Cargando…

A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology

Conservation technology holds the potential to vastly increase conservationists’ ability to understand and address critical environmental challenges, but systemic constraints appear to hamper its development and adoption. Understanding of these constraints and opportunities for advancement remains l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speaker, Talia, O'Donnell, Stephanie, Wittemyer, George, Bruyere, Brett, Loucks, Colby, Dancer, Anthony, Carter, Marianne, Fegraus, Eric, Palmer, Jonathan, Warren, Ellie, Solomon, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13871
_version_ 1784751863423303680
author Speaker, Talia
O'Donnell, Stephanie
Wittemyer, George
Bruyere, Brett
Loucks, Colby
Dancer, Anthony
Carter, Marianne
Fegraus, Eric
Palmer, Jonathan
Warren, Ellie
Solomon, Jennifer
author_facet Speaker, Talia
O'Donnell, Stephanie
Wittemyer, George
Bruyere, Brett
Loucks, Colby
Dancer, Anthony
Carter, Marianne
Fegraus, Eric
Palmer, Jonathan
Warren, Ellie
Solomon, Jennifer
author_sort Speaker, Talia
collection PubMed
description Conservation technology holds the potential to vastly increase conservationists’ ability to understand and address critical environmental challenges, but systemic constraints appear to hamper its development and adoption. Understanding of these constraints and opportunities for advancement remains limited. We conducted a global online survey of 248 conservation technology users and developers to identify perceptions of existing tools’ current performance and potential impact, user and developer constraints, and key opportunities for growth. We also conducted focus groups with 45 leading experts to triangulate findings. The technologies with the highest perceived potential were machine learning and computer vision, eDNA and genomics, and networked sensors. A total of 95%, 94%, and 92% respondents, respectively, rated them as very helpful or game changers. The most pressing challenges affecting the field as a whole were competition for limited funding, duplication of efforts, and inadequate capacity building. A total of 76%, 67%, and 55% respondents, respectively, identified these as primary concerns. The key opportunities for growth identified in focus groups were increasing collaboration and information sharing, improving the interoperability of tools, and enhancing capacity for data analyses at scale. Some constraints appeared to disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Respondents in countries with developing economies were more likely to report being constrained by upfront costs, maintenance costs, and development funding (p = 0.048, odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; p = 0.005, OR = 4.23; p = 0.024, OR = 4.26), and female respondents were more likely to report being constrained by development funding and perceived technical skills (p = 0.027, OR = 3.98; p = 0.048, OR = 2.33). To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to formally capture the perspectives and needs of the global conservation technology community, providing foundational data that can serve as a benchmark to measure progress. We see tremendous potential for this community to further the vision they define, in which collaboration trumps competition; solutions are open, accessible, and interoperable; and user‐friendly processing tools empower the rapid translation of data into conservation action. Article impact statement: Addressing financing, coordination, and capacity‐building constraints is critical to the development and adoption of conservation technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9303432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93034322022-07-22 A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology Speaker, Talia O'Donnell, Stephanie Wittemyer, George Bruyere, Brett Loucks, Colby Dancer, Anthony Carter, Marianne Fegraus, Eric Palmer, Jonathan Warren, Ellie Solomon, Jennifer Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Conservation technology holds the potential to vastly increase conservationists’ ability to understand and address critical environmental challenges, but systemic constraints appear to hamper its development and adoption. Understanding of these constraints and opportunities for advancement remains limited. We conducted a global online survey of 248 conservation technology users and developers to identify perceptions of existing tools’ current performance and potential impact, user and developer constraints, and key opportunities for growth. We also conducted focus groups with 45 leading experts to triangulate findings. The technologies with the highest perceived potential were machine learning and computer vision, eDNA and genomics, and networked sensors. A total of 95%, 94%, and 92% respondents, respectively, rated them as very helpful or game changers. The most pressing challenges affecting the field as a whole were competition for limited funding, duplication of efforts, and inadequate capacity building. A total of 76%, 67%, and 55% respondents, respectively, identified these as primary concerns. The key opportunities for growth identified in focus groups were increasing collaboration and information sharing, improving the interoperability of tools, and enhancing capacity for data analyses at scale. Some constraints appeared to disproportionately affect marginalized groups. Respondents in countries with developing economies were more likely to report being constrained by upfront costs, maintenance costs, and development funding (p = 0.048, odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; p = 0.005, OR = 4.23; p = 0.024, OR = 4.26), and female respondents were more likely to report being constrained by development funding and perceived technical skills (p = 0.027, OR = 3.98; p = 0.048, OR = 2.33). To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to formally capture the perspectives and needs of the global conservation technology community, providing foundational data that can serve as a benchmark to measure progress. We see tremendous potential for this community to further the vision they define, in which collaboration trumps competition; solutions are open, accessible, and interoperable; and user‐friendly processing tools empower the rapid translation of data into conservation action. Article impact statement: Addressing financing, coordination, and capacity‐building constraints is critical to the development and adoption of conservation technology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-03 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9303432/ /pubmed/34904294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13871 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Contributed Papers
Speaker, Talia
O'Donnell, Stephanie
Wittemyer, George
Bruyere, Brett
Loucks, Colby
Dancer, Anthony
Carter, Marianne
Fegraus, Eric
Palmer, Jonathan
Warren, Ellie
Solomon, Jennifer
A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
title A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
title_full A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
title_fullStr A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
title_full_unstemmed A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
title_short A global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
title_sort global community‐sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology
topic Contributed Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13871
work_keys_str_mv AT speakertalia aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT odonnellstephanie aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT wittemyergeorge aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT bruyerebrett aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT louckscolby aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT danceranthony aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT cartermarianne aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT fegrauseric aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT palmerjonathan aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT warrenellie aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT solomonjennifer aglobalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT speakertalia globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT odonnellstephanie globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT wittemyergeorge globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT bruyerebrett globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT louckscolby globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT danceranthony globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT cartermarianne globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT fegrauseric globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT palmerjonathan globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT warrenellie globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology
AT solomonjennifer globalcommunitysourcedassessmentofthestateofconservationtechnology