Cargando…

Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review

AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding rural healthcare delivery for women with any type of diabetes in pregnancy, and subsequent maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: Eight databases were searched in September 2020, including Medline, EMCare, CINAHL, EMBASE,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payne, Ellen, Palmer, Gwendolyn, Rollo, Megan, Ryan, Kate, Harrison, Sandra, Collins, Clare, Wynne, Katie, Brown, Leanne J, Schumacher, Tracy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12722
_version_ 1784751995164295168
author Payne, Ellen
Palmer, Gwendolyn
Rollo, Megan
Ryan, Kate
Harrison, Sandra
Collins, Clare
Wynne, Katie
Brown, Leanne J
Schumacher, Tracy
author_facet Payne, Ellen
Palmer, Gwendolyn
Rollo, Megan
Ryan, Kate
Harrison, Sandra
Collins, Clare
Wynne, Katie
Brown, Leanne J
Schumacher, Tracy
author_sort Payne, Ellen
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding rural healthcare delivery for women with any type of diabetes in pregnancy, and subsequent maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: Eight databases were searched in September 2020, including Medline, EMCare, CINAHL, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, Cochrane, Rural and Remote Health and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health bibliography. Studies from high‐income countries in rural, regional or remote areas with interventions conducted during the antenatal period were included. Intervention details were reported using the template for intervention description and replication template. Two reviewers independently assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 and ROBINS I tools. RESULTS: Three articles met the inclusion criteria: two conducted in Australia and one in the United States. A multidisciplinary approach was reported in two of the included studies, which were modified specifically for their respective rural settings. All three studies reported rates of caesarean section, birthweight (grams) and gestational age at birth as maternal and infant outcomes. One study was considered at moderate risk of bias, and two studies were at serious risk of bias. CONCLUSION: There is a significant gap in research relating to healthcare delivery for women with diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. This lack of research is concerning given that 19% of individuals in high‐income countries reside rurally. Further research is required to understand the implications of healthcare delivery models for diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9303965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93039652022-07-28 Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review Payne, Ellen Palmer, Gwendolyn Rollo, Megan Ryan, Kate Harrison, Sandra Collins, Clare Wynne, Katie Brown, Leanne J Schumacher, Tracy Nutr Diet Reviews AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding rural healthcare delivery for women with any type of diabetes in pregnancy, and subsequent maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: Eight databases were searched in September 2020, including Medline, EMCare, CINAHL, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, Cochrane, Rural and Remote Health and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health bibliography. Studies from high‐income countries in rural, regional or remote areas with interventions conducted during the antenatal period were included. Intervention details were reported using the template for intervention description and replication template. Two reviewers independently assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 and ROBINS I tools. RESULTS: Three articles met the inclusion criteria: two conducted in Australia and one in the United States. A multidisciplinary approach was reported in two of the included studies, which were modified specifically for their respective rural settings. All three studies reported rates of caesarean section, birthweight (grams) and gestational age at birth as maternal and infant outcomes. One study was considered at moderate risk of bias, and two studies were at serious risk of bias. CONCLUSION: There is a significant gap in research relating to healthcare delivery for women with diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. This lack of research is concerning given that 19% of individuals in high‐income countries reside rurally. Further research is required to understand the implications of healthcare delivery models for diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-02-06 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9303965/ /pubmed/35128769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12722 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Nutrition & Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Dietitians Australia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Payne, Ellen
Palmer, Gwendolyn
Rollo, Megan
Ryan, Kate
Harrison, Sandra
Collins, Clare
Wynne, Katie
Brown, Leanne J
Schumacher, Tracy
Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
title Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
title_full Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
title_fullStr Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
title_short Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
title_sort rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12722
work_keys_str_mv AT payneellen ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT palmergwendolyn ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT rollomegan ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT ryankate ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT harrisonsandra ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT collinsclare ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT wynnekatie ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT brownleannej ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview
AT schumachertracy ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview