Cargando…

Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases

The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinert, Thomas, Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj, Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman, Larsen, Marie Øbo, Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov, Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll, Øgaard, Nadia, Knudsen, Michael, Nordentoft, Iver, Vang, Søren, Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund, Knudsen, Anders Riegels, Mortensen, Frank Viborg, Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33924
_version_ 1784751870710906880
author Reinert, Thomas
Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj
Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman
Larsen, Marie Øbo
Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov
Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll
Øgaard, Nadia
Knudsen, Michael
Nordentoft, Iver
Vang, Søren
Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund
Knudsen, Anders Riegels
Mortensen, Frank Viborg
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
author_facet Reinert, Thomas
Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj
Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman
Larsen, Marie Øbo
Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov
Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll
Øgaard, Nadia
Knudsen, Michael
Nordentoft, Iver
Vang, Søren
Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund
Knudsen, Anders Riegels
Mortensen, Frank Viborg
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
author_sort Reinert, Thomas
collection PubMed
description The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too late to resume curative treatment. This longitudinal cohort study enrolled 115 patients with plasma samples (N = 439) prospectively collected before surgery, postoperatively at day 30 and every third month for up to 3 years. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to monitor serial plasma samples for somatic mutations. Assessment of ctDNA status either immediately after surgery, or serially during surveillance, stratified the patients into groups of high and low recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; 95% CI, 3.0‐19.7; P < .0001; and HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.3‐8.1; P < .0001, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ctDNA was 100% in all postoperative analyses. In multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status was the only consistently significant risk marker associated with relapse (P < .0001). Indeterminate CT findings were observed for 30.8% (21/68) of patients. All patients (9/21) that were ctDNA positive at the time of the indeterminate CT scan later relapsed, contrasting 42.6% (5/12) of those ctDNA negative (P = .0046). Recurrence diagnoses in patients with indeterminate CT findings were delayed (median 2.8 months, P < .0001). ctDNA status is strongly associated with detection of minimal residual disease and early detection of relapse. Furthermore, ctDNA status can potentially contribute to clinical decision‐making in case of indeterminate CT findings, reducing time‐to‐intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9303459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93034592022-07-28 Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases Reinert, Thomas Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman Larsen, Marie Øbo Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll Øgaard, Nadia Knudsen, Michael Nordentoft, Iver Vang, Søren Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund Knudsen, Anders Riegels Mortensen, Frank Viborg Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg Int J Cancer Tumor Markers and Signatures The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too late to resume curative treatment. This longitudinal cohort study enrolled 115 patients with plasma samples (N = 439) prospectively collected before surgery, postoperatively at day 30 and every third month for up to 3 years. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to monitor serial plasma samples for somatic mutations. Assessment of ctDNA status either immediately after surgery, or serially during surveillance, stratified the patients into groups of high and low recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; 95% CI, 3.0‐19.7; P < .0001; and HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.3‐8.1; P < .0001, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ctDNA was 100% in all postoperative analyses. In multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status was the only consistently significant risk marker associated with relapse (P < .0001). Indeterminate CT findings were observed for 30.8% (21/68) of patients. All patients (9/21) that were ctDNA positive at the time of the indeterminate CT scan later relapsed, contrasting 42.6% (5/12) of those ctDNA negative (P = .0046). Recurrence diagnoses in patients with indeterminate CT findings were delayed (median 2.8 months, P < .0001). ctDNA status is strongly associated with detection of minimal residual disease and early detection of relapse. Furthermore, ctDNA status can potentially contribute to clinical decision‐making in case of indeterminate CT findings, reducing time‐to‐intervention. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-01-19 2022-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9303459/ /pubmed/34994972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33924 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Tumor Markers and Signatures
Reinert, Thomas
Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj
Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman
Larsen, Marie Øbo
Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov
Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll
Øgaard, Nadia
Knudsen, Michael
Nordentoft, Iver
Vang, Søren
Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund
Knudsen, Anders Riegels
Mortensen, Frank Viborg
Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg
Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
title Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_full Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_fullStr Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_full_unstemmed Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_short Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
title_sort circulating tumor dna for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
topic Tumor Markers and Signatures
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33924
work_keys_str_mv AT reinertthomas circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT petersenlenamarieskindhøj circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT henriksentennavesterman circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT larsenmarieøbo circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT rasmussenmadsheilskov circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT johansenamandafrydendahlboll circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT øgaardnadia circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT knudsenmichael circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT nordentoftiver circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT vangsøren circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT kragsørenrasmuspalmelund circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT knudsenandersriegels circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT mortensenfrankviborg circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases
AT andersenclauslindbjerg circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases