Cargando…

Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey

PURPOSE: As the landscape in ophthalmology and related commissioning continues to change, there is a pressing need to re‐evaluate the current scope of practice of hospital optometrists working within secondary care in the UK. We aim to establish if the skills or services delivered by optometrists ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunn, Patrick J G, Creer, Rosalind C, Bowen, Michael, Tromans, Cindy, Jackson, Andrew Jonathan, Tompkin, Andrew P, Harper, Robert A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12952
_version_ 1784751807846678528
author Gunn, Patrick J G
Creer, Rosalind C
Bowen, Michael
Tromans, Cindy
Jackson, Andrew Jonathan
Tompkin, Andrew P
Harper, Robert A
author_facet Gunn, Patrick J G
Creer, Rosalind C
Bowen, Michael
Tromans, Cindy
Jackson, Andrew Jonathan
Tompkin, Andrew P
Harper, Robert A
author_sort Gunn, Patrick J G
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: As the landscape in ophthalmology and related commissioning continues to change, there is a pressing need to re‐evaluate the current scope of practice of hospital optometrists working within secondary care in the UK. We aim to establish if the skills or services delivered by optometrists have changed to meet varying demands, and to better understand what changes in practice may have arisen as a result of COVID‐19. METHOD: A survey developed from that used in 2015 was disseminated to 129 optometry Hospital Eye Service (HES) leads in September 2020, including questions on department workforce; core services; extended roles; procedures undertaken within extended roles; level of autonomy; arrangements for prescribing; training and accreditation, and service changes in response to COVID‐19. RESULTS: Ninety responses were received (70% response rate) from within England (76%), Scotland (22%) and Northern Ireland (2%). Whole time equivalents within units ranged from 0.4–79.2 (median of 2.5). In comparison to the 2015 survey, there was an increase in the proportion of units delivering extended roles, with glaucoma (88%) remaining the most common extended role, and new areas of practice in uveitis (21%) and vitreoretinal (13%) services. There was increased use of independent prescribing (67%) in comparison to 18% in 2015 and there was an increase in optometrists delivering laser interventions. In response to COVID‐19, optometrists were increasingly delivering telephone consultations and there were new collaborations between primary and secondary care. CONCLUSIONS: Optometrists’ scope of practice continues to develop in the HES with an increased variety of roles and an apparent increase in the number of units employing optometrists, often working in roles historically performed by medical practitioners. Such changes appear necessary in recovery and transformation within ophthalmology, alongside wider optometry changes arising at the interface of primary and secondary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9303216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93032162022-07-22 Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey Gunn, Patrick J G Creer, Rosalind C Bowen, Michael Tromans, Cindy Jackson, Andrew Jonathan Tompkin, Andrew P Harper, Robert A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Special Issue Articles PURPOSE: As the landscape in ophthalmology and related commissioning continues to change, there is a pressing need to re‐evaluate the current scope of practice of hospital optometrists working within secondary care in the UK. We aim to establish if the skills or services delivered by optometrists have changed to meet varying demands, and to better understand what changes in practice may have arisen as a result of COVID‐19. METHOD: A survey developed from that used in 2015 was disseminated to 129 optometry Hospital Eye Service (HES) leads in September 2020, including questions on department workforce; core services; extended roles; procedures undertaken within extended roles; level of autonomy; arrangements for prescribing; training and accreditation, and service changes in response to COVID‐19. RESULTS: Ninety responses were received (70% response rate) from within England (76%), Scotland (22%) and Northern Ireland (2%). Whole time equivalents within units ranged from 0.4–79.2 (median of 2.5). In comparison to the 2015 survey, there was an increase in the proportion of units delivering extended roles, with glaucoma (88%) remaining the most common extended role, and new areas of practice in uveitis (21%) and vitreoretinal (13%) services. There was increased use of independent prescribing (67%) in comparison to 18% in 2015 and there was an increase in optometrists delivering laser interventions. In response to COVID‐19, optometrists were increasingly delivering telephone consultations and there were new collaborations between primary and secondary care. CONCLUSIONS: Optometrists’ scope of practice continues to develop in the HES with an increased variety of roles and an apparent increase in the number of units employing optometrists, often working in roles historically performed by medical practitioners. Such changes appear necessary in recovery and transformation within ophthalmology, alongside wider optometry changes arising at the interface of primary and secondary care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-12 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9303216/ /pubmed/35150447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12952 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue Articles
Gunn, Patrick J G
Creer, Rosalind C
Bowen, Michael
Tromans, Cindy
Jackson, Andrew Jonathan
Tompkin, Andrew P
Harper, Robert A
Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey
title Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey
title_full Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey
title_fullStr Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey
title_full_unstemmed Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey
title_short Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey
title_sort scope of practice of optometrists working in the uk hospital eye service: second national survey
topic Special Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.12952
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnpatrickjg scopeofpracticeofoptometristsworkingintheukhospitaleyeservicesecondnationalsurvey
AT creerrosalindc scopeofpracticeofoptometristsworkingintheukhospitaleyeservicesecondnationalsurvey
AT bowenmichael scopeofpracticeofoptometristsworkingintheukhospitaleyeservicesecondnationalsurvey
AT tromanscindy scopeofpracticeofoptometristsworkingintheukhospitaleyeservicesecondnationalsurvey
AT jacksonandrewjonathan scopeofpracticeofoptometristsworkingintheukhospitaleyeservicesecondnationalsurvey
AT tompkinandrewp scopeofpracticeofoptometristsworkingintheukhospitaleyeservicesecondnationalsurvey
AT harperroberta scopeofpracticeofoptometristsworkingintheukhospitaleyeservicesecondnationalsurvey