Cargando…

Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles of Thrombospondin-2 in Digestive System Cancers

BACKGROUND: Cancers of digestive system have high case-fatality rate. It is important to find more appropriate methods in diagnosing and predicting gastrointestinal malignances. And thrombospondin-2 (TSP-2) was reported to have the functions, although results were not identical. So we performed this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Feiqiong, Chen, Wenyi, Zhao, Tingxiao, Yu, Jiong, Feng, Xudong, Wang, Lan, Jiang, Tianan, Cao, Hongcui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35872838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3749306
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cancers of digestive system have high case-fatality rate. It is important to find more appropriate methods in diagnosing and predicting gastrointestinal malignances. And thrombospondin-2 (TSP-2) was reported to have the functions, although results were not identical. So we performed this meta-analysis to clarify the significance of TSP-2 in this area. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrial.gov were searched for relevant studies. Data were extracted from these involved records. For the meta-analysis of diagnostic test, bivariate mixed effect model was used to estimate diagnostic accuracy. For prognosis part, HRs and their 95% CIs were pooled to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with high TSP-2 and low TSP-2. RESULTS: Nine records were eligible for the analysis of diagnostic test. Pooled results were as follows: sensitivity 0.60 (0.52, 0.68), specificity 0.96 (0.91, 0.98), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) 15.4 (7.3, 32.2), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.42 (0.34, 0.50), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 37 (18, 76). While in prognosis part, 10 articles were included. Patients with increased TSP-2 had shorter OS (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.21-2.22); however, no difference was found in DFS between TSP-2 high and low groups (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.28-7.33). CONCLUSIONS: TSP-2, as a diagnostic marker, has a high specificity but a moderate sensitivity. Meanwhile, it plays a role in predicting OS. Therefore, making TSP-2 a routine assay could be beneficial to high-risk individuals and patients with digestive malignances.