Cargando…
Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the host‐ and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies. POPULATION: Fourteen parous fem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34865300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17040 |
_version_ | 1784751797128134656 |
---|---|
author | Diedrich, Chantal M. Guler, Zeliha Hympanova, Lucie Vodegel, Eva Zündel, Manuel Mazza, Edoardo Deprest, Jan Roovers, Jan Paul |
author_facet | Diedrich, Chantal M. Guler, Zeliha Hympanova, Lucie Vodegel, Eva Zündel, Manuel Mazza, Edoardo Deprest, Jan Roovers, Jan Paul |
author_sort | Diedrich, Chantal M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the host‐ and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies. POPULATION: Fourteen parous female Mule sheep. METHODS: P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60‐ and 180‐days post‐implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM). RESULTS: Gross necropsy revealed no implant‐related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180‐days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60‐days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post‐implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0–4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0–4) at 180‐days. CONCLUSIONS: P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load‐bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow‐up in‐vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9303173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93031732022-07-22 Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation Diedrich, Chantal M. Guler, Zeliha Hympanova, Lucie Vodegel, Eva Zündel, Manuel Mazza, Edoardo Deprest, Jan Roovers, Jan Paul BJOG RESEARCH ARTICLES OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the host‐ and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with the response to polypropylene (PP) mesh. DESIGN: In vivo animal experiment. SETTING: KU Leuven Center for Surgical Technologies. POPULATION: Fourteen parous female Mule sheep. METHODS: P4HB scaffolds were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of sheep. The comparative PP mesh data were obtained from an identical study protocol performed previously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gross necropsy, host response and biomechanical evaluation of explants, and the in vivo P4HB scaffold degradation were evaluated at 60‐ and 180‐days post‐implantation. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM). RESULTS: Gross necropsy revealed no implant‐related adverse events using P4HB scaffolds. The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants increased at 180‐days (12.498 ± 2.66 N/mm SEM [p =0.019]) as compared to 60‐days (4.585 ± 1.57 N/mm) post‐implantation, while P4HB degraded gradually. P4HB scaffolds exhibited excellent tissue integration with dense connective tissue and a moderate initial host response. P4HB scaffolds induced a significantly higher M2/M1 ratio (1.70 ± 0.67 SD, score 0–4), as compared to PP mesh(0.99 ± 0.78 SD, score 0–4) at 180‐days. CONCLUSIONS: P4HB scaffold facilitated a gradual load transfer to vaginal tissue over time. The fully absorbable P4HB scaffold, in comparison to PP mesh, has a favorable host response with comparable load‐bearing capacity. If these results are also observed at longer follow‐up in‐vivo, a clinical study using P4HB for vaginal POP surgery may be warranted to demonstrate efficacy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Degradable vaginal P4HB implant might be a solution for treatment of POP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-29 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9303173/ /pubmed/34865300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17040 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Diedrich, Chantal M. Guler, Zeliha Hympanova, Lucie Vodegel, Eva Zündel, Manuel Mazza, Edoardo Deprest, Jan Roovers, Jan Paul Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation |
title | Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation |
title_full | Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation |
title_short | Evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation |
title_sort | evaluation of the short‐term host response and biomechanics of an absorbable poly‐4‐hydroxybutyrate scaffold in a sheep model following vaginal implantation |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34865300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diedrichchantalm evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation AT gulerzeliha evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation AT hympanovalucie evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation AT vodegeleva evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation AT zundelmanuel evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation AT mazzaedoardo evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation AT deprestjan evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation AT rooversjanpaul evaluationoftheshorttermhostresponseandbiomechanicsofanabsorbablepoly4hydroxybutyratescaffoldinasheepmodelfollowingvaginalimplantation |