Cargando…

Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries

The surgical stress responses, surgeries, and anesthetics used during surgeries have effects on post-surgery complications and metastasis. Volatile and/or intravenous anesthetics are generally used for cancer curative surgeries. Therefore, appropriate selection of anesthetics should be considered fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ying, Wang, Fang, Zhang, Hui, Wei, Yulong, Deng, Yanan, Wang, Dezhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029169
_version_ 1784751613236215808
author Zhang, Ying
Wang, Fang
Zhang, Hui
Wei, Yulong
Deng, Yanan
Wang, Dezhi
author_facet Zhang, Ying
Wang, Fang
Zhang, Hui
Wei, Yulong
Deng, Yanan
Wang, Dezhi
author_sort Zhang, Ying
collection PubMed
description The surgical stress responses, surgeries, and anesthetics used during surgeries have effects on post-surgery complications and metastasis. Volatile and/or intravenous anesthetics are generally used for cancer curative surgeries. Therefore, appropriate selection of anesthetics should be considered for better clinical outcomes. The objectives of the study were to compare postoperative complications, the overall survival, and recurrence-free survival of patients who had received volatile anesthesia against those of patients who had received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for digestive tract cancer curative surgeries. Patients had received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (PA cohort, n = 120) or volatile anesthesia (VA cohort, n = 185) for elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries. Patients with age > 50 years (P = .0399), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (P = .0423), cancer stage III (P = .0041), and cancer stage IV (P = .0189) were operated through volatile anesthesia. Females (P = .0346), disable patients (P = .0479), patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 (P = .0449), patients with cancer stage 0 or I (P = .0141), and patients with cancer stage II (P = .0289) were operated through propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. Postoperative complication(s) between patients of both cohorts were statistically same (P = .9217). After 3-years of the follow-up period, a total of 81 (44%) patients from the VA cohort and 63 (52%) patients from the PA cohort survived irrespective of any kind of disease(s) (P = .9918). Also, a total of 53 (29%) patients from the VA cohort and 42 (35%) patients from the PA cohort survived without progression of cancer (P = .9981) after 3-years. Age > 50 years (P = 0.0491), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 (P = 0.0481), and cancer stage > II (P = .0412) were independent parameters for death of patients suffering from digestive tract cancer due to any reason(s) during 3-years of the follow-up period after surgeries. The selection of anesthetic agents for cancer curative surgeries does not affect survival during 3-years of follow-up and postoperative complication(s) of patients suffering from digestive tract cancer (Level of Evidence: III; Technical Efficacy Stage: 4).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93023292022-08-03 Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries Zhang, Ying Wang, Fang Zhang, Hui Wei, Yulong Deng, Yanan Wang, Dezhi Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The surgical stress responses, surgeries, and anesthetics used during surgeries have effects on post-surgery complications and metastasis. Volatile and/or intravenous anesthetics are generally used for cancer curative surgeries. Therefore, appropriate selection of anesthetics should be considered for better clinical outcomes. The objectives of the study were to compare postoperative complications, the overall survival, and recurrence-free survival of patients who had received volatile anesthesia against those of patients who had received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for digestive tract cancer curative surgeries. Patients had received propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (PA cohort, n = 120) or volatile anesthesia (VA cohort, n = 185) for elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries. Patients with age > 50 years (P = .0399), body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (P = .0423), cancer stage III (P = .0041), and cancer stage IV (P = .0189) were operated through volatile anesthesia. Females (P = .0346), disable patients (P = .0479), patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index 2 (P = .0449), patients with cancer stage 0 or I (P = .0141), and patients with cancer stage II (P = .0289) were operated through propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. Postoperative complication(s) between patients of both cohorts were statistically same (P = .9217). After 3-years of the follow-up period, a total of 81 (44%) patients from the VA cohort and 63 (52%) patients from the PA cohort survived irrespective of any kind of disease(s) (P = .9918). Also, a total of 53 (29%) patients from the VA cohort and 42 (35%) patients from the PA cohort survived without progression of cancer (P = .9981) after 3-years. Age > 50 years (P = 0.0491), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 3 (P = 0.0481), and cancer stage > II (P = .0412) were independent parameters for death of patients suffering from digestive tract cancer due to any reason(s) during 3-years of the follow-up period after surgeries. The selection of anesthetic agents for cancer curative surgeries does not affect survival during 3-years of follow-up and postoperative complication(s) of patients suffering from digestive tract cancer (Level of Evidence: III; Technical Efficacy Stage: 4). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9302329/ /pubmed/35866788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029169 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Ying
Wang, Fang
Zhang, Hui
Wei, Yulong
Deng, Yanan
Wang, Dezhi
Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
title Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
title_full Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
title_fullStr Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
title_short Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
title_sort volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029169
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangying volatileanesthesiaversuspropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaaretrospectiveanalysisofchartsofpatientswhounderwentelectivedigestivetractcancercurativesurgeries
AT wangfang volatileanesthesiaversuspropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaaretrospectiveanalysisofchartsofpatientswhounderwentelectivedigestivetractcancercurativesurgeries
AT zhanghui volatileanesthesiaversuspropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaaretrospectiveanalysisofchartsofpatientswhounderwentelectivedigestivetractcancercurativesurgeries
AT weiyulong volatileanesthesiaversuspropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaaretrospectiveanalysisofchartsofpatientswhounderwentelectivedigestivetractcancercurativesurgeries
AT dengyanan volatileanesthesiaversuspropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaaretrospectiveanalysisofchartsofpatientswhounderwentelectivedigestivetractcancercurativesurgeries
AT wangdezhi volatileanesthesiaversuspropofolbasedtotalintravenousanesthesiaaretrospectiveanalysisofchartsofpatientswhounderwentelectivedigestivetractcancercurativesurgeries