Cargando…
Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases
The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too la...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33924 |
_version_ | 1784751870710906880 |
---|---|
author | Reinert, Thomas Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman Larsen, Marie Øbo Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll Øgaard, Nadia Knudsen, Michael Nordentoft, Iver Vang, Søren Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund Knudsen, Anders Riegels Mortensen, Frank Viborg Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg |
author_facet | Reinert, Thomas Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman Larsen, Marie Øbo Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll Øgaard, Nadia Knudsen, Michael Nordentoft, Iver Vang, Søren Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund Knudsen, Anders Riegels Mortensen, Frank Viborg Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg |
author_sort | Reinert, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too late to resume curative treatment. This longitudinal cohort study enrolled 115 patients with plasma samples (N = 439) prospectively collected before surgery, postoperatively at day 30 and every third month for up to 3 years. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to monitor serial plasma samples for somatic mutations. Assessment of ctDNA status either immediately after surgery, or serially during surveillance, stratified the patients into groups of high and low recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; 95% CI, 3.0‐19.7; P < .0001; and HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.3‐8.1; P < .0001, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ctDNA was 100% in all postoperative analyses. In multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status was the only consistently significant risk marker associated with relapse (P < .0001). Indeterminate CT findings were observed for 30.8% (21/68) of patients. All patients (9/21) that were ctDNA positive at the time of the indeterminate CT scan later relapsed, contrasting 42.6% (5/12) of those ctDNA negative (P = .0046). Recurrence diagnoses in patients with indeterminate CT findings were delayed (median 2.8 months, P < .0001). ctDNA status is strongly associated with detection of minimal residual disease and early detection of relapse. Furthermore, ctDNA status can potentially contribute to clinical decision‐making in case of indeterminate CT findings, reducing time‐to‐intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9303459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93034592022-07-28 Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases Reinert, Thomas Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman Larsen, Marie Øbo Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll Øgaard, Nadia Knudsen, Michael Nordentoft, Iver Vang, Søren Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund Knudsen, Anders Riegels Mortensen, Frank Viborg Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg Int J Cancer Tumor Markers and Signatures The recurrence rate of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients treated with curative intent is above 50%. Standard of care surveillance includes intensive computed tomographic (CT) imaging as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurements. Nonetheless, relapse detection often happens too late to resume curative treatment. This longitudinal cohort study enrolled 115 patients with plasma samples (N = 439) prospectively collected before surgery, postoperatively at day 30 and every third month for up to 3 years. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to monitor serial plasma samples for somatic mutations. Assessment of ctDNA status either immediately after surgery, or serially during surveillance, stratified the patients into groups of high and low recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; 95% CI, 3.0‐19.7; P < .0001; and HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.3‐8.1; P < .0001, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ctDNA was 100% in all postoperative analyses. In multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status was the only consistently significant risk marker associated with relapse (P < .0001). Indeterminate CT findings were observed for 30.8% (21/68) of patients. All patients (9/21) that were ctDNA positive at the time of the indeterminate CT scan later relapsed, contrasting 42.6% (5/12) of those ctDNA negative (P = .0046). Recurrence diagnoses in patients with indeterminate CT findings were delayed (median 2.8 months, P < .0001). ctDNA status is strongly associated with detection of minimal residual disease and early detection of relapse. Furthermore, ctDNA status can potentially contribute to clinical decision‐making in case of indeterminate CT findings, reducing time‐to‐intervention. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-01-19 2022-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9303459/ /pubmed/34994972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33924 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Tumor Markers and Signatures Reinert, Thomas Petersen, Lena Marie Skindhøj Henriksen, Tenna Vesterman Larsen, Marie Øbo Rasmussen, Mads Heilskov Johansen, Amanda Frydendahl Boll Øgaard, Nadia Knudsen, Michael Nordentoft, Iver Vang, Søren Krag, Søren Rasmus Palmelund Knudsen, Anders Riegels Mortensen, Frank Viborg Andersen, Claus Lindbjerg Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases |
title | Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases |
title_full | Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases |
title_fullStr | Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases |
title_short | Circulating tumor DNA for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases |
title_sort | circulating tumor dna for prognosis assessment and postoperative management after curative‐intent resection of colorectal liver metastases |
topic | Tumor Markers and Signatures |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reinertthomas circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT petersenlenamarieskindhøj circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT henriksentennavesterman circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT larsenmarieøbo circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT rasmussenmadsheilskov circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT johansenamandafrydendahlboll circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT øgaardnadia circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT knudsenmichael circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT nordentoftiver circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT vangsøren circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT kragsørenrasmuspalmelund circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT knudsenandersriegels circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT mortensenfrankviborg circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases AT andersenclauslindbjerg circulatingtumordnaforprognosisassessmentandpostoperativemanagementaftercurativeintentresectionofcolorectallivermetastases |