Cargando…
Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding rural healthcare delivery for women with any type of diabetes in pregnancy, and subsequent maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: Eight databases were searched in September 2020, including Medline, EMCare, CINAHL, EMBASE,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12722 |
_version_ | 1784751995164295168 |
---|---|
author | Payne, Ellen Palmer, Gwendolyn Rollo, Megan Ryan, Kate Harrison, Sandra Collins, Clare Wynne, Katie Brown, Leanne J Schumacher, Tracy |
author_facet | Payne, Ellen Palmer, Gwendolyn Rollo, Megan Ryan, Kate Harrison, Sandra Collins, Clare Wynne, Katie Brown, Leanne J Schumacher, Tracy |
author_sort | Payne, Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding rural healthcare delivery for women with any type of diabetes in pregnancy, and subsequent maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: Eight databases were searched in September 2020, including Medline, EMCare, CINAHL, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, Cochrane, Rural and Remote Health and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health bibliography. Studies from high‐income countries in rural, regional or remote areas with interventions conducted during the antenatal period were included. Intervention details were reported using the template for intervention description and replication template. Two reviewers independently assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 and ROBINS I tools. RESULTS: Three articles met the inclusion criteria: two conducted in Australia and one in the United States. A multidisciplinary approach was reported in two of the included studies, which were modified specifically for their respective rural settings. All three studies reported rates of caesarean section, birthweight (grams) and gestational age at birth as maternal and infant outcomes. One study was considered at moderate risk of bias, and two studies were at serious risk of bias. CONCLUSION: There is a significant gap in research relating to healthcare delivery for women with diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. This lack of research is concerning given that 19% of individuals in high‐income countries reside rurally. Further research is required to understand the implications of healthcare delivery models for diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9303965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93039652022-07-28 Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review Payne, Ellen Palmer, Gwendolyn Rollo, Megan Ryan, Kate Harrison, Sandra Collins, Clare Wynne, Katie Brown, Leanne J Schumacher, Tracy Nutr Diet Reviews AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding rural healthcare delivery for women with any type of diabetes in pregnancy, and subsequent maternal and infant outcomes. METHODS: Eight databases were searched in September 2020, including Medline, EMCare, CINAHL, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, Cochrane, Rural and Remote Health and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health bibliography. Studies from high‐income countries in rural, regional or remote areas with interventions conducted during the antenatal period were included. Intervention details were reported using the template for intervention description and replication template. Two reviewers independently assessed for risk of bias using the RoB2 and ROBINS I tools. RESULTS: Three articles met the inclusion criteria: two conducted in Australia and one in the United States. A multidisciplinary approach was reported in two of the included studies, which were modified specifically for their respective rural settings. All three studies reported rates of caesarean section, birthweight (grams) and gestational age at birth as maternal and infant outcomes. One study was considered at moderate risk of bias, and two studies were at serious risk of bias. CONCLUSION: There is a significant gap in research relating to healthcare delivery for women with diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. This lack of research is concerning given that 19% of individuals in high‐income countries reside rurally. Further research is required to understand the implications of healthcare delivery models for diabetes in pregnancy in rural areas. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-02-06 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9303965/ /pubmed/35128769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12722 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Nutrition & Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Dietitians Australia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Payne, Ellen Palmer, Gwendolyn Rollo, Megan Ryan, Kate Harrison, Sandra Collins, Clare Wynne, Katie Brown, Leanne J Schumacher, Tracy Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review |
title | Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review |
title_full | Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review |
title_short | Rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review |
title_sort | rural healthcare delivery and maternal and infant outcomes for diabetes in pregnancy: a systematic review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT payneellen ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT palmergwendolyn ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT rollomegan ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT ryankate ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT harrisonsandra ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT collinsclare ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT wynnekatie ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT brownleannej ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview AT schumachertracy ruralhealthcaredeliveryandmaternalandinfantoutcomesfordiabetesinpregnancyasystematicreview |