Cargando…

Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review

Before the viability of a cell formulation can be assessed for implementation in commercial sodium ion batteries, processes applied in cell production should be validated and optimized. This review summarizes the steps performed in constructing sodium ion (Na‐ion) cells at research scale, highlighti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawhney, M. Anne, Wahid, Malik, Muhkerjee, Santanu, Griffin, Rebecca, Roberts, Alexander, Ogale, Satishchandra, Baker, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35032154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100860
_version_ 1784751945176580096
author Sawhney, M. Anne
Wahid, Malik
Muhkerjee, Santanu
Griffin, Rebecca
Roberts, Alexander
Ogale, Satishchandra
Baker, Jenny
author_facet Sawhney, M. Anne
Wahid, Malik
Muhkerjee, Santanu
Griffin, Rebecca
Roberts, Alexander
Ogale, Satishchandra
Baker, Jenny
author_sort Sawhney, M. Anne
collection PubMed
description Before the viability of a cell formulation can be assessed for implementation in commercial sodium ion batteries, processes applied in cell production should be validated and optimized. This review summarizes the steps performed in constructing sodium ion (Na‐ion) cells at research scale, highlighting parameters and techniques that are likely to impact measured cycling performance. Consistent process‐structure‐performance links have been established for typical lithium‐ion (Li‐ion) cells, which can guide hypotheses to test in Na‐ion cells. Liquid electrolyte viscosity, sequence of mixing electrode slurries, rate of drying electrodes and cycling characteristics of formation were found critical to the reported capacity of laboratory cells. Based on the observed importance of processing to battery performance outcomes, the current focus on novel materials in Na‐ion research should be balanced with deeper investigation into mechanistic changes of cell components during and after production, to better inform future designs of these promising batteries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9303753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93037532022-07-28 Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review Sawhney, M. Anne Wahid, Malik Muhkerjee, Santanu Griffin, Rebecca Roberts, Alexander Ogale, Satishchandra Baker, Jenny Chemphyschem Reviews Before the viability of a cell formulation can be assessed for implementation in commercial sodium ion batteries, processes applied in cell production should be validated and optimized. This review summarizes the steps performed in constructing sodium ion (Na‐ion) cells at research scale, highlighting parameters and techniques that are likely to impact measured cycling performance. Consistent process‐structure‐performance links have been established for typical lithium‐ion (Li‐ion) cells, which can guide hypotheses to test in Na‐ion cells. Liquid electrolyte viscosity, sequence of mixing electrode slurries, rate of drying electrodes and cycling characteristics of formation were found critical to the reported capacity of laboratory cells. Based on the observed importance of processing to battery performance outcomes, the current focus on novel materials in Na‐ion research should be balanced with deeper investigation into mechanistic changes of cell components during and after production, to better inform future designs of these promising batteries. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-01 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9303753/ /pubmed/35032154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100860 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ChemPhysChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Sawhney, M. Anne
Wahid, Malik
Muhkerjee, Santanu
Griffin, Rebecca
Roberts, Alexander
Ogale, Satishchandra
Baker, Jenny
Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review
title Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review
title_full Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review
title_fullStr Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review
title_short Process‐Structure‐Formulation Interactions for Enhanced Sodium Ion Battery Development: A Review
title_sort process‐structure‐formulation interactions for enhanced sodium ion battery development: a review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35032154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100860
work_keys_str_mv AT sawhneymanne processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview
AT wahidmalik processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview
AT muhkerjeesantanu processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview
AT griffinrebecca processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview
AT robertsalexander processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview
AT ogalesatishchandra processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview
AT bakerjenny processstructureformulationinteractionsforenhancedsodiumionbatterydevelopmentareview