Cargando…
Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review
Before the viability of a cell formulation can be assessed for implementation in commercial sodium ion batteries, processes applied in cell production should be validated and optimized. This review summarizes the steps performed in constructing sodium ion (Na‐ion) cells at research scale, highlighti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35032154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100860 |
_version_ | 1784751945176580096 |
---|---|
author | Sawhney, M. Anne Wahid, Malik Muhkerjee, Santanu Griffin, Rebecca Roberts, Alexander Ogale, Satishchandra Baker, Jenny |
author_facet | Sawhney, M. Anne Wahid, Malik Muhkerjee, Santanu Griffin, Rebecca Roberts, Alexander Ogale, Satishchandra Baker, Jenny |
author_sort | Sawhney, M. Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Before the viability of a cell formulation can be assessed for implementation in commercial sodium ion batteries, processes applied in cell production should be validated and optimized. This review summarizes the steps performed in constructing sodium ion (Na‐ion) cells at research scale, highlighting parameters and techniques that are likely to impact measured cycling performance. Consistent process‐structure‐performance links have been established for typical lithium‐ion (Li‐ion) cells, which can guide hypotheses to test in Na‐ion cells. Liquid electrolyte viscosity, sequence of mixing electrode slurries, rate of drying electrodes and cycling characteristics of formation were found critical to the reported capacity of laboratory cells. Based on the observed importance of processing to battery performance outcomes, the current focus on novel materials in Na‐ion research should be balanced with deeper investigation into mechanistic changes of cell components during and after production, to better inform future designs of these promising batteries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9303753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93037532022-07-28 Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review Sawhney, M. Anne Wahid, Malik Muhkerjee, Santanu Griffin, Rebecca Roberts, Alexander Ogale, Satishchandra Baker, Jenny Chemphyschem Reviews Before the viability of a cell formulation can be assessed for implementation in commercial sodium ion batteries, processes applied in cell production should be validated and optimized. This review summarizes the steps performed in constructing sodium ion (Na‐ion) cells at research scale, highlighting parameters and techniques that are likely to impact measured cycling performance. Consistent process‐structure‐performance links have been established for typical lithium‐ion (Li‐ion) cells, which can guide hypotheses to test in Na‐ion cells. Liquid electrolyte viscosity, sequence of mixing electrode slurries, rate of drying electrodes and cycling characteristics of formation were found critical to the reported capacity of laboratory cells. Based on the observed importance of processing to battery performance outcomes, the current focus on novel materials in Na‐ion research should be balanced with deeper investigation into mechanistic changes of cell components during and after production, to better inform future designs of these promising batteries. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-01 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9303753/ /pubmed/35032154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100860 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ChemPhysChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Sawhney, M. Anne Wahid, Malik Muhkerjee, Santanu Griffin, Rebecca Roberts, Alexander Ogale, Satishchandra Baker, Jenny Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review |
title | Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review |
title_full | Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review |
title_fullStr | Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review |
title_short | Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review |
title_sort | process‐structure‐formulation interactions for enhanced sodium ion battery development: a review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35032154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sawhneymanne processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview AT wahidmalik processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview AT muhkerjeesantanu processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview AT griffinrebecca processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview AT robertsalexander processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview AT ogalesatishchandra processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview AT bakerjenny processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview |