Cargando…
Development and validation of a multivariable prediction model in open abdomen patients for entero‐atmospheric fistula
BACKGROUND: Laparostomy or Open Abdomen (OA) has matured into an effective strategy in the management of abdominal catastrophe. Single prognostic factors have been identified in a previous systematic review regarding entero‐atmospheric fistula (EAF). Unfortunately, no prognostic multivariable model...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.17512 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Laparostomy or Open Abdomen (OA) has matured into an effective strategy in the management of abdominal catastrophe. Single prognostic factors have been identified in a previous systematic review regarding entero‐atmospheric fistula (EAF). Unfortunately, no prognostic multivariable model for EAF exist. The aim was to develop and validate a multivariable prediction model from a retrospective cohort study involving three hospital's databases. METHODS: Fifty‐seven variables were evaluated to develop a multivariable model. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for on a developmental data set from two hospitals. Receiver operator characteristics analysis with area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed on the developmental data set (internal validation) as well as on an additional validation data set from another hospital (external validation). RESULTS: Five‐hundred and forty‐eight patients managed with an OA. Two variables remained in the multivariable prediction model for EAF. The AUC for EAF on internal validation were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58–0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67–0.92) on external validation. CONCLUSIONS: A multivariable prediction model for EAF was externally validated and an easy‐to‐use probability nomogram was constructed using the two predictor variables. Level of evidence: III; prognostic. |
---|