Cargando…

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodine 125 ((125)I) radioactive seed implantation for small cell lung cancer at the limited stage of relapse as second line therapy. We collected 6 patients with recurred limited stage small cell lung cancer, who got pathological diagnosis afte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Guoli, Wang, Yizong, Dong, Dianguo, Zhang, Wenjie, Wang, Lei, Wan, Zhaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029251
_version_ 1784751603673202688
author Cheng, Guoli
Wang, Yizong
Dong, Dianguo
Zhang, Wenjie
Wang, Lei
Wan, Zhaojun
author_facet Cheng, Guoli
Wang, Yizong
Dong, Dianguo
Zhang, Wenjie
Wang, Lei
Wan, Zhaojun
author_sort Cheng, Guoli
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodine 125 ((125)I) radioactive seed implantation for small cell lung cancer at the limited stage of relapse as second line therapy. We collected 6 patients with recurred limited stage small cell lung cancer, who got pathological diagnosis after a bronchoscopic biopsy and then received standard first line treatment, combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including prophylactic cranial irradiation. These recurred small cell lung cancer patients got (125)I seed implantation treatment as second line therapy, if the treatment not good responsive or the disease got rapid progress, we used the second line chemotherapy as salvage treatment. Clinical data of these patients were collected and short-term effects were observed. The follow-up period lasted for 42 months. All the patients tolerated the procedure of (125)I radioactive seed implantation very well. We followed up the patients to 42 months. Five patients got complete remission and 1 patient got partial remission at 1 month after implantation. The objective response rate was 100%. The median survival time was 26 months. And median progression-free survival was 12 months after (125)I treatment. And about the complications, 1 patient suffered from the light aerothorax, 1 patient had a little hemoptysis. Our study showed that (125)I seed implantation as second line regimen in small cell lung cancer that recurred locally after first line treatment was effective and safe. That could improve the overall survival and progression-free survival only comparing to the second line chemotherapy. Therefore (125)I seed implantation as brachytherapy protocol is a promising method and can be applied as second line treatment to control the locally recurred small cell lung cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93022882022-08-03 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy Cheng, Guoli Wang, Yizong Dong, Dianguo Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Lei Wan, Zhaojun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodine 125 ((125)I) radioactive seed implantation for small cell lung cancer at the limited stage of relapse as second line therapy. We collected 6 patients with recurred limited stage small cell lung cancer, who got pathological diagnosis after a bronchoscopic biopsy and then received standard first line treatment, combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including prophylactic cranial irradiation. These recurred small cell lung cancer patients got (125)I seed implantation treatment as second line therapy, if the treatment not good responsive or the disease got rapid progress, we used the second line chemotherapy as salvage treatment. Clinical data of these patients were collected and short-term effects were observed. The follow-up period lasted for 42 months. All the patients tolerated the procedure of (125)I radioactive seed implantation very well. We followed up the patients to 42 months. Five patients got complete remission and 1 patient got partial remission at 1 month after implantation. The objective response rate was 100%. The median survival time was 26 months. And median progression-free survival was 12 months after (125)I treatment. And about the complications, 1 patient suffered from the light aerothorax, 1 patient had a little hemoptysis. Our study showed that (125)I seed implantation as second line regimen in small cell lung cancer that recurred locally after first line treatment was effective and safe. That could improve the overall survival and progression-free survival only comparing to the second line chemotherapy. Therefore (125)I seed implantation as brachytherapy protocol is a promising method and can be applied as second line treatment to control the locally recurred small cell lung cancer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9302288/ /pubmed/35866803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029251 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheng, Guoli
Wang, Yizong
Dong, Dianguo
Zhang, Wenjie
Wang, Lei
Wan, Zhaojun
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy
title To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy
title_full To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy
title_fullStr To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy
title_full_unstemmed To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy
title_short To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy
title_sort to evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)i seed implantation in sclc as second line therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029251
work_keys_str_mv AT chengguoli toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy
AT wangyizong toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy
AT dongdianguo toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy
AT zhangwenjie toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy
AT wanglei toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy
AT wanzhaojun toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy