Cargando…

Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking

This study combines metabolic and kinematic measurements at the whole‐body level, with EMG and ultrasound measurements to investigate the influence of muscle‐tendon mechanical behavior on the energy cost (C(net)) of walking (from 2 to 8 km·h(−1)). Belly gearing (Gb = Δmuscle‐belly length/Δfascicles...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monte, Andrea, Tecchio, Paolo, Nardello, Francesca, Bachero‐Mena, Beatriz, Ardigò, Luca Paolo, Zamparo, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35138687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.14142
_version_ 1784752068916936704
author Monte, Andrea
Tecchio, Paolo
Nardello, Francesca
Bachero‐Mena, Beatriz
Ardigò, Luca Paolo
Zamparo, Paola
author_facet Monte, Andrea
Tecchio, Paolo
Nardello, Francesca
Bachero‐Mena, Beatriz
Ardigò, Luca Paolo
Zamparo, Paola
author_sort Monte, Andrea
collection PubMed
description This study combines metabolic and kinematic measurements at the whole‐body level, with EMG and ultrasound measurements to investigate the influence of muscle‐tendon mechanical behavior on the energy cost (C(net)) of walking (from 2 to 8 km·h(−1)). Belly gearing (Gb = Δmuscle‐belly length/Δfascicles length) and tendon gearing (Gt = ∆muscle‐tendon unit length/∆muscle‐belly length) of vastus lateralis (VL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) were calculated based on ultrasound data. Pendular energy recovery (%R) was calculated based on kinematic data, whereas the cumulative activity per distance travelled (CMAPD) was calculated for the VL, GM, tibialis anterior, and biceps femoris as the ratio between their EMG activity and walking speed. Finally, total CAMPD (CMAPD(TOT)) was calculated as the sum of the CMAPD of all the investigate muscles. C(net) and CMAPD(TOT) showed a U‐shaped behavior with a minimum at 4.2 and 4.1 km·h(−1), respectively; while %R, VL, and GM belly gearing showed an opposite trend, reaching a maximum (60% ± 5%, 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.5 ± 0.1, respectively), between 4.7 and 5 km·h(−1). Gt was unaffected by speed in GM (3.5 ± 0.1) and decreased as a function of it in VL. A multiple stepwise linear regression indicated that %R has the greatest influence on C(net,) followed by CMAPD(TOT) and GM belly gearing. The role of Gb on C(net) could be attributed to its role in determining muscle work: when Gb increases, fascicles shortening decreases compared with that of the muscle‐belly, thereby reducing the energy cost of contraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93042832022-07-28 Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking Monte, Andrea Tecchio, Paolo Nardello, Francesca Bachero‐Mena, Beatriz Ardigò, Luca Paolo Zamparo, Paola Scand J Med Sci Sports Original Articles This study combines metabolic and kinematic measurements at the whole‐body level, with EMG and ultrasound measurements to investigate the influence of muscle‐tendon mechanical behavior on the energy cost (C(net)) of walking (from 2 to 8 km·h(−1)). Belly gearing (Gb = Δmuscle‐belly length/Δfascicles length) and tendon gearing (Gt = ∆muscle‐tendon unit length/∆muscle‐belly length) of vastus lateralis (VL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) were calculated based on ultrasound data. Pendular energy recovery (%R) was calculated based on kinematic data, whereas the cumulative activity per distance travelled (CMAPD) was calculated for the VL, GM, tibialis anterior, and biceps femoris as the ratio between their EMG activity and walking speed. Finally, total CAMPD (CMAPD(TOT)) was calculated as the sum of the CMAPD of all the investigate muscles. C(net) and CMAPD(TOT) showed a U‐shaped behavior with a minimum at 4.2 and 4.1 km·h(−1), respectively; while %R, VL, and GM belly gearing showed an opposite trend, reaching a maximum (60% ± 5%, 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.5 ± 0.1, respectively), between 4.7 and 5 km·h(−1). Gt was unaffected by speed in GM (3.5 ± 0.1) and decreased as a function of it in VL. A multiple stepwise linear regression indicated that %R has the greatest influence on C(net,) followed by CMAPD(TOT) and GM belly gearing. The role of Gb on C(net) could be attributed to its role in determining muscle work: when Gb increases, fascicles shortening decreases compared with that of the muscle‐belly, thereby reducing the energy cost of contraction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-14 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9304283/ /pubmed/35138687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.14142 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Monte, Andrea
Tecchio, Paolo
Nardello, Francesca
Bachero‐Mena, Beatriz
Ardigò, Luca Paolo
Zamparo, Paola
Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking
title Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking
title_full Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking
title_fullStr Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking
title_full_unstemmed Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking
title_short Influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking
title_sort influence of muscle‐belly and tendon gearing on the energy cost of human walking
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35138687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sms.14142
work_keys_str_mv AT monteandrea influenceofmusclebellyandtendongearingontheenergycostofhumanwalking
AT tecchiopaolo influenceofmusclebellyandtendongearingontheenergycostofhumanwalking
AT nardellofrancesca influenceofmusclebellyandtendongearingontheenergycostofhumanwalking
AT bacheromenabeatriz influenceofmusclebellyandtendongearingontheenergycostofhumanwalking
AT ardigolucapaolo influenceofmusclebellyandtendongearingontheenergycostofhumanwalking
AT zamparopaola influenceofmusclebellyandtendongearingontheenergycostofhumanwalking