Cargando…
NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
OBJECTIVES: This is a prospective study evaluating NEPA in patients with breast cancer (the NEPA group), who received (neo)adjuvant AC chemotherapy (consisting of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)). The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of NEPA in contro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002037 |
_version_ | 1784752025399984128 |
---|---|
author | Yeo, Winnie Lau, Thomas KH Kwok, Carol CH Lai, Kwai T Chan, Vicky TC Li, Leung Chan, Vivian Wong, Ashley Soo, Winnie MT Yeung, Eva WM Wong, Kam H Tang, Nelson LS Suen, Joyce JS Mo, Frankie KF |
author_facet | Yeo, Winnie Lau, Thomas KH Kwok, Carol CH Lai, Kwai T Chan, Vicky TC Li, Leung Chan, Vivian Wong, Ashley Soo, Winnie MT Yeung, Eva WM Wong, Kam H Tang, Nelson LS Suen, Joyce JS Mo, Frankie KF |
author_sort | Yeo, Winnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This is a prospective study evaluating NEPA in patients with breast cancer (the NEPA group), who received (neo)adjuvant AC chemotherapy (consisting of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)). The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of NEPA in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The secondary objectives were to compare CINV between the NEPA group and historical controls (the APR group) who received aprepitant in an earlier prospective randomised study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 60 patients participated in the NEPA group; 62 were in the APR group. Eligibility criteria of both groups were similar, that is, Chinese patients with breast cancer who were treated with (neo)adjuvant AC. NEPA group received NEPA and dexamethasone; APR group received aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone. Individuals filled in self-reported diary, visual analogue scale for nausea and Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. RESULTS: Within the NEPA group, 70.0%, 85.7% and 60.0%, respectively reported complete response in the acute, delayed and overall phases in cycle 1 AC. When compared with the historical APR group during cycle 1 AC, NEPA group achieved significantly higher rates of complete response, complete protection, total control, ‘no significant nausea’ and ‘no nausea’ in the delayed phase; similar findings were noted in the overall phase with significantly better quality of life. Superior efficacy of NEPA was maintained over multiple cycles. Both antiemetic regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this study on Chinese patients with breast cancer who were uniformly receiving AC, NEPA was effective in controlling CINV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03386617. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9304103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93041032022-08-11 NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin Yeo, Winnie Lau, Thomas KH Kwok, Carol CH Lai, Kwai T Chan, Vicky TC Li, Leung Chan, Vivian Wong, Ashley Soo, Winnie MT Yeung, Eva WM Wong, Kam H Tang, Nelson LS Suen, Joyce JS Mo, Frankie KF BMJ Support Palliat Care Original Research OBJECTIVES: This is a prospective study evaluating NEPA in patients with breast cancer (the NEPA group), who received (neo)adjuvant AC chemotherapy (consisting of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)). The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of NEPA in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The secondary objectives were to compare CINV between the NEPA group and historical controls (the APR group) who received aprepitant in an earlier prospective randomised study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 60 patients participated in the NEPA group; 62 were in the APR group. Eligibility criteria of both groups were similar, that is, Chinese patients with breast cancer who were treated with (neo)adjuvant AC. NEPA group received NEPA and dexamethasone; APR group received aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone. Individuals filled in self-reported diary, visual analogue scale for nausea and Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. RESULTS: Within the NEPA group, 70.0%, 85.7% and 60.0%, respectively reported complete response in the acute, delayed and overall phases in cycle 1 AC. When compared with the historical APR group during cycle 1 AC, NEPA group achieved significantly higher rates of complete response, complete protection, total control, ‘no significant nausea’ and ‘no nausea’ in the delayed phase; similar findings were noted in the overall phase with significantly better quality of life. Superior efficacy of NEPA was maintained over multiple cycles. Both antiemetic regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this study on Chinese patients with breast cancer who were uniformly receiving AC, NEPA was effective in controlling CINV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03386617. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9304103/ /pubmed/31996363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002037 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yeo, Winnie Lau, Thomas KH Kwok, Carol CH Lai, Kwai T Chan, Vicky TC Li, Leung Chan, Vivian Wong, Ashley Soo, Winnie MT Yeung, Eva WM Wong, Kam H Tang, Nelson LS Suen, Joyce JS Mo, Frankie KF NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin |
title | NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin |
title_full | NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin |
title_fullStr | NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin |
title_full_unstemmed | NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin |
title_short | NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin |
title_sort | nepa efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeowinnie nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT lauthomaskh nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT kwokcarolch nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT laikwait nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT chanvickytc nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT lileung nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT chanvivian nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT wongashley nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT soowinniemt nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT yeungevawm nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT wongkamh nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT tangnelsonls nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT suenjoycejs nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin AT mofrankiekf nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin |