Cargando…

Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature

BACKGROUND. Noninvasive biomarkers distinguishing early immune activation before acute rejection (AR) could more objectively inform immunosuppression management in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). We previously reported a genomic profile distinguishing LTR with AR versus stable graft function. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levitsky, Josh, Kandpal, Manoj, Guo, Kexin, Zhao, Lihui, Kurian, Sunil, Whisenant, Thomas, Abecassis, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003895
_version_ 1784751538770542592
author Levitsky, Josh
Kandpal, Manoj
Guo, Kexin
Zhao, Lihui
Kurian, Sunil
Whisenant, Thomas
Abecassis, Michael
author_facet Levitsky, Josh
Kandpal, Manoj
Guo, Kexin
Zhao, Lihui
Kurian, Sunil
Whisenant, Thomas
Abecassis, Michael
author_sort Levitsky, Josh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Noninvasive biomarkers distinguishing early immune activation before acute rejection (AR) could more objectively inform immunosuppression management in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). We previously reported a genomic profile distinguishing LTR with AR versus stable graft function. This current study includes key phenotypes with other causes of graft dysfunction and uses a novel random forest approach to augment the specificity of predicting and diagnosing AR. METHODS. Gene expression results in LTRs with AR versus non-AR (combination of other causes of graft dysfunction and normal function) were analyzed from single and multicenter cohorts. A 70:30 approach (61 ARs; 162 non-ARs) was used for training and testing sets. Microarray data were normalized using a LT-specific vector. RESULTS. Random forest modeling on the training set generated a 59-probe classifier distinguishing AR versus non-AR (area under the curve 0.83; accuracy 0.78, sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.81, positive predictive value 0.54, negative predictive value [NPV] 0.89; F-score 0.61). Using a locked threshold, the classifier performed well on the testing set (accuracy 0.72, sensitivity 0.67, specificity 0.73, positive predictive value 0.48, NPV 0.86; F-score 0.56). Probability scores increased in samples preceding AR versus non-AR, when liver function tests were normal, and decreased following AR treatment (P < 0.001). Ingenuity pathway analysis of the genes revealed a high percentage related to immune responses and liver injury. CONCLUSIONS. We have developed a blood-based biologically relevant biomarker that can be detected before AR-associated graft injury distinct from LTR never developing AR. Given its high NPV (“rule out AR”), the biomarker has the potential to inform precision-guided immunosuppression minimization in LTRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9301991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93019912022-08-02 Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature Levitsky, Josh Kandpal, Manoj Guo, Kexin Zhao, Lihui Kurian, Sunil Whisenant, Thomas Abecassis, Michael Transplantation Original Clinical Science—Liver BACKGROUND. Noninvasive biomarkers distinguishing early immune activation before acute rejection (AR) could more objectively inform immunosuppression management in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). We previously reported a genomic profile distinguishing LTR with AR versus stable graft function. This current study includes key phenotypes with other causes of graft dysfunction and uses a novel random forest approach to augment the specificity of predicting and diagnosing AR. METHODS. Gene expression results in LTRs with AR versus non-AR (combination of other causes of graft dysfunction and normal function) were analyzed from single and multicenter cohorts. A 70:30 approach (61 ARs; 162 non-ARs) was used for training and testing sets. Microarray data were normalized using a LT-specific vector. RESULTS. Random forest modeling on the training set generated a 59-probe classifier distinguishing AR versus non-AR (area under the curve 0.83; accuracy 0.78, sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.81, positive predictive value 0.54, negative predictive value [NPV] 0.89; F-score 0.61). Using a locked threshold, the classifier performed well on the testing set (accuracy 0.72, sensitivity 0.67, specificity 0.73, positive predictive value 0.48, NPV 0.86; F-score 0.56). Probability scores increased in samples preceding AR versus non-AR, when liver function tests were normal, and decreased following AR treatment (P < 0.001). Ingenuity pathway analysis of the genes revealed a high percentage related to immune responses and liver injury. CONCLUSIONS. We have developed a blood-based biologically relevant biomarker that can be detected before AR-associated graft injury distinct from LTR never developing AR. Given its high NPV (“rule out AR”), the biomarker has the potential to inform precision-guided immunosuppression minimization in LTRs. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-07-22 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9301991/ /pubmed/34342962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003895 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Science—Liver
Levitsky, Josh
Kandpal, Manoj
Guo, Kexin
Zhao, Lihui
Kurian, Sunil
Whisenant, Thomas
Abecassis, Michael
Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature
title Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature
title_full Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature
title_fullStr Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature
title_short Prediction of Liver Transplant Rejection With a Biologically Relevant Gene Expression Signature
title_sort prediction of liver transplant rejection with a biologically relevant gene expression signature
topic Original Clinical Science—Liver
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9301991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003895
work_keys_str_mv AT levitskyjosh predictionoflivertransplantrejectionwithabiologicallyrelevantgeneexpressionsignature
AT kandpalmanoj predictionoflivertransplantrejectionwithabiologicallyrelevantgeneexpressionsignature
AT guokexin predictionoflivertransplantrejectionwithabiologicallyrelevantgeneexpressionsignature
AT zhaolihui predictionoflivertransplantrejectionwithabiologicallyrelevantgeneexpressionsignature
AT kuriansunil predictionoflivertransplantrejectionwithabiologicallyrelevantgeneexpressionsignature
AT whisenantthomas predictionoflivertransplantrejectionwithabiologicallyrelevantgeneexpressionsignature
AT abecassismichael predictionoflivertransplantrejectionwithabiologicallyrelevantgeneexpressionsignature