Cargando…
A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity
NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? First, we validated easy‐to‐use oscillometric left ventricular ejection time (LVET) against echocardiographic LVET. Second, we investigated progression of left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), total e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/EP090103 |
_version_ | 1784751937742176256 |
---|---|
author | Orter, Stefan Möstl, Stefan Bachler, Martin Hoffmann, Fabian Mayer, Christopher C. Kaniusas, Eugenijus Reisinger, Michaela Wassertheurer, Siegfried Tank, Jens Jordan, Jens Hametner, Bernhard |
author_facet | Orter, Stefan Möstl, Stefan Bachler, Martin Hoffmann, Fabian Mayer, Christopher C. Kaniusas, Eugenijus Reisinger, Michaela Wassertheurer, Siegfried Tank, Jens Jordan, Jens Hametner, Bernhard |
author_sort | Orter, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? First, we validated easy‐to‐use oscillometric left ventricular ejection time (LVET) against echocardiographic LVET. Second, we investigated progression of left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) and PEP/LVET ratio during 60 days of head‐down tilt (HDT). What is the main finding and its importance? The LVET(osci) and LVET(echo) showed good agreement in effect direction. Hence, LVET(osci) might be useful to evaluate cardiovascular responses during space flight. Moreover, the approach might be useful for individual follow‐up of patients with altered ejection times. Furthermore, significant effects of 60 days of HDT were captured by measurements of LVETI, PEPI, QS2I and PEP/LVET ratio. ABSTRACT: Systolic time intervals that are easy to detect might be used as parameters reflecting cardiovascular deconditioning. We compared left ventricular ejection time (LVET) measured via ultrasound Doppler on the left ventricular outflow tract with oscillometrically measured LVET, measured at the brachialis. Furthermore, we assessed the progression of the left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), the pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), the Weissler index (PEP/LVET) and the total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) during prolonged strict head‐down tilt (HDT) bed rest, including 16 male and eight female subjects. Simultaneous oscillometric and echocardiographic LVET measurements showed significant correlation (r = 0.53 with P = 0.0084 before bed rest and r = 0.73 with P < 0.05 on the last day of bed rest). The shortening of LVET during HDT bed rest measured with both approaches was highly concordant in their effect direction, with a concordance rate of 0.96. Our results also demonstrated a significant decrease of LVETI (P < 0.0001) and QS2I (P = 0.0992) and a prolongation of PEPI (P = 0.0049) and PEP/LVET (P = 0.0003) during HDT bed rest over 60 days. Four days after bed rest, LVETI recovered completely to its baseline value. Owing to the relationship between shortening of LVETI and heart failure progression, the easy‐to‐use oscillometric method might not only be a useful way to evaluate the cardiovascular system during space flights, but could also be of high value in a clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9303723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93037232022-07-28 A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity Orter, Stefan Möstl, Stefan Bachler, Martin Hoffmann, Fabian Mayer, Christopher C. Kaniusas, Eugenijus Reisinger, Michaela Wassertheurer, Siegfried Tank, Jens Jordan, Jens Hametner, Bernhard Exp Physiol RESEARCH PAPERS NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? First, we validated easy‐to‐use oscillometric left ventricular ejection time (LVET) against echocardiographic LVET. Second, we investigated progression of left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) and PEP/LVET ratio during 60 days of head‐down tilt (HDT). What is the main finding and its importance? The LVET(osci) and LVET(echo) showed good agreement in effect direction. Hence, LVET(osci) might be useful to evaluate cardiovascular responses during space flight. Moreover, the approach might be useful for individual follow‐up of patients with altered ejection times. Furthermore, significant effects of 60 days of HDT were captured by measurements of LVETI, PEPI, QS2I and PEP/LVET ratio. ABSTRACT: Systolic time intervals that are easy to detect might be used as parameters reflecting cardiovascular deconditioning. We compared left ventricular ejection time (LVET) measured via ultrasound Doppler on the left ventricular outflow tract with oscillometrically measured LVET, measured at the brachialis. Furthermore, we assessed the progression of the left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), the pre‐ejection period index (PEPI), the Weissler index (PEP/LVET) and the total electromechanical systole index (QS2I) during prolonged strict head‐down tilt (HDT) bed rest, including 16 male and eight female subjects. Simultaneous oscillometric and echocardiographic LVET measurements showed significant correlation (r = 0.53 with P = 0.0084 before bed rest and r = 0.73 with P < 0.05 on the last day of bed rest). The shortening of LVET during HDT bed rest measured with both approaches was highly concordant in their effect direction, with a concordance rate of 0.96. Our results also demonstrated a significant decrease of LVETI (P < 0.0001) and QS2I (P = 0.0992) and a prolongation of PEPI (P = 0.0049) and PEP/LVET (P = 0.0003) during HDT bed rest over 60 days. Four days after bed rest, LVETI recovered completely to its baseline value. Owing to the relationship between shortening of LVETI and heart failure progression, the easy‐to‐use oscillometric method might not only be a useful way to evaluate the cardiovascular system during space flights, but could also be of high value in a clinical setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-24 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9303723/ /pubmed/34921742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/EP090103 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH PAPERS Orter, Stefan Möstl, Stefan Bachler, Martin Hoffmann, Fabian Mayer, Christopher C. Kaniusas, Eugenijus Reisinger, Michaela Wassertheurer, Siegfried Tank, Jens Jordan, Jens Hametner, Bernhard A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity |
title | A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity |
title_full | A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity |
title_fullStr | A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity |
title_short | A comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity |
title_sort | comparison between left ventricular ejection time measurement methods during physiological changes induced by simulated microgravity |
topic | RESEARCH PAPERS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34921742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/EP090103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orterstefan acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT mostlstefan acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT bachlermartin acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT hoffmannfabian acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT mayerchristopherc acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT kaniusaseugenijus acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT reisingermichaela acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT wassertheurersiegfried acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT tankjens acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT jordanjens acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT hametnerbernhard acomparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT orterstefan comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT mostlstefan comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT bachlermartin comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT hoffmannfabian comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT mayerchristopherc comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT kaniusaseugenijus comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT reisingermichaela comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT wassertheurersiegfried comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT tankjens comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT jordanjens comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity AT hametnerbernhard comparisonbetweenleftventricularejectiontimemeasurementmethodsduringphysiologicalchangesinducedbysimulatedmicrogravity |