Cargando…

Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of papillary muscle ventricular arrhythmias (PM‐VAs) has been associated with unsatisfactory results. Features that may affect acute and long‐term procedural outcomes are not well established. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the available data in the literature asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariani, Marco Valerio, Piro, Agostino, Magnocavallo, Michele, Chimenti, Cristina, Della Rocca, Domenico, Santangeli, Pasquale, Natale, Andrea, Fedele, Francesco, Lavalle, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35147225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14462
_version_ 1784751676471640064
author Mariani, Marco Valerio
Piro, Agostino
Magnocavallo, Michele
Chimenti, Cristina
Della Rocca, Domenico
Santangeli, Pasquale
Natale, Andrea
Fedele, Francesco
Lavalle, Carlo
author_facet Mariani, Marco Valerio
Piro, Agostino
Magnocavallo, Michele
Chimenti, Cristina
Della Rocca, Domenico
Santangeli, Pasquale
Natale, Andrea
Fedele, Francesco
Lavalle, Carlo
author_sort Mariani, Marco Valerio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of papillary muscle ventricular arrhythmias (PM‐VAs) has been associated with unsatisfactory results. Features that may affect acute and long‐term procedural outcomes are not well established. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the available data in the literature assessing efficacy and safety of PM‐VAs catheter ablation. METHODS: An online search of PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE libraries (from inception to March 1, 2021) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Twenty‐one observational noncontrolled case‐series were considered eligible for the systematic review, including 536 patients. RESULTS: Postero‐medial PM harbored 60.8% of PM‐VAs, while antero‐lateral PM and right ventricular PMs 34.9% and 4.3% of cases, respectively. The mean acute success rate of the index ablation procedure was 88.1% (95% CI 82.8% to 91.9%, p < .001, I(2) 0%). After a mean follow‐up period of 15.5 ± 17.4 months, pooled long‐term arrhythmia‐free rate was 69.2%, while the pooled long‐term success rate after multiple ablation procedure was 84.9%. Overall, procedure complications occurred in nine patients (1.7%) and no procedure‐related deaths were reported. The use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) as well as contact force sensing (CFS) and irrigated catheters during ablation was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia‐freedom at long‐term follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation is an effective and safe strategy for PM‐VAs, with an acute success rate of 88.1%, a long‐term success rate of 69.2%, with a relatively low procedural complication rate. The use of ICE, irrigated catheters and catheters with CFS capability was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia‐freedom at long‐term follow‐up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93026472022-07-22 Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review Mariani, Marco Valerio Piro, Agostino Magnocavallo, Michele Chimenti, Cristina Della Rocca, Domenico Santangeli, Pasquale Natale, Andrea Fedele, Francesco Lavalle, Carlo Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Electrophysiology BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of papillary muscle ventricular arrhythmias (PM‐VAs) has been associated with unsatisfactory results. Features that may affect acute and long‐term procedural outcomes are not well established. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the available data in the literature assessing efficacy and safety of PM‐VAs catheter ablation. METHODS: An online search of PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE libraries (from inception to March 1, 2021) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Twenty‐one observational noncontrolled case‐series were considered eligible for the systematic review, including 536 patients. RESULTS: Postero‐medial PM harbored 60.8% of PM‐VAs, while antero‐lateral PM and right ventricular PMs 34.9% and 4.3% of cases, respectively. The mean acute success rate of the index ablation procedure was 88.1% (95% CI 82.8% to 91.9%, p < .001, I(2) 0%). After a mean follow‐up period of 15.5 ± 17.4 months, pooled long‐term arrhythmia‐free rate was 69.2%, while the pooled long‐term success rate after multiple ablation procedure was 84.9%. Overall, procedure complications occurred in nine patients (1.7%) and no procedure‐related deaths were reported. The use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) as well as contact force sensing (CFS) and irrigated catheters during ablation was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia‐freedom at long‐term follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation is an effective and safe strategy for PM‐VAs, with an acute success rate of 88.1%, a long‐term success rate of 69.2%, with a relatively low procedural complication rate. The use of ICE, irrigated catheters and catheters with CFS capability was associated with higher rates of arrhythmia‐freedom at long‐term follow‐up. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-21 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9302647/ /pubmed/35147225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14462 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Electrophysiology
Mariani, Marco Valerio
Piro, Agostino
Magnocavallo, Michele
Chimenti, Cristina
Della Rocca, Domenico
Santangeli, Pasquale
Natale, Andrea
Fedele, Francesco
Lavalle, Carlo
Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review
title Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review
title_full Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review
title_fullStr Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review
title_short Catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: A systematic review
title_sort catheter ablation for papillary muscle arrhythmias: a systematic review
topic Electrophysiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35147225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14462
work_keys_str_mv AT marianimarcovalerio catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT piroagostino catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT magnocavallomichele catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT chimenticristina catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT dellaroccadomenico catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT santangelipasquale catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT nataleandrea catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT fedelefrancesco catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview
AT lavallecarlo catheterablationforpapillarymusclearrhythmiasasystematicreview