Cargando…

Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

AIM: In‐hospital blood glucose testing is commonplace, particularly in acute care. In‐hospital screening for hyperglycaemia may present a valuable opportunity for early diabetes diagnosis by identifying at‐risk individuals. This systematic review investigates the extent to which random blood glucose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thornton‐Swan, Tabitha D., Armitage, Laura C., Curtis, Aisling M., Farmer, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14777
_version_ 1784751570363088896
author Thornton‐Swan, Tabitha D.
Armitage, Laura C.
Curtis, Aisling M.
Farmer, Andrew J.
author_facet Thornton‐Swan, Tabitha D.
Armitage, Laura C.
Curtis, Aisling M.
Farmer, Andrew J.
author_sort Thornton‐Swan, Tabitha D.
collection PubMed
description AIM: In‐hospital blood glucose testing is commonplace, particularly in acute care. In‐hospital screening for hyperglycaemia may present a valuable opportunity for early diabetes diagnosis by identifying at‐risk individuals. This systematic review investigates the extent to which random blood glucose testing in acute and inpatient hospital settings predicts undiagnosed diabetes. METHODS: Two databases were systematically searched for studies in which adult patients received an in‐hospital random blood glucose test, followed by a diagnostic HbA1c test. The primary outcome was the proportion of hyperglycaemic individuals diagnosed with diabetes by HbA1c. RESULTS: A total of 3245 unique citations were identified, and 12 were eligible for inclusion. Ten different blood glucose thresholds, ranging from 5.5 to 11.1 mmol/L, were used to detect hyperglycaemia, indicating that there is no consistent clinical definition for hyperglycaemia. The proportion of participants with hyperglycaemia in each study ranged from 3.3% to 62.1%, with a median (Q(1), Q(3)) of 34.5% (5.95%, 61.1%). The proportion of hyperglycaemic participants found to have a diabetes‐range HbA1c varied from 4.1% to 90%, with a median (Q(1), Q(3)) of 18.9% (11.5%, 61.1%). Meta‐analysis was not possible due to substantial heterogeneity between study protocols. CONCLUSIONS: All studies consistently identified a proportion of hyperglycaemic hospital patients as having a diabetes‐range HbA1c, showing that in‐hospital blood glucose screening can facilitate diabetes diagnosis. The proportion of hyperglycaemic participants with undiagnosed diabetes varied substantially, indicating a need for further research and consistency in defining in‐hospital hyperglycaemia. This may aid the development of a standardised screening protocol to identify people with possible undiagnosed diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93021312022-07-22 Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review Thornton‐Swan, Tabitha D. Armitage, Laura C. Curtis, Aisling M. Farmer, Andrew J. Diabet Med Systematic Review or Meta‐analysis AIM: In‐hospital blood glucose testing is commonplace, particularly in acute care. In‐hospital screening for hyperglycaemia may present a valuable opportunity for early diabetes diagnosis by identifying at‐risk individuals. This systematic review investigates the extent to which random blood glucose testing in acute and inpatient hospital settings predicts undiagnosed diabetes. METHODS: Two databases were systematically searched for studies in which adult patients received an in‐hospital random blood glucose test, followed by a diagnostic HbA1c test. The primary outcome was the proportion of hyperglycaemic individuals diagnosed with diabetes by HbA1c. RESULTS: A total of 3245 unique citations were identified, and 12 were eligible for inclusion. Ten different blood glucose thresholds, ranging from 5.5 to 11.1 mmol/L, were used to detect hyperglycaemia, indicating that there is no consistent clinical definition for hyperglycaemia. The proportion of participants with hyperglycaemia in each study ranged from 3.3% to 62.1%, with a median (Q(1), Q(3)) of 34.5% (5.95%, 61.1%). The proportion of hyperglycaemic participants found to have a diabetes‐range HbA1c varied from 4.1% to 90%, with a median (Q(1), Q(3)) of 18.9% (11.5%, 61.1%). Meta‐analysis was not possible due to substantial heterogeneity between study protocols. CONCLUSIONS: All studies consistently identified a proportion of hyperglycaemic hospital patients as having a diabetes‐range HbA1c, showing that in‐hospital blood glucose screening can facilitate diabetes diagnosis. The proportion of hyperglycaemic participants with undiagnosed diabetes varied substantially, indicating a need for further research and consistency in defining in‐hospital hyperglycaemia. This may aid the development of a standardised screening protocol to identify people with possible undiagnosed diabetes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-05 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9302131/ /pubmed/34951710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14777 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review or Meta‐analysis
Thornton‐Swan, Tabitha D.
Armitage, Laura C.
Curtis, Aisling M.
Farmer, Andrew J.
Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
title Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
title_full Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
title_short Assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
title_sort assessment of glycaemic status in adult hospital patients for the detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review or Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.14777
work_keys_str_mv AT thorntonswantabithad assessmentofglycaemicstatusinadulthospitalpatientsforthedetectionofundiagnoseddiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT armitagelaurac assessmentofglycaemicstatusinadulthospitalpatientsforthedetectionofundiagnoseddiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT curtisaislingm assessmentofglycaemicstatusinadulthospitalpatientsforthedetectionofundiagnoseddiabetesmellitusasystematicreview
AT farmerandrewj assessmentofglycaemicstatusinadulthospitalpatientsforthedetectionofundiagnoseddiabetesmellitusasystematicreview