The novel left atrial strain parameters in diagnosing of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the ability of the novel LA strain parameters to discriminate patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) from individuals with risk factors of HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of n = 389 patients with risk factors for HFpEF finally was prospectively enrolled into the study, 66 of them were diagnosed with HFpEF by the 2021 ESC HF guidelines. Fifty‐five patients were undergone left ventricular catheterization and simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography was performed, 35 of them with elevated left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) was measured in all patients. LA filling index was defined as the ratio of mitral E and LASr and LA stiffness index was calculated as E/e′/LASr. Compared with the patients in the normal LVEDP subgroup, those in the elevated LVEDP subgroup showed significantly higher LA filling index, LA stiffness index, and LAVI/LASr. The receiver‐operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed LASr (area under curve [AUC] .840), LA filling index (AUC .843), LA stiffness index (AUC .766), and LAVI/LASr (AUC .755) had good diagnostic accuracy for elevated LVEDP. Inter‐technique agreement analysis showed the novel algorithms with LA strain parameters had good agreement with the invasive LVEDP measurement, better than the 2016 ASE/SCAI algorithms (kappa .711 vs. .101). Furthermore, compared with patients without HFpEF, LASr was lower in HFpEF, LA filling index, LA stiffness index, and LAVI/LASr was higher in patients with HFpEF. ROC analysis showed the novel LA strain parameters with good accuracy (AUC .756 to .821) non‐inferior to conventional echocardiographic parameters could identify HFpEF, and LA stiffness index (AUC .821) was the best one. CONCLUSION: The novel LA strain parameters could be of potential usefulness in estimating LVEDP and incorporated into the 2016 EACVI/ASE criteria would improve the diagnostic efficiency. The novel LA strain parameters with good accuracy non‐inferior to conventional echocardiographic parameters could discriminate HFpEF from patients with risk factors of HFpEF.