Cargando…
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodine 125 ((125)I) radioactive seed implantation for small cell lung cancer at the limited stage of relapse as second line therapy. We collected 6 patients with recurred limited stage small cell lung cancer, who got pathological diagnosis afte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029251 |
_version_ | 1784751603673202688 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Guoli Wang, Yizong Dong, Dianguo Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Lei Wan, Zhaojun |
author_facet | Cheng, Guoli Wang, Yizong Dong, Dianguo Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Lei Wan, Zhaojun |
author_sort | Cheng, Guoli |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodine 125 ((125)I) radioactive seed implantation for small cell lung cancer at the limited stage of relapse as second line therapy. We collected 6 patients with recurred limited stage small cell lung cancer, who got pathological diagnosis after a bronchoscopic biopsy and then received standard first line treatment, combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including prophylactic cranial irradiation. These recurred small cell lung cancer patients got (125)I seed implantation treatment as second line therapy, if the treatment not good responsive or the disease got rapid progress, we used the second line chemotherapy as salvage treatment. Clinical data of these patients were collected and short-term effects were observed. The follow-up period lasted for 42 months. All the patients tolerated the procedure of (125)I radioactive seed implantation very well. We followed up the patients to 42 months. Five patients got complete remission and 1 patient got partial remission at 1 month after implantation. The objective response rate was 100%. The median survival time was 26 months. And median progression-free survival was 12 months after (125)I treatment. And about the complications, 1 patient suffered from the light aerothorax, 1 patient had a little hemoptysis. Our study showed that (125)I seed implantation as second line regimen in small cell lung cancer that recurred locally after first line treatment was effective and safe. That could improve the overall survival and progression-free survival only comparing to the second line chemotherapy. Therefore (125)I seed implantation as brachytherapy protocol is a promising method and can be applied as second line treatment to control the locally recurred small cell lung cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9302288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93022882022-08-03 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy Cheng, Guoli Wang, Yizong Dong, Dianguo Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Lei Wan, Zhaojun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodine 125 ((125)I) radioactive seed implantation for small cell lung cancer at the limited stage of relapse as second line therapy. We collected 6 patients with recurred limited stage small cell lung cancer, who got pathological diagnosis after a bronchoscopic biopsy and then received standard first line treatment, combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including prophylactic cranial irradiation. These recurred small cell lung cancer patients got (125)I seed implantation treatment as second line therapy, if the treatment not good responsive or the disease got rapid progress, we used the second line chemotherapy as salvage treatment. Clinical data of these patients were collected and short-term effects were observed. The follow-up period lasted for 42 months. All the patients tolerated the procedure of (125)I radioactive seed implantation very well. We followed up the patients to 42 months. Five patients got complete remission and 1 patient got partial remission at 1 month after implantation. The objective response rate was 100%. The median survival time was 26 months. And median progression-free survival was 12 months after (125)I treatment. And about the complications, 1 patient suffered from the light aerothorax, 1 patient had a little hemoptysis. Our study showed that (125)I seed implantation as second line regimen in small cell lung cancer that recurred locally after first line treatment was effective and safe. That could improve the overall survival and progression-free survival only comparing to the second line chemotherapy. Therefore (125)I seed implantation as brachytherapy protocol is a promising method and can be applied as second line treatment to control the locally recurred small cell lung cancer. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9302288/ /pubmed/35866803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029251 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cheng, Guoli Wang, Yizong Dong, Dianguo Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Lei Wan, Zhaojun To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy |
title | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy |
title_full | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy |
title_fullStr | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy |
title_short | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)I seed implantation in SCLC as second line therapy |
title_sort | to evaluate the efficacy and safety of (125)i seed implantation in sclc as second line therapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengguoli toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy AT wangyizong toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy AT dongdianguo toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy AT zhangwenjie toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy AT wanglei toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy AT wanzhaojun toevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyof125iseedimplantationinsclcassecondlinetherapy |