Cargando…

Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a non‐invasive prenatal screening test (NIPT) for a panel of dominant single‐gene disorders (SGD) with a combined population incidence of 1 in 600. METHODS: Cell‐free fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma samples accessioned from 14 April 2017 to 27 November...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, P., Lemoine, J., Trotter, C., Rakova, I., Billings, P., Peacock, S., Kao, C.‐Y., Wang, Y., Xia, F., Eng, C. M., Benn, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34358384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23756
_version_ 1784751566638546944
author Mohan, P.
Lemoine, J.
Trotter, C.
Rakova, I.
Billings, P.
Peacock, S.
Kao, C.‐Y.
Wang, Y.
Xia, F.
Eng, C. M.
Benn, P.
author_facet Mohan, P.
Lemoine, J.
Trotter, C.
Rakova, I.
Billings, P.
Peacock, S.
Kao, C.‐Y.
Wang, Y.
Xia, F.
Eng, C. M.
Benn, P.
author_sort Mohan, P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a non‐invasive prenatal screening test (NIPT) for a panel of dominant single‐gene disorders (SGD) with a combined population incidence of 1 in 600. METHODS: Cell‐free fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma samples accessioned from 14 April 2017 to 27 November 2019 was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing, targeting 30 genes, to look for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants implicated in 25 dominant conditions. The conditions included Noonan spectrum disorders, skeletal disorders, craniosynostosis syndromes, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Alagille syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, epileptic encephalopathy, SYNGAP1‐related intellectual disability, CHARGE syndrome, Sotos syndrome and Rett syndrome. NIPT‐SGD was made available as a clinical service to women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥ 9 weeks' gestation, with testing on maternal and paternal genomic DNA to assist in interpretation. A minimum of 4.5% fetal fraction was required for test interpretation. Variants identified in the mother were deemed inconclusive with respect to fetal carrier status. Confirmatory prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing was recommended for all screen‐positive patients and follow‐up information was requested. The screen‐positive rates with respect to the clinical indication for testing were evaluated. RESULTS: A NIPT‐SGD result was available for 2208 women, of which 125 (5.7%) were positive. Elevated test‐positive rates were observed for referrals with a family history of a disorder on the panel (20/132 (15.2%)) or a primary indication of fetal long‐bone abnormality (60/178 (33.7%)), fetal craniofacial abnormality (6/21 (28.6%)), fetal lymphatic abnormality (20/150 (13.3%)) or major fetal cardiac defect (4/31 (12.9%)). For paternal age ≥ 40 years as a sole risk factor, the test‐positive rate was 2/912 (0.2%). Of the 125 positive cases, follow‐up information was available for 67 (53.6%), with none classified as false‐positive. No false‐negative cases were identified. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT can assist in the early detection of a set of SGD, particularly when either abnormal ultrasound findings or a family history is present. Additional clinical studies are needed to evaluate the optimal design of the gene panel, define target populations and assess patient acceptability. NIPT‐SGD offers a safe and early prenatal screening option. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93021162022-07-22 Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders Mohan, P. Lemoine, J. Trotter, C. Rakova, I. Billings, P. Peacock, S. Kao, C.‐Y. Wang, Y. Xia, F. Eng, C. M. Benn, P. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a non‐invasive prenatal screening test (NIPT) for a panel of dominant single‐gene disorders (SGD) with a combined population incidence of 1 in 600. METHODS: Cell‐free fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma samples accessioned from 14 April 2017 to 27 November 2019 was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing, targeting 30 genes, to look for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants implicated in 25 dominant conditions. The conditions included Noonan spectrum disorders, skeletal disorders, craniosynostosis syndromes, Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Alagille syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, epileptic encephalopathy, SYNGAP1‐related intellectual disability, CHARGE syndrome, Sotos syndrome and Rett syndrome. NIPT‐SGD was made available as a clinical service to women with a singleton pregnancy at ≥ 9 weeks' gestation, with testing on maternal and paternal genomic DNA to assist in interpretation. A minimum of 4.5% fetal fraction was required for test interpretation. Variants identified in the mother were deemed inconclusive with respect to fetal carrier status. Confirmatory prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing was recommended for all screen‐positive patients and follow‐up information was requested. The screen‐positive rates with respect to the clinical indication for testing were evaluated. RESULTS: A NIPT‐SGD result was available for 2208 women, of which 125 (5.7%) were positive. Elevated test‐positive rates were observed for referrals with a family history of a disorder on the panel (20/132 (15.2%)) or a primary indication of fetal long‐bone abnormality (60/178 (33.7%)), fetal craniofacial abnormality (6/21 (28.6%)), fetal lymphatic abnormality (20/150 (13.3%)) or major fetal cardiac defect (4/31 (12.9%)). For paternal age ≥ 40 years as a sole risk factor, the test‐positive rate was 2/912 (0.2%). Of the 125 positive cases, follow‐up information was available for 67 (53.6%), with none classified as false‐positive. No false‐negative cases were identified. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT can assist in the early detection of a set of SGD, particularly when either abnormal ultrasound findings or a family history is present. Additional clinical studies are needed to evaluate the optimal design of the gene panel, define target populations and assess patient acceptability. NIPT‐SGD offers a safe and early prenatal screening option. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2022-01-05 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9302116/ /pubmed/34358384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23756 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Mohan, P.
Lemoine, J.
Trotter, C.
Rakova, I.
Billings, P.
Peacock, S.
Kao, C.‐Y.
Wang, Y.
Xia, F.
Eng, C. M.
Benn, P.
Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders
title Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders
title_full Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders
title_fullStr Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders
title_full_unstemmed Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders
title_short Clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders
title_sort clinical experience with non‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disorders
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34358384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.23756
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanp clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT lemoinej clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT trotterc clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT rakovai clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT billingsp clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT peacocks clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT kaocy clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT wangy clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT xiaf clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT engcm clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders
AT bennp clinicalexperiencewithnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningforsinglegenedisorders