Cargando…

Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND: Individuals with Lynch syndrome are at high risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Regular colonoscopies have proven to decrease CRC incidence and mortality. However, colonoscopy is burdensome and interval CRCs still occur. Hence, an accurate, less‐invasive screening method that guides the ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Liere, Elsa L. S. A., de Boer, Nanne K. H., Dekker, Evelien, van Leerdam, Monique E., de Meij, Tim G. J., Ramsoekh, Dewkoemar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16824
_version_ 1784751918408531968
author van Liere, Elsa L. S. A.
de Boer, Nanne K. H.
Dekker, Evelien
van Leerdam, Monique E.
de Meij, Tim G. J.
Ramsoekh, Dewkoemar
author_facet van Liere, Elsa L. S. A.
de Boer, Nanne K. H.
Dekker, Evelien
van Leerdam, Monique E.
de Meij, Tim G. J.
Ramsoekh, Dewkoemar
author_sort van Liere, Elsa L. S. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals with Lynch syndrome are at high risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Regular colonoscopies have proven to decrease CRC incidence and mortality. However, colonoscopy is burdensome and interval CRCs still occur. Hence, an accurate, less‐invasive screening method that guides the timing of colonoscopy would be of important value. AIM: To outline the performance of non‐endoscopic screening modalities for Lynch‐associated CRC and adenomas. METHODS: Systematic literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies investigating imaging techniques and biomarkers for detection of CRC and adenomas in Lynch syndrome. The QUADAS‐2 tool was used for the quality assessment of included studies. RESULTS: Seven of 1332 screened articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two studies evaluated either CT colonography or MR colonography; both techniques were unable to detect CRC and (advanced) adenomas <10 mm. The other five studies evaluated plasma methylated‐SEPTIN9, faecal immunochemical test (FIT), faecal tumour DNA markers (BAT‐26, hMLH1, p53, D9S171, APC, D9S162, IFNA and DCC) and faecal microbiome as screening modalities. Sensitivity for CRC varied from 33% (BAT‐26) to 70% (methylated‐SEPTIN9) to 91% (hMLH1). High specificity (94–100%) for CRC and/or adenomas was observed for methylated‐SEPTIN9, FIT and BAT‐26. Desulfovibrio was enriched in the stool of patients having adenomas. However, all these studies were characterised by small populations, high/unclear risk of bias and/or low prevalence of adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging techniques are unsuitable for colon surveillance in Lynch syndrome, whereas biomarkers are understudied. Having outlined biomarker research in Lynch‐associated and sporadic CRC/adenomas, we believe that these non‐invasive markers may hold potential (whether or not combined) for this population. As they could be of great value, (pre‐)clinical studies in this field should be prioritised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9303645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93036452022-07-28 Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome van Liere, Elsa L. S. A. de Boer, Nanne K. H. Dekker, Evelien van Leerdam, Monique E. de Meij, Tim G. J. Ramsoekh, Dewkoemar Aliment Pharmacol Ther Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Individuals with Lynch syndrome are at high risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Regular colonoscopies have proven to decrease CRC incidence and mortality. However, colonoscopy is burdensome and interval CRCs still occur. Hence, an accurate, less‐invasive screening method that guides the timing of colonoscopy would be of important value. AIM: To outline the performance of non‐endoscopic screening modalities for Lynch‐associated CRC and adenomas. METHODS: Systematic literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies investigating imaging techniques and biomarkers for detection of CRC and adenomas in Lynch syndrome. The QUADAS‐2 tool was used for the quality assessment of included studies. RESULTS: Seven of 1332 screened articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Two studies evaluated either CT colonography or MR colonography; both techniques were unable to detect CRC and (advanced) adenomas <10 mm. The other five studies evaluated plasma methylated‐SEPTIN9, faecal immunochemical test (FIT), faecal tumour DNA markers (BAT‐26, hMLH1, p53, D9S171, APC, D9S162, IFNA and DCC) and faecal microbiome as screening modalities. Sensitivity for CRC varied from 33% (BAT‐26) to 70% (methylated‐SEPTIN9) to 91% (hMLH1). High specificity (94–100%) for CRC and/or adenomas was observed for methylated‐SEPTIN9, FIT and BAT‐26. Desulfovibrio was enriched in the stool of patients having adenomas. However, all these studies were characterised by small populations, high/unclear risk of bias and/or low prevalence of adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging techniques are unsuitable for colon surveillance in Lynch syndrome, whereas biomarkers are understudied. Having outlined biomarker research in Lynch‐associated and sporadic CRC/adenomas, we believe that these non‐invasive markers may hold potential (whether or not combined) for this population. As they could be of great value, (pre‐)clinical studies in this field should be prioritised. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-18 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9303645/ /pubmed/35181895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16824 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
van Liere, Elsa L. S. A.
de Boer, Nanne K. H.
Dekker, Evelien
van Leerdam, Monique E.
de Meij, Tim G. J.
Ramsoekh, Dewkoemar
Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome
title Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome
title_full Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome
title_fullStr Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome
title_short Systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome
title_sort systematic review: non‐endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in individuals with lynch syndrome
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16824
work_keys_str_mv AT vanliereelsalsa systematicreviewnonendoscopicsurveillanceforcolorectalneoplasiainindividualswithlynchsyndrome
AT deboernannekh systematicreviewnonendoscopicsurveillanceforcolorectalneoplasiainindividualswithlynchsyndrome
AT dekkerevelien systematicreviewnonendoscopicsurveillanceforcolorectalneoplasiainindividualswithlynchsyndrome
AT vanleerdammoniquee systematicreviewnonendoscopicsurveillanceforcolorectalneoplasiainindividualswithlynchsyndrome
AT demeijtimgj systematicreviewnonendoscopicsurveillanceforcolorectalneoplasiainindividualswithlynchsyndrome
AT ramsoekhdewkoemar systematicreviewnonendoscopicsurveillanceforcolorectalneoplasiainindividualswithlynchsyndrome