Cargando…

Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a common condition present in older Emergency Department (ED) patients that is associated with poor health outcomes. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a tool that measures frailty on a scale from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). The goal of this scoping review was to desc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fehlmann, Christophe Alain, Nickel, Christian Hans, Cino, Emily, Al-Najjar, Zinnia, Langlois, Nigèle, Eagles, Debra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-03042-5
_version_ 1784751731963330560
author Fehlmann, Christophe Alain
Nickel, Christian Hans
Cino, Emily
Al-Najjar, Zinnia
Langlois, Nigèle
Eagles, Debra
author_facet Fehlmann, Christophe Alain
Nickel, Christian Hans
Cino, Emily
Al-Najjar, Zinnia
Langlois, Nigèle
Eagles, Debra
author_sort Fehlmann, Christophe Alain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frailty is a common condition present in older Emergency Department (ED) patients that is associated with poor health outcomes. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a tool that measures frailty on a scale from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). The goal of this scoping review was to describe current use of the CFS in emergency medicine and to identify gaps in research. METHODS: We performed a systemic literature search to identify original research that used the CFS in emergency medicine. Several databases were searched from January 2005 to July 2021. Two independent reviewers completed screening, full text review and data abstraction, with a focus on study characteristics, CFS assessment (evaluators, timing and purpose), study outcomes and statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 4818 unique citations were identified; 34 studies were included in the final analysis. Among them, 76% were published after 2018, mainly in Europe or North America (79%). Only two assessed CFS in the pre-hospital setting. The nine-point scale was used in 74% of the studies, and patient consent was required in 69% of them. The main reason to use CFS was as a main exposure (44%), a potential predictor (15%) or an outcome (15%). The most frequently studied outcomes were mortality and hospital admission. CONCLUSION: The use of CFS in emergency medicine research is drastically increasing. However, the reporting is not optimal and should be more standardized. Studies evaluating the impact of frailty assessment in the ED are needed. REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W2F8N
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93028742022-07-22 Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review Fehlmann, Christophe Alain Nickel, Christian Hans Cino, Emily Al-Najjar, Zinnia Langlois, Nigèle Eagles, Debra Intern Emerg Med CE-Systematic reviews and meta-analysis BACKGROUND: Frailty is a common condition present in older Emergency Department (ED) patients that is associated with poor health outcomes. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a tool that measures frailty on a scale from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). The goal of this scoping review was to describe current use of the CFS in emergency medicine and to identify gaps in research. METHODS: We performed a systemic literature search to identify original research that used the CFS in emergency medicine. Several databases were searched from January 2005 to July 2021. Two independent reviewers completed screening, full text review and data abstraction, with a focus on study characteristics, CFS assessment (evaluators, timing and purpose), study outcomes and statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 4818 unique citations were identified; 34 studies were included in the final analysis. Among them, 76% were published after 2018, mainly in Europe or North America (79%). Only two assessed CFS in the pre-hospital setting. The nine-point scale was used in 74% of the studies, and patient consent was required in 69% of them. The main reason to use CFS was as a main exposure (44%), a potential predictor (15%) or an outcome (15%). The most frequently studied outcomes were mortality and hospital admission. CONCLUSION: The use of CFS in emergency medicine research is drastically increasing. However, the reporting is not optimal and should be more standardized. Studies evaluating the impact of frailty assessment in the ED are needed. REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W2F8N Springer International Publishing 2022-07-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9302874/ /pubmed/35864373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-03042-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle CE-Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Fehlmann, Christophe Alain
Nickel, Christian Hans
Cino, Emily
Al-Najjar, Zinnia
Langlois, Nigèle
Eagles, Debra
Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review
title Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review
title_full Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review
title_fullStr Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review
title_short Frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the Clinical Frailty Scale: a scoping review
title_sort frailty assessment in emergency medicine using the clinical frailty scale: a scoping review
topic CE-Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-03042-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fehlmannchristophealain frailtyassessmentinemergencymedicineusingtheclinicalfrailtyscaleascopingreview
AT nickelchristianhans frailtyassessmentinemergencymedicineusingtheclinicalfrailtyscaleascopingreview
AT cinoemily frailtyassessmentinemergencymedicineusingtheclinicalfrailtyscaleascopingreview
AT alnajjarzinnia frailtyassessmentinemergencymedicineusingtheclinicalfrailtyscaleascopingreview
AT langloisnigele frailtyassessmentinemergencymedicineusingtheclinicalfrailtyscaleascopingreview
AT eaglesdebra frailtyassessmentinemergencymedicineusingtheclinicalfrailtyscaleascopingreview