Cargando…
An introduction to decision science for conservation
Biodiversity conservation decisions are difficult, especially when they involve differing values, complex multidimensional objectives, scarce resources, urgency, and considerable uncertainty. Decision science embodies a theory about how to make difficult decisions and an extensive array of framework...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34856010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13868 |
_version_ | 1784751682103541760 |
---|---|
author | Hemming, Victoria Camaclang, Abbey E. Adams, Megan S. Burgman, Mark Carbeck, Katherine Carwardine, Josie Chadès, Iadine Chalifour, Lia Converse, Sarah J. Davidson, Lindsay N. K. Garrard, Georgia E. Finn, Riley Fleri, Jesse R. Huard, Jacqueline Mayfield, Helen J. Madden, Eve McDonald Naujokaitis‐Lewis, Ilona Possingham, Hugh P. Rumpff, Libby Runge, Michael C. Stewart, Daniel Tulloch, Vivitskaia J. D. Walshe, Terry Martin, Tara G. |
author_facet | Hemming, Victoria Camaclang, Abbey E. Adams, Megan S. Burgman, Mark Carbeck, Katherine Carwardine, Josie Chadès, Iadine Chalifour, Lia Converse, Sarah J. Davidson, Lindsay N. K. Garrard, Georgia E. Finn, Riley Fleri, Jesse R. Huard, Jacqueline Mayfield, Helen J. Madden, Eve McDonald Naujokaitis‐Lewis, Ilona Possingham, Hugh P. Rumpff, Libby Runge, Michael C. Stewart, Daniel Tulloch, Vivitskaia J. D. Walshe, Terry Martin, Tara G. |
author_sort | Hemming, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biodiversity conservation decisions are difficult, especially when they involve differing values, complex multidimensional objectives, scarce resources, urgency, and considerable uncertainty. Decision science embodies a theory about how to make difficult decisions and an extensive array of frameworks and tools that make that theory practical. We sought to improve conceptual clarity and practical application of decision science to help decision makers apply decision science to conservation problems. We addressed barriers to the uptake of decision science, including a lack of training and awareness of decision science; confusion over common terminology and which tools and frameworks to apply; and the mistaken impression that applying decision science must be time consuming, expensive, and complex. To aid in navigating the extensive and disparate decision science literature, we clarify meaning of common terms: decision science, decision theory, decision analysis, structured decision‐making, and decision‐support tools. Applying decision science does not have to be complex or time consuming; rather, it begins with knowing how to think through the components of a decision utilizing decision analysis (i.e., define the problem, elicit objectives, develop alternatives, estimate consequences, and perform trade‐offs). This is best achieved by applying a rapid‐prototyping approach. At each step, decision‐support tools can provide additional insight and clarity, whereas decision‐support frameworks (e.g., priority threat management and systematic conservation planning) can aid navigation of multiple steps of a decision analysis for particular contexts. We summarize key decision‐support frameworks and tools and describe to which step of a decision analysis, and to which contexts, each is most useful to apply. Our introduction to decision science will aid in contextualizing current approaches and new developments, and help decision makers begin to apply decision science to conservation problems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9302662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93026622022-07-22 An introduction to decision science for conservation Hemming, Victoria Camaclang, Abbey E. Adams, Megan S. Burgman, Mark Carbeck, Katherine Carwardine, Josie Chadès, Iadine Chalifour, Lia Converse, Sarah J. Davidson, Lindsay N. K. Garrard, Georgia E. Finn, Riley Fleri, Jesse R. Huard, Jacqueline Mayfield, Helen J. Madden, Eve McDonald Naujokaitis‐Lewis, Ilona Possingham, Hugh P. Rumpff, Libby Runge, Michael C. Stewart, Daniel Tulloch, Vivitskaia J. D. Walshe, Terry Martin, Tara G. Conserv Biol Reviews Biodiversity conservation decisions are difficult, especially when they involve differing values, complex multidimensional objectives, scarce resources, urgency, and considerable uncertainty. Decision science embodies a theory about how to make difficult decisions and an extensive array of frameworks and tools that make that theory practical. We sought to improve conceptual clarity and practical application of decision science to help decision makers apply decision science to conservation problems. We addressed barriers to the uptake of decision science, including a lack of training and awareness of decision science; confusion over common terminology and which tools and frameworks to apply; and the mistaken impression that applying decision science must be time consuming, expensive, and complex. To aid in navigating the extensive and disparate decision science literature, we clarify meaning of common terms: decision science, decision theory, decision analysis, structured decision‐making, and decision‐support tools. Applying decision science does not have to be complex or time consuming; rather, it begins with knowing how to think through the components of a decision utilizing decision analysis (i.e., define the problem, elicit objectives, develop alternatives, estimate consequences, and perform trade‐offs). This is best achieved by applying a rapid‐prototyping approach. At each step, decision‐support tools can provide additional insight and clarity, whereas decision‐support frameworks (e.g., priority threat management and systematic conservation planning) can aid navigation of multiple steps of a decision analysis for particular contexts. We summarize key decision‐support frameworks and tools and describe to which step of a decision analysis, and to which contexts, each is most useful to apply. Our introduction to decision science will aid in contextualizing current approaches and new developments, and help decision makers begin to apply decision science to conservation problems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-28 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9302662/ /pubmed/34856010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13868 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Hemming, Victoria Camaclang, Abbey E. Adams, Megan S. Burgman, Mark Carbeck, Katherine Carwardine, Josie Chadès, Iadine Chalifour, Lia Converse, Sarah J. Davidson, Lindsay N. K. Garrard, Georgia E. Finn, Riley Fleri, Jesse R. Huard, Jacqueline Mayfield, Helen J. Madden, Eve McDonald Naujokaitis‐Lewis, Ilona Possingham, Hugh P. Rumpff, Libby Runge, Michael C. Stewart, Daniel Tulloch, Vivitskaia J. D. Walshe, Terry Martin, Tara G. An introduction to decision science for conservation |
title | An introduction to decision science for conservation |
title_full | An introduction to decision science for conservation |
title_fullStr | An introduction to decision science for conservation |
title_full_unstemmed | An introduction to decision science for conservation |
title_short | An introduction to decision science for conservation |
title_sort | introduction to decision science for conservation |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34856010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13868 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hemmingvictoria anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT camaclangabbeye anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT adamsmegans anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT burgmanmark anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT carbeckkatherine anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT carwardinejosie anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT chadesiadine anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT chalifourlia anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT conversesarahj anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT davidsonlindsaynk anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT garrardgeorgiae anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT finnriley anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT flerijesser anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT huardjacqueline anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT mayfieldhelenj anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT maddenevemcdonald anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT naujokaitislewisilona anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT possinghamhughp anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT rumpfflibby anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT rungemichaelc anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT stewartdaniel anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT tullochvivitskaiajd anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT walsheterry anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT martintarag anintroductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT hemmingvictoria introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT camaclangabbeye introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT adamsmegans introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT burgmanmark introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT carbeckkatherine introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT carwardinejosie introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT chadesiadine introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT chalifourlia introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT conversesarahj introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT davidsonlindsaynk introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT garrardgeorgiae introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT finnriley introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT flerijesser introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT huardjacqueline introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT mayfieldhelenj introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT maddenevemcdonald introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT naujokaitislewisilona introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT possinghamhughp introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT rumpfflibby introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT rungemichaelc introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT stewartdaniel introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT tullochvivitskaiajd introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT walsheterry introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation AT martintarag introductiontodecisionscienceforconservation |