Cargando…

Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Implicit biases of health professionals could cause biased judgements. Many anti‐bias interventions seem to be ineffective, and some even counterproductive. People tend to be compliant to standards describing what the majority of people finds or does, and this could cause people to thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Andel, Chantal E. E., Born, Marise P., van den Broek, Walter W., Stegers‐Jager, Karen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34894161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14712
_version_ 1784752068435640320
author van Andel, Chantal E. E.
Born, Marise P.
van den Broek, Walter W.
Stegers‐Jager, Karen M.
author_facet van Andel, Chantal E. E.
Born, Marise P.
van den Broek, Walter W.
Stegers‐Jager, Karen M.
author_sort van Andel, Chantal E. E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Implicit biases of health professionals could cause biased judgements. Many anti‐bias interventions seem to be ineffective, and some even counterproductive. People tend to be compliant to standards describing what the majority of people finds or does, and this could cause people to think in a stereotype‐consistent manner. This study examines whether descriptive social norms such as ‘the majority of people have stereotypes’ (majority message), as often stated in interventions, actually increase people's stereotypes. To examine the effect of descriptive social norms (Hypothesis 1) and the effect of individual perceptions and preferences (Hypothesis 2a and 2b) on stereotypical expressions towards medical students. METHODS: First, we determined which ethic stereotypes regarding medical students prevail in Dutch medical education (N = 52). Next, two similar randomised controlled trials, both with teachers and students, were carried out (N = 158 and N = 123, respectively), one with an East Asian student picture (ethnic minority) and one with a native Dutch student picture (ethnic majority). Participants were randomly assigned to either a majority‐message, minority‐message or no‐message condition, and rated the presented minority or majority picture on specific stereotypical features. Subsequently, participants described a typical day of that same student's life. These descriptions were rated for stereotypicality by two independent raters, who were blind for condition and stimulus. Inclusive work environment (IWC) and social dominance orientation (SDO) of participants were measured as indicators of individual perceptions and preferences. RESULTS: Stereotypes were expressed towards both picture stimuli, yet message condition did not affect stereotypical expressions. SDO positively related to stereotypical expressions towards the East Asian student, whereas IWC positively related to stereotypical expressions towards the native Dutch student. CONCLUSION: Interventions do not unintentionally increase stereotypes by communicating what the majority of people thinks or does. Individual perceptions and preferences are predictive of stereotypes, whereas descriptive social norms are not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93042812022-07-28 Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial van Andel, Chantal E. E. Born, Marise P. van den Broek, Walter W. Stegers‐Jager, Karen M. Med Educ Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Implicit biases of health professionals could cause biased judgements. Many anti‐bias interventions seem to be ineffective, and some even counterproductive. People tend to be compliant to standards describing what the majority of people finds or does, and this could cause people to think in a stereotype‐consistent manner. This study examines whether descriptive social norms such as ‘the majority of people have stereotypes’ (majority message), as often stated in interventions, actually increase people's stereotypes. To examine the effect of descriptive social norms (Hypothesis 1) and the effect of individual perceptions and preferences (Hypothesis 2a and 2b) on stereotypical expressions towards medical students. METHODS: First, we determined which ethic stereotypes regarding medical students prevail in Dutch medical education (N = 52). Next, two similar randomised controlled trials, both with teachers and students, were carried out (N = 158 and N = 123, respectively), one with an East Asian student picture (ethnic minority) and one with a native Dutch student picture (ethnic majority). Participants were randomly assigned to either a majority‐message, minority‐message or no‐message condition, and rated the presented minority or majority picture on specific stereotypical features. Subsequently, participants described a typical day of that same student's life. These descriptions were rated for stereotypicality by two independent raters, who were blind for condition and stimulus. Inclusive work environment (IWC) and social dominance orientation (SDO) of participants were measured as indicators of individual perceptions and preferences. RESULTS: Stereotypes were expressed towards both picture stimuli, yet message condition did not affect stereotypical expressions. SDO positively related to stereotypical expressions towards the East Asian student, whereas IWC positively related to stereotypical expressions towards the native Dutch student. CONCLUSION: Interventions do not unintentionally increase stereotypes by communicating what the majority of people thinks or does. Individual perceptions and preferences are predictive of stereotypes, whereas descriptive social norms are not. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-26 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9304281/ /pubmed/34894161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14712 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
van Andel, Chantal E. E.
Born, Marise P.
van den Broek, Walter W.
Stegers‐Jager, Karen M.
Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial
title Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial
title_full Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial
title_short Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial
title_sort do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34894161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14712
work_keys_str_mv AT vanandelchantalee donormsunintentionallyincreasestereotypicalexpressionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bornmarisep donormsunintentionallyincreasestereotypicalexpressionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbroekwalterw donormsunintentionallyincreasestereotypicalexpressionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stegersjagerkarenm donormsunintentionallyincreasestereotypicalexpressionsarandomisedcontrolledtrial