Cargando…

NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin

OBJECTIVES: This is a prospective study evaluating NEPA in patients with breast cancer (the NEPA group), who received (neo)adjuvant AC chemotherapy (consisting of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)). The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of NEPA in contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeo, Winnie, Lau, Thomas KH, Kwok, Carol CH, Lai, Kwai T, Chan, Vicky TC, Li, Leung, Chan, Vivian, Wong, Ashley, Soo, Winnie MT, Yeung, Eva WM, Wong, Kam H, Tang, Nelson LS, Suen, Joyce JS, Mo, Frankie KF
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002037
_version_ 1784752025399984128
author Yeo, Winnie
Lau, Thomas KH
Kwok, Carol CH
Lai, Kwai T
Chan, Vicky TC
Li, Leung
Chan, Vivian
Wong, Ashley
Soo, Winnie MT
Yeung, Eva WM
Wong, Kam H
Tang, Nelson LS
Suen, Joyce JS
Mo, Frankie KF
author_facet Yeo, Winnie
Lau, Thomas KH
Kwok, Carol CH
Lai, Kwai T
Chan, Vicky TC
Li, Leung
Chan, Vivian
Wong, Ashley
Soo, Winnie MT
Yeung, Eva WM
Wong, Kam H
Tang, Nelson LS
Suen, Joyce JS
Mo, Frankie KF
author_sort Yeo, Winnie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This is a prospective study evaluating NEPA in patients with breast cancer (the NEPA group), who received (neo)adjuvant AC chemotherapy (consisting of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)). The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of NEPA in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The secondary objectives were to compare CINV between the NEPA group and historical controls (the APR group) who received aprepitant in an earlier prospective randomised study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 60 patients participated in the NEPA group; 62 were in the APR group. Eligibility criteria of both groups were similar, that is, Chinese patients with breast cancer who were treated with (neo)adjuvant AC. NEPA group received NEPA and dexamethasone; APR group received aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone. Individuals filled in self-reported diary, visual analogue scale for nausea and Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. RESULTS: Within the NEPA group, 70.0%, 85.7% and 60.0%, respectively reported complete response in the acute, delayed and overall phases in cycle 1 AC. When compared with the historical APR group during cycle 1 AC, NEPA group achieved significantly higher rates of complete response, complete protection, total control, ‘no significant nausea’ and ‘no nausea’ in the delayed phase; similar findings were noted in the overall phase with significantly better quality of life. Superior efficacy of NEPA was maintained over multiple cycles. Both antiemetic regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this study on Chinese patients with breast cancer who were uniformly receiving AC, NEPA was effective in controlling CINV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03386617.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93041032022-08-11 NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin Yeo, Winnie Lau, Thomas KH Kwok, Carol CH Lai, Kwai T Chan, Vicky TC Li, Leung Chan, Vivian Wong, Ashley Soo, Winnie MT Yeung, Eva WM Wong, Kam H Tang, Nelson LS Suen, Joyce JS Mo, Frankie KF BMJ Support Palliat Care Original Research OBJECTIVES: This is a prospective study evaluating NEPA in patients with breast cancer (the NEPA group), who received (neo)adjuvant AC chemotherapy (consisting of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)). The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of NEPA in controlling chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The secondary objectives were to compare CINV between the NEPA group and historical controls (the APR group) who received aprepitant in an earlier prospective randomised study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 60 patients participated in the NEPA group; 62 were in the APR group. Eligibility criteria of both groups were similar, that is, Chinese patients with breast cancer who were treated with (neo)adjuvant AC. NEPA group received NEPA and dexamethasone; APR group received aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone. Individuals filled in self-reported diary, visual analogue scale for nausea and Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. RESULTS: Within the NEPA group, 70.0%, 85.7% and 60.0%, respectively reported complete response in the acute, delayed and overall phases in cycle 1 AC. When compared with the historical APR group during cycle 1 AC, NEPA group achieved significantly higher rates of complete response, complete protection, total control, ‘no significant nausea’ and ‘no nausea’ in the delayed phase; similar findings were noted in the overall phase with significantly better quality of life. Superior efficacy of NEPA was maintained over multiple cycles. Both antiemetic regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this study on Chinese patients with breast cancer who were uniformly receiving AC, NEPA was effective in controlling CINV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03386617. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9304103/ /pubmed/31996363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002037 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Yeo, Winnie
Lau, Thomas KH
Kwok, Carol CH
Lai, Kwai T
Chan, Vicky TC
Li, Leung
Chan, Vivian
Wong, Ashley
Soo, Winnie MT
Yeung, Eva WM
Wong, Kam H
Tang, Nelson LS
Suen, Joyce JS
Mo, Frankie KF
NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
title NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
title_full NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
title_fullStr NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
title_full_unstemmed NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
title_short NEPA efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
title_sort nepa efficacy and tolerability during (neo)adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002037
work_keys_str_mv AT yeowinnie nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT lauthomaskh nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT kwokcarolch nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT laikwait nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT chanvickytc nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT lileung nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT chanvivian nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT wongashley nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT soowinniemt nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT yeungevawm nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT wongkamh nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT tangnelsonls nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT suenjoycejs nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin
AT mofrankiekf nepaefficacyandtolerabilityduringneoadjuvantbreastcancerchemotherapywithcyclophosphamideanddoxorubicin