Cargando…

Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) with high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), called “high-PAS”, induces motor-evoked potential (MEP) potentiation in healthy subjects and improves muscle activity and independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients. Data on optimal PNS intensity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pohjonen, Markus, Nyman, Anna-Lena, Kirveskari, Erika, Arokoski, Jari, Shulga, Anastasia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16811-1
_version_ 1784752079751872512
author Pohjonen, Markus
Nyman, Anna-Lena
Kirveskari, Erika
Arokoski, Jari
Shulga, Anastasia
author_facet Pohjonen, Markus
Nyman, Anna-Lena
Kirveskari, Erika
Arokoski, Jari
Shulga, Anastasia
author_sort Pohjonen, Markus
collection PubMed
description Paired associative stimulation (PAS) with high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), called “high-PAS”, induces motor-evoked potential (MEP) potentiation in healthy subjects and improves muscle activity and independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients. Data on optimal PNS intensity in PAS are scarce. In a high-PAS protocol, PNS intensity is defined as “minimal intensity required to produce F-responses”. We sought to further refine this definition and to investigate how PNS intensity affects PAS outcome. Two experiments were performed on 10 healthy subjects where MEP amplitude change was measured 0, 30, and 60 min after PAS. In the first experiment, the intensity required to achieve 7/10 persistence of F-responses was used to define PNS intensity level. In the second experiment, we used the intensity required to achieve 1/10 persistence (“baseline”). In addition, we applied this intensity at + 25%, − 25%, and − 50% levels. In the first experiment, PAS did not produce significant MEP potentiation. In the second experiment, PAS produced statistically significant MEP potentiation, with PNS intensity of “baseline” and “baseline − 25%” levels but not at + 25% or − 50% levels. In conclusion, for PAS utilizing high-frequency PNS, the intensity required to achieve 1/10 F-response persistence or the intensity 25% lower produces significant MEP potentiation in healthy subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93043302022-07-23 Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects Pohjonen, Markus Nyman, Anna-Lena Kirveskari, Erika Arokoski, Jari Shulga, Anastasia Sci Rep Article Paired associative stimulation (PAS) with high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), called “high-PAS”, induces motor-evoked potential (MEP) potentiation in healthy subjects and improves muscle activity and independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients. Data on optimal PNS intensity in PAS are scarce. In a high-PAS protocol, PNS intensity is defined as “minimal intensity required to produce F-responses”. We sought to further refine this definition and to investigate how PNS intensity affects PAS outcome. Two experiments were performed on 10 healthy subjects where MEP amplitude change was measured 0, 30, and 60 min after PAS. In the first experiment, the intensity required to achieve 7/10 persistence of F-responses was used to define PNS intensity level. In the second experiment, we used the intensity required to achieve 1/10 persistence (“baseline”). In addition, we applied this intensity at + 25%, − 25%, and − 50% levels. In the first experiment, PAS did not produce significant MEP potentiation. In the second experiment, PAS produced statistically significant MEP potentiation, with PNS intensity of “baseline” and “baseline − 25%” levels but not at + 25% or − 50% levels. In conclusion, for PAS utilizing high-frequency PNS, the intensity required to achieve 1/10 F-response persistence or the intensity 25% lower produces significant MEP potentiation in healthy subjects. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9304330/ /pubmed/35864177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16811-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Pohjonen, Markus
Nyman, Anna-Lena
Kirveskari, Erika
Arokoski, Jari
Shulga, Anastasia
Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
title Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
title_full Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
title_fullStr Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
title_full_unstemmed Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
title_short Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
title_sort optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16811-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pohjonenmarkus optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects
AT nymanannalena optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects
AT kirveskarierika optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects
AT arokoskijari optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects
AT shulgaanastasia optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects