Cargando…

Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment: Developed and Validated from 1,017 Medical and Surgical Patients

Background  The Caprini Risk Score (CRS) is one of the most widely used risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism (VTE). A well-validated patient-completed CRS form may allow patients to self-report and simplify the evaluation by health care workers. Methods  The Chinese version of the CRS w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhu, Wu, Yifan, Liu, Qingxia, Dong, Fen, Pang, Wenyi, Zhe, Kaiyuan, Wan, Jun, Xie, Wanmu, Wang, Wei, Yang, Peiran, Sun, Aihua, Zhai, Zhenguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36046202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749170
Descripción
Sumario:Background  The Caprini Risk Score (CRS) is one of the most widely used risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism (VTE). A well-validated patient-completed CRS form may allow patients to self-report and simplify the evaluation by health care workers. Methods  The Chinese version of the CRS was optimized for easy understanding in a pilot study. The amended CRS form was completed by prospectively recruited patients and blinded nurses. The agreement levels of the individual questions and the total scores of patient and nurse-completed forms were compared using the Kappa value. The total scores were used for risk stratification of patients. Correlation and differences between patient and nurse-completed forms were analyzed using the Spearman correlation and Bland–Altman method, respectively. Results  We recruited 504 medical patients and 513 surgical patients, aged 52.7 ± 16.3 years, of which 443 (43.6%) were men, and 91.6% of the patients were educated beyond junior high school. The patients spent less time to complete the form compared with trained nurses. There was good question-to-question agreement between patient and nurse-completed CRS ( k >0.6 for most questions, p  < 0.0001). The total scores also showed good agreement ( k  = 0.6097, p  < 0.0001), and enabled the classification of patients into different risk groups. The patient and nurse-derived scores were highly correlated (Spearman's r  = 0.84), and without extreme values ( p  < 0.0001). Conclusion  We have created and verified a Chinese version of the patient-completed CRS, which showed good agreement and correlation with nurse-completed CRS. CRS represents a suitable tool for VTE risk assessment of hospitalized patients in China.