Cargando…

Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes

The global distribution of vegetation is largely determined by climatic conditions and feeds back into the climate system. To predict future vegetation changes in response to climate change, it is crucial to identify and understand key patterns and processes that couple vegetation and climate. Dynam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beigaitė, Rita, Tang, Hui, Bryn, Anders, Skarpaas, Olav, Stordal, Frode, Bjerke, Jarle W., Žliobaitė, Indrė
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16110
_version_ 1784751753003008000
author Beigaitė, Rita
Tang, Hui
Bryn, Anders
Skarpaas, Olav
Stordal, Frode
Bjerke, Jarle W.
Žliobaitė, Indrė
author_facet Beigaitė, Rita
Tang, Hui
Bryn, Anders
Skarpaas, Olav
Stordal, Frode
Bjerke, Jarle W.
Žliobaitė, Indrė
author_sort Beigaitė, Rita
collection PubMed
description The global distribution of vegetation is largely determined by climatic conditions and feeds back into the climate system. To predict future vegetation changes in response to climate change, it is crucial to identify and understand key patterns and processes that couple vegetation and climate. Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) have been widely applied to describe the distribution of vegetation types and their future dynamics in response to climate change. As a process‐based approach, it partly relies on hard‐coded climate thresholds to constrain the distribution of vegetation. What thresholds to implement in DGVMs and how to replace them with more process‐based descriptions remain among the major challenges. In this study, we employ machine learning using decision trees to extract large‐scale relationships between the global distribution of vegetation and climatic characteristics from remotely sensed vegetation and climate data. We analyse how the dominant vegetation types are linked to climate extremes as compared to seasonally or annually averaged climatic conditions. The results show that climate extremes allow us to describe the distribution and eco‐climatological space of the vegetation types more accurately than the averaged climate variables, especially those types which occupy small territories in a relatively homogeneous ecological space. Future predicted vegetation changes using both climate extremes and averaged climate variables are less prominent than that predicted by averaged climate variables and are in better agreement with those of DGVMs, further indicating the importance of climate extremes in determining geographic distributions of different vegetation types. We found that the temperature thresholds for vegetation types (e.g. grass and open shrubland) in cold environments vary with moisture conditions. The coldest daily maximum temperature (extreme cold day) is particularly important for separating many different vegetation types. These findings highlight the need for a more explicit representation of the impacts of climate extremes on vegetation in DGVMs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93029872022-07-22 Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes Beigaitė, Rita Tang, Hui Bryn, Anders Skarpaas, Olav Stordal, Frode Bjerke, Jarle W. Žliobaitė, Indrė Glob Chang Biol Invited Research Article The global distribution of vegetation is largely determined by climatic conditions and feeds back into the climate system. To predict future vegetation changes in response to climate change, it is crucial to identify and understand key patterns and processes that couple vegetation and climate. Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) have been widely applied to describe the distribution of vegetation types and their future dynamics in response to climate change. As a process‐based approach, it partly relies on hard‐coded climate thresholds to constrain the distribution of vegetation. What thresholds to implement in DGVMs and how to replace them with more process‐based descriptions remain among the major challenges. In this study, we employ machine learning using decision trees to extract large‐scale relationships between the global distribution of vegetation and climatic characteristics from remotely sensed vegetation and climate data. We analyse how the dominant vegetation types are linked to climate extremes as compared to seasonally or annually averaged climatic conditions. The results show that climate extremes allow us to describe the distribution and eco‐climatological space of the vegetation types more accurately than the averaged climate variables, especially those types which occupy small territories in a relatively homogeneous ecological space. Future predicted vegetation changes using both climate extremes and averaged climate variables are less prominent than that predicted by averaged climate variables and are in better agreement with those of DGVMs, further indicating the importance of climate extremes in determining geographic distributions of different vegetation types. We found that the temperature thresholds for vegetation types (e.g. grass and open shrubland) in cold environments vary with moisture conditions. The coldest daily maximum temperature (extreme cold day) is particularly important for separating many different vegetation types. These findings highlight the need for a more explicit representation of the impacts of climate extremes on vegetation in DGVMs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-24 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9302987/ /pubmed/35212092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16110 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Invited Research Article
Beigaitė, Rita
Tang, Hui
Bryn, Anders
Skarpaas, Olav
Stordal, Frode
Bjerke, Jarle W.
Žliobaitė, Indrė
Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes
title Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes
title_full Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes
title_fullStr Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes
title_full_unstemmed Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes
title_short Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes
title_sort identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: average climate versus extremes
topic Invited Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35212092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16110
work_keys_str_mv AT beigaiterita identifyingclimatethresholdsfordominantnaturalvegetationtypesattheglobalscaleusingmachinelearningaverageclimateversusextremes
AT tanghui identifyingclimatethresholdsfordominantnaturalvegetationtypesattheglobalscaleusingmachinelearningaverageclimateversusextremes
AT brynanders identifyingclimatethresholdsfordominantnaturalvegetationtypesattheglobalscaleusingmachinelearningaverageclimateversusextremes
AT skarpaasolav identifyingclimatethresholdsfordominantnaturalvegetationtypesattheglobalscaleusingmachinelearningaverageclimateversusextremes
AT stordalfrode identifyingclimatethresholdsfordominantnaturalvegetationtypesattheglobalscaleusingmachinelearningaverageclimateversusextremes
AT bjerkejarlew identifyingclimatethresholdsfordominantnaturalvegetationtypesattheglobalscaleusingmachinelearningaverageclimateversusextremes
AT zliobaiteindre identifyingclimatethresholdsfordominantnaturalvegetationtypesattheglobalscaleusingmachinelearningaverageclimateversusextremes