Cargando…

Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) report frequent adverse skin reactions (ASRs) due to face personal protective equipment (F‐PPE) use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To describe self‐reported ASRs among HCWs using F‐PPE; investigate background factors, such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skiveren, Jette G., Ryborg, Malene F., Nilausen, Britt, Bermark, Susan, Philipsen, Peter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34865243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14022
_version_ 1784751755060314112
author Skiveren, Jette G.
Ryborg, Malene F.
Nilausen, Britt
Bermark, Susan
Philipsen, Peter A.
author_facet Skiveren, Jette G.
Ryborg, Malene F.
Nilausen, Britt
Bermark, Susan
Philipsen, Peter A.
author_sort Skiveren, Jette G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) report frequent adverse skin reactions (ASRs) due to face personal protective equipment (F‐PPE) use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To describe self‐reported ASRs among HCWs using F‐PPE; investigate background factors, such as chronic skin diseases and skin types (dry, oily, combination, sensitive), and determine whether HCWs took preventive methods against ASRs. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to 22 993 HCWs at hospitals. RESULTS: The prevalence of ASRs was 61.9% based on 10 287 responders. Different types of F‐PPE caused different reactions. The most common ASRs from surgical masks were spots and pimples (37.2%) and from FFP3 masks was red and irritated skin (27.3%). A significantly higher proportion of HCWs with chronic skin diseases had ASRs (71.6%) than those without chronic skin diseases (59.7%) (P < .001). Some skin types were more prone to ASRs (sensitive skin [78.8%] vs dry skin [54.3%]; P = .001). HCWs using F‐PPE for >6 hours versus <3 hours per day had a four times higher ASR risk (P = <.001). Nearly all HCWs used preventive and/or counteractive methods (94.2%). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to consider background factors, such as chronic skin diseases and skin types, to prevent and counteract ASRs due to F‐PPE use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9302995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93029952022-07-22 Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark Skiveren, Jette G. Ryborg, Malene F. Nilausen, Britt Bermark, Susan Philipsen, Peter A. Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) report frequent adverse skin reactions (ASRs) due to face personal protective equipment (F‐PPE) use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To describe self‐reported ASRs among HCWs using F‐PPE; investigate background factors, such as chronic skin diseases and skin types (dry, oily, combination, sensitive), and determine whether HCWs took preventive methods against ASRs. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to 22 993 HCWs at hospitals. RESULTS: The prevalence of ASRs was 61.9% based on 10 287 responders. Different types of F‐PPE caused different reactions. The most common ASRs from surgical masks were spots and pimples (37.2%) and from FFP3 masks was red and irritated skin (27.3%). A significantly higher proportion of HCWs with chronic skin diseases had ASRs (71.6%) than those without chronic skin diseases (59.7%) (P < .001). Some skin types were more prone to ASRs (sensitive skin [78.8%] vs dry skin [54.3%]; P = .001). HCWs using F‐PPE for >6 hours versus <3 hours per day had a four times higher ASR risk (P = <.001). Nearly all HCWs used preventive and/or counteractive methods (94.2%). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to consider background factors, such as chronic skin diseases and skin types, to prevent and counteract ASRs due to F‐PPE use. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-12-27 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9302995/ /pubmed/34865243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14022 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Skiveren, Jette G.
Ryborg, Malene F.
Nilausen, Britt
Bermark, Susan
Philipsen, Peter A.
Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark
title Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark
title_full Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark
title_fullStr Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark
title_short Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark
title_sort adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a cross‐sectional survey of six hospitals in denmark
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34865243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.14022
work_keys_str_mv AT skiverenjetteg adverseskinreactionsamonghealthcareworkersusingfacepersonalprotectiveequipmentduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicacrosssectionalsurveyofsixhospitalsindenmark
AT ryborgmalenef adverseskinreactionsamonghealthcareworkersusingfacepersonalprotectiveequipmentduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicacrosssectionalsurveyofsixhospitalsindenmark
AT nilausenbritt adverseskinreactionsamonghealthcareworkersusingfacepersonalprotectiveequipmentduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicacrosssectionalsurveyofsixhospitalsindenmark
AT bermarksusan adverseskinreactionsamonghealthcareworkersusingfacepersonalprotectiveequipmentduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicacrosssectionalsurveyofsixhospitalsindenmark
AT philipsenpetera adverseskinreactionsamonghealthcareworkersusingfacepersonalprotectiveequipmentduringthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicacrosssectionalsurveyofsixhospitalsindenmark