Cargando…
A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
Conservation technology holds the potential to vastly increase conservationists’ ability to understand and address critical environmental challenges, but systemic constraints appear to hamper its development and adoption. Understanding of these constraints and opportunities for advancement remains l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13871 |
_version_ | 1784751863423303680 |
---|---|
author | Speaker, Talia O'Donnell, Stephanie Wittemyer, George Bruyere, Brett Loucks, Colby Dancer, Anthony Carter, Marianne Fegraus, Eric Palmer, Jonathan Warren, Ellie Solomon, Jennifer |
author_facet | Speaker, Talia O'Donnell, Stephanie Wittemyer, George Bruyere, Brett Loucks, Colby Dancer, Anthony Carter, Marianne Fegraus, Eric Palmer, Jonathan Warren, Ellie Solomon, Jennifer |
author_sort | Speaker, Talia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conservation technology holds the potential to vastly increase conservationists’ ability to understand and address critical environmental challenges, but systemic constraints appear to hamper its development and adoption. Understanding of these constraints and opportunities for advancement remains limited. We conducted a global online survey of 248 conservation technology users and developers to identify perceptions of existing tools’ current performance and potential impact, user and developer constraints, and key opportunities for growth. We also conducted focus groups with 45 leading experts to triangulate findings. The technologies with the highest perceived potential were machine learning and computer vision, eDNA and genomics, and networked sensors. A total of 95%, 94%, and 92% respondents, respectively, rated them as very helpful or game changers. The most pressing challenges affecting the field as a whole were competition for limited funding, duplication of efforts, and inadequate capacity building. A total of 76%, 67%, and 55% respondents, respectively, identified these as primary concerns. The key opportunities for growth identified in focus groups were increasing collaboration and information sharing, improving the interoperability of tools, and enhancing capacity for data analyses at scale. Some constraints appeared to disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Respondents in countries with developing economies were more likely to report being constrained by upfront costs, maintenance costs, and development funding (p = 0.048, odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; p = 0.005, OR = 4.23; p = 0.024, OR = 4.26), and female respondents were more likely to report being constrained by development funding and perceived technical skills (p = 0.027, OR = 3.98; p = 0.048, OR = 2.33). To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to formally capture the perspectives and needs of the global conservation technology community, providing foundational data that can serve as a benchmark to measure progress. We see tremendous potential for this community to further the vision they define, in which collaboration trumps competition; solutions are open, accessible, and interoperable; and user‐friendly processing tools empower the rapid translation of data into conservation action. Article impact statement: Addressing financing, coordination, and capacity‐building constraints is critical to the development and adoption of conservation technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9303432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93034322022-07-22 A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology Speaker, Talia O'Donnell, Stephanie Wittemyer, George Bruyere, Brett Loucks, Colby Dancer, Anthony Carter, Marianne Fegraus, Eric Palmer, Jonathan Warren, Ellie Solomon, Jennifer Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Conservation technology holds the potential to vastly increase conservationists’ ability to understand and address critical environmental challenges, but systemic constraints appear to hamper its development and adoption. Understanding of these constraints and opportunities for advancement remains limited. We conducted a global online survey of 248 conservation technology users and developers to identify perceptions of existing tools’ current performance and potential impact, user and developer constraints, and key opportunities for growth. We also conducted focus groups with 45 leading experts to triangulate findings. The technologies with the highest perceived potential were machine learning and computer vision, eDNA and genomics, and networked sensors. A total of 95%, 94%, and 92% respondents, respectively, rated them as very helpful or game changers. The most pressing challenges affecting the field as a whole were competition for limited funding, duplication of efforts, and inadequate capacity building. A total of 76%, 67%, and 55% respondents, respectively, identified these as primary concerns. The key opportunities for growth identified in focus groups were increasing collaboration and information sharing, improving the interoperability of tools, and enhancing capacity for data analyses at scale. Some constraints appeared to disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Respondents in countries with developing economies were more likely to report being constrained by upfront costs, maintenance costs, and development funding (p = 0.048, odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; p = 0.005, OR = 4.23; p = 0.024, OR = 4.26), and female respondents were more likely to report being constrained by development funding and perceived technical skills (p = 0.027, OR = 3.98; p = 0.048, OR = 2.33). To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to formally capture the perspectives and needs of the global conservation technology community, providing foundational data that can serve as a benchmark to measure progress. We see tremendous potential for this community to further the vision they define, in which collaboration trumps competition; solutions are open, accessible, and interoperable; and user‐friendly processing tools empower the rapid translation of data into conservation action. Article impact statement: Addressing financing, coordination, and capacity‐building constraints is critical to the development and adoption of conservation technology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-03 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9303432/ /pubmed/34904294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13871 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Contributed Papers Speaker, Talia O'Donnell, Stephanie Wittemyer, George Bruyere, Brett Loucks, Colby Dancer, Anthony Carter, Marianne Fegraus, Eric Palmer, Jonathan Warren, Ellie Solomon, Jennifer A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology |
title | A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology |
title_full | A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology |
title_fullStr | A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology |
title_full_unstemmed | A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology |
title_short | A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology |
title_sort | global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology |
topic | Contributed Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT speakertalia aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT odonnellstephanie aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT wittemyergeorge aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT bruyerebrett aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT louckscolby aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT danceranthony aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT cartermarianne aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT fegrauseric aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT palmerjonathan aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT warrenellie aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT solomonjennifer aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT speakertalia globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT odonnellstephanie globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT wittemyergeorge globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT bruyerebrett globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT louckscolby globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT danceranthony globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT cartermarianne globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT fegrauseric globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT palmerjonathan globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT warrenellie globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology AT solomonjennifer globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology |