Cargando…

A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? First, we validated easy‐to‐use oscillometric left ventricular ejection time (LVET) against echocardiographic LVET. Second, we investigated progression of left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), total e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orter, Stefan, Möstl, Stefan, Bachler, Martin, Hoffmann, Fabian, Mayer, Christopher C., Kaniusas, Eugenijus, Reisinger, Michaela, Wassertheurer, Siegfried, Tank, Jens, Jordan, Jens, Hametner, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/EP090103
_version_ 1784751937742176256
author Orter, Stefan
Möstl, Stefan
Bachler, Martin
Hoffmann, Fabian
Mayer, Christopher C.
Kaniusas, Eugenijus
Reisinger, Michaela
Wassertheurer, Siegfried
Tank, Jens
Jordan, Jens
Hametner, Bernhard
author_facet Orter, Stefan
Möstl, Stefan
Bachler, Martin
Hoffmann, Fabian
Mayer, Christopher C.
Kaniusas, Eugenijus
Reisinger, Michaela
Wassertheurer, Siegfried
Tank, Jens
Jordan, Jens
Hametner, Bernhard
author_sort Orter, Stefan
collection PubMed
description NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? First, we validated easy‐to‐use oscillometric left ventricular ejection time (LVET) against echocardiographic LVET. Second, we investigated progression of left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) and PEP/LVET ratio during 60 days of head‐down tilt (HDT). What is the main finding and its importance? The LVET(osci) and LVET(echo) showed good agreement in effect direction. Hence, LVET(osci) might be useful to evaluate cardiovascular responses during space flight. Moreover, the approach might be useful for individual follow‐up of patients with altered ejection times. Furthermore, significant effects of 60 days of HDT were captured by measurements of LVETI, PEPI, QS2I and PEP/LVET ratio. ABSTRACT: Systolic time intervals that are easy to detect might be used as parameters reflecting cardiovascular deconditioning. We compared left ventricular ejection time (LVET) measured via ultrasound Doppler on the left ventricular outflow tract with oscillometrically measured LVET, measured at the brachialis. Furthermore, we assessed the progression of the left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), the pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), the Weissler index (PEP/LVET) and the total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) during prolonged strict head‐down tilt (HDT) bed rest, including 16 male and eight female subjects. Simultaneous oscillometric and echocardiographic LVET measurements showed significant correlation (r = 0.53 with P = 0.0084 before bed rest and r = 0.73 with P < 0.05 on the last day of bed rest). The shortening of LVET during HDT bed rest measured with both approaches was highly concordant in their effect direction, with a concordance rate of 0.96. Our results also demonstrated a significant decrease of LVETI (P < 0.0001) and QS2I (P = 0.0992) and a prolongation of PEPI (P = 0.0049) and PEP/LVET (P = 0.0003) during HDT bed rest over 60 days. Four days after bed rest, LVETI recovered completely to its baseline value. Owing to the relationship between shortening of LVETI and heart failure progression, the easy‐to‐use oscillometric method might not only be a useful way to evaluate the cardiovascular system during space flights, but could also be of high value in a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9303723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93037232022-07-28 A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity Orter, Stefan Möstl, Stefan Bachler, Martin Hoffmann, Fabian Mayer, Christopher C. Kaniusas, Eugenijus Reisinger, Michaela Wassertheurer, Siegfried Tank, Jens Jordan, Jens Hametner, Bernhard Exp Physiol RESEARCH PAPERS NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? First, we validated easy‐to‐use oscillometric left ventricular ejection time (LVET) against echocardiographic LVET. Second, we investigated progression of left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) and PEP/LVET ratio during 60 days of head‐down tilt (HDT). What is the main finding and its importance? The LVET(osci) and LVET(echo) showed good agreement in effect direction. Hence, LVET(osci) might be useful to evaluate cardiovascular responses during space flight. Moreover, the approach might be useful for individual follow‐up of patients with altered ejection times. Furthermore, significant effects of 60 days of HDT were captured by measurements of LVETI, PEPI, QS2I and PEP/LVET ratio. ABSTRACT: Systolic time intervals that are easy to detect might be used as parameters reflecting cardiovascular deconditioning. We compared left ventricular ejection time (LVET) measured via ultrasound Doppler on the left ventricular outflow tract with oscillometrically measured LVET, measured at the brachialis. Furthermore, we assessed the progression of the left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), the pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), the Weissler index (PEP/LVET) and the total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) during prolonged strict head‐down tilt (HDT) bed rest, including 16 male and eight female subjects. Simultaneous oscillometric and echocardiographic LVET measurements showed significant correlation (r = 0.53 with P = 0.0084 before bed rest and r = 0.73 with P < 0.05 on the last day of bed rest). The shortening of LVET during HDT bed rest measured with both approaches was highly concordant in their effect direction, with a concordance rate of 0.96. Our results also demonstrated a significant decrease of LVETI (P < 0.0001) and QS2I (P = 0.0992) and a prolongation of PEPI (P = 0.0049) and PEP/LVET (P = 0.0003) during HDT bed rest over 60 days. Four days after bed rest, LVETI recovered completely to its baseline value. Owing to the relationship between shortening of LVETI and heart failure progression, the easy‐to‐use oscillometric method might not only be a useful way to evaluate the cardiovascular system during space flights, but could also be of high value in a clinical setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-24 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9303723/ /pubmed/34921742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/EP090103 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle RESEARCH PAPERS
Orter, Stefan
Möstl, Stefan
Bachler, Martin
Hoffmann, Fabian
Mayer, Christopher C.
Kaniusas, Eugenijus
Reisinger, Michaela
Wassertheurer, Siegfried
Tank, Jens
Jordan, Jens
Hametner, Bernhard
A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
title A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
title_full A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
title_fullStr A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
title_short A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
title_sort comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
topic RESEARCH PAPERS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/EP090103
work_keys_str_mv AT orterstefan acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT mostlstefan acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT bachlermartin acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT hoffmannfabian acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT mayerchristopherc acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT kaniusaseugenijus acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT reisingermichaela acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT wassertheurersiegfried acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT tankjens acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT jordanjens acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT hametnerbernhard acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT orterstefan comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT mostlstefan comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT bachlermartin comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT hoffmannfabian comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT mayerchristopherc comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT kaniusaseugenijus comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT reisingermichaela comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT wassertheurersiegfried comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT tankjens comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT jordanjens comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity
AT hametnerbernhard comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity