Cargando…

Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis

Inbreeding depression, the reduced fitness of the offspring of related individuals, can affect males and females differently. Although a comprehensive theoretical framework describing the causes of sex‐specific inbreeding depression is lacking, empirical evidence suggests that often one sex tends to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vega‐Trejo, Regina, de Boer, Raïssa A., Fitzpatrick, John L., Kotrschal, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13961
_version_ 1784752058011746304
author Vega‐Trejo, Regina
de Boer, Raïssa A.
Fitzpatrick, John L.
Kotrschal, Alexander
author_facet Vega‐Trejo, Regina
de Boer, Raïssa A.
Fitzpatrick, John L.
Kotrschal, Alexander
author_sort Vega‐Trejo, Regina
collection PubMed
description Inbreeding depression, the reduced fitness of the offspring of related individuals, can affect males and females differently. Although a comprehensive theoretical framework describing the causes of sex‐specific inbreeding depression is lacking, empirical evidence suggests that often one sex tends to be more vulnerable than the other. However, the generality, direction, and degree of sex‐specific difference in inbreeding depression remains enigmatic as studies on this topic have reported conflicting results. Here, we conduct a meta‐analysis to test for sex‐specific differences in the magnitude of inbreeding depression. We synthetised 321 effect sizes of experimental studies across 47 species and found a small difference in inbreeding depression between the sexes: females suffered slightly higher inbreeding depression than males. Furthermore, a higher inbreeding coefficient was correlated with higher inbreeding depression. However, there was a large amount of heterogeneity that remained unexplained, even when considering different factors that could affect inbreeding between the sexes, such as sexual size dimorphism, heterogamety, the type of trait measured and whether animals were tested in a stressful environment. As such, we highlight the need to further explore inbreeding depression across different species to determine the occurrence and causes of sex differences to increase our understanding of the evolutionary consequences of sex‐specific inbreeding depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93042382022-07-28 Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis Vega‐Trejo, Regina de Boer, Raïssa A. Fitzpatrick, John L. Kotrschal, Alexander Ecol Lett Synthesis Inbreeding depression, the reduced fitness of the offspring of related individuals, can affect males and females differently. Although a comprehensive theoretical framework describing the causes of sex‐specific inbreeding depression is lacking, empirical evidence suggests that often one sex tends to be more vulnerable than the other. However, the generality, direction, and degree of sex‐specific difference in inbreeding depression remains enigmatic as studies on this topic have reported conflicting results. Here, we conduct a meta‐analysis to test for sex‐specific differences in the magnitude of inbreeding depression. We synthetised 321 effect sizes of experimental studies across 47 species and found a small difference in inbreeding depression between the sexes: females suffered slightly higher inbreeding depression than males. Furthermore, a higher inbreeding coefficient was correlated with higher inbreeding depression. However, there was a large amount of heterogeneity that remained unexplained, even when considering different factors that could affect inbreeding between the sexes, such as sexual size dimorphism, heterogamety, the type of trait measured and whether animals were tested in a stressful environment. As such, we highlight the need to further explore inbreeding depression across different species to determine the occurrence and causes of sex differences to increase our understanding of the evolutionary consequences of sex‐specific inbreeding depression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-21 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9304238/ /pubmed/35064612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13961 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Synthesis
Vega‐Trejo, Regina
de Boer, Raïssa A.
Fitzpatrick, John L.
Kotrschal, Alexander
Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis
title Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis
title_full Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis
title_short Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis
title_sort sex‐specific inbreeding depression: a meta‐analysis
topic Synthesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13961
work_keys_str_mv AT vegatrejoregina sexspecificinbreedingdepressionametaanalysis
AT deboerraissaa sexspecificinbreedingdepressionametaanalysis
AT fitzpatrickjohnl sexspecificinbreedingdepressionametaanalysis
AT kotrschalalexander sexspecificinbreedingdepressionametaanalysis