clinical ECGs from 115 patients—three different ECG segments over time were extracted from each patient corresponding to single AFlut cycles). Seventy-seven features were extracted. A decision tree classifier with a hold-out classification approach was trained, validated, and tested on the dataset randomly split after selecting the most informative features. The clinical test set comprised 38 patients (114 clinical ECGs). The classifier yielded 76.3% accuracy on the clinical test set with a sensitivity of 89.7%, 75.0%, and 64.1% and a positive predictive value of 71.4%, 75.0%, and 86.2% for CTI, peri-mitral, and other LA class, respectively. Considering majority vote of the three segments taken from each patient, the CTI class was correctly classified at 92%. CONCLUSION: Our results show that a machine learning classifier relying only on non-invasive signals can potentially identify the location of AFlut mechanisms. This method could aid in planning and tailoring patient-specific AFlut treatments. Oxford University Press 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9301972/ /pubmed/35045172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab322 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Technical Issues
Luongo, Giorgio
Vacanti, Gaetano
Nitzke, Vincent
Nairn, Deborah
Nagel, Claudia
Kabiri, Diba
Almeida, Tiago P
Soriano, Diogo C
Rivolta, Massimo W
Ng, Ghulam André
Dössel, Olaf
Luik, Armin
Sassi, Roberto
Schmitt, Claus
Loewe, Axel
Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram
title Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram
title_full Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram
title_fullStr Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram
title_short Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram
title_sort hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram
topic Technical Issues
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab322
work_keys_str_mv AT luongogiorgio hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT vacantigaetano hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT nitzkevincent hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT nairndeborah hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT nagelclaudia hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT kabiridiba hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT almeidatiagop hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT sorianodiogoc hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT rivoltamassimow hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT ngghulamandre hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT dosselolaf hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT luikarmin hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT sassiroberto hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT schmittclaus hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram
AT loeweaxel hybridmachinelearningtolocalizeatrialfluttersubstratesusingthesurface12leadelectrocardiogram