Cargando…

Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials

Safe and effective arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture techniques must be used to reduce harm to hemodialysis patients. The relative benefits of buttonhole (BH) cannulation over those of rope ladder (RL) cannulation for AVF remain unclear and inconsistent. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Li-Ping, Tsai, Li-Hwa, Huang, Hisang-Yun, Okoli, Chizimuzo, Guo, Su-Er
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029597
_version_ 1784751601211146240
author Wang, Li-Ping
Tsai, Li-Hwa
Huang, Hisang-Yun
Okoli, Chizimuzo
Guo, Su-Er
author_facet Wang, Li-Ping
Tsai, Li-Hwa
Huang, Hisang-Yun
Okoli, Chizimuzo
Guo, Su-Er
author_sort Wang, Li-Ping
collection PubMed
description Safe and effective arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture techniques must be used to reduce harm to hemodialysis patients. The relative benefits of buttonhole (BH) cannulation over those of rope ladder (RL) cannulation for AVF remain unclear and inconsistent. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in June 2020 in multiple scientific databases including Cochrane library, CINAHL, PubMed/ Medline, Airiti Library, National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan, Google scholar, Embase, and ProQuest. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) that explored the efficacy of BH cannulation in hemodialysis patients. These included reports published in either English or Chinese that enrolled adults aged 18 years or older who underwent hemodialysis using an autogenous AVF. Studies that showed poor design, such as use of a self-control group or no control group, were excluded from analysis. The critical appraisal skills program checklist for RCTs were used to assess the quality of the evidence and RevMan software were used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (11 RCTs and 4 CCTs) met the inclusion criteria and were used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that BH cannulation significantly reduced aneurysm formation (RR = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.1, 0.32]), stenosis (RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.25, 0.77]), thrombosis formation (RR = 0.4, 95% CI [0.2, 0.8]), and hematoma (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.40, 0.99]) and showed no differences in AVR infection (≦6 months, RR = 2.17, 95% CI [0.76, 6.23]; >6 months, RR = 2.7, 95% CI [0.92, 7.92]) compared to RL cannulation. CONCLUSIONS: Given the benefits of BH, this meta-analysis found that BH cannulation should be recommended as a routine procedure for hemodialysis but that hospitals and hemodialysis clinics should strengthen staff knowledge and skills of BH cannulation to reduce the risk of AVF infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93022782022-08-03 Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials Wang, Li-Ping Tsai, Li-Hwa Huang, Hisang-Yun Okoli, Chizimuzo Guo, Su-Er Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Safe and effective arteriovenous fistula (AVF) puncture techniques must be used to reduce harm to hemodialysis patients. The relative benefits of buttonhole (BH) cannulation over those of rope ladder (RL) cannulation for AVF remain unclear and inconsistent. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were conducted in June 2020 in multiple scientific databases including Cochrane library, CINAHL, PubMed/ Medline, Airiti Library, National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan, Google scholar, Embase, and ProQuest. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) that explored the efficacy of BH cannulation in hemodialysis patients. These included reports published in either English or Chinese that enrolled adults aged 18 years or older who underwent hemodialysis using an autogenous AVF. Studies that showed poor design, such as use of a self-control group or no control group, were excluded from analysis. The critical appraisal skills program checklist for RCTs were used to assess the quality of the evidence and RevMan software were used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (11 RCTs and 4 CCTs) met the inclusion criteria and were used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that BH cannulation significantly reduced aneurysm formation (RR = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.1, 0.32]), stenosis (RR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.25, 0.77]), thrombosis formation (RR = 0.4, 95% CI [0.2, 0.8]), and hematoma (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.40, 0.99]) and showed no differences in AVR infection (≦6 months, RR = 2.17, 95% CI [0.76, 6.23]; >6 months, RR = 2.7, 95% CI [0.92, 7.92]) compared to RL cannulation. CONCLUSIONS: Given the benefits of BH, this meta-analysis found that BH cannulation should be recommended as a routine procedure for hemodialysis but that hospitals and hemodialysis clinics should strengthen staff knowledge and skills of BH cannulation to reduce the risk of AVF infection. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9302278/ /pubmed/35866782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029597 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Li-Ping
Tsai, Li-Hwa
Huang, Hisang-Yun
Okoli, Chizimuzo
Guo, Su-Er
Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials
title Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials
title_full Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials
title_fullStr Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials
title_short Effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials
title_sort effect of buttonhole cannulation versus rope-ladder cannulation in hemodialysis patients with vascular access: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized/clinical controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029597
work_keys_str_mv AT wangliping effectofbuttonholecannulationversusropeladdercannulationinhemodialysispatientswithvascularaccessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicalcontrolledtrials
AT tsailihwa effectofbuttonholecannulationversusropeladdercannulationinhemodialysispatientswithvascularaccessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicalcontrolledtrials
AT huanghisangyun effectofbuttonholecannulationversusropeladdercannulationinhemodialysispatientswithvascularaccessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicalcontrolledtrials
AT okolichizimuzo effectofbuttonholecannulationversusropeladdercannulationinhemodialysispatientswithvascularaccessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicalcontrolledtrials
AT guosuer effectofbuttonholecannulationversusropeladdercannulationinhemodialysispatientswithvascularaccessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicalcontrolledtrials