Cargando…
Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects
Paired associative stimulation (PAS) with high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), called “high-PAS”, induces motor-evoked potential (MEP) potentiation in healthy subjects and improves muscle activity and independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients. Data on optimal PNS intensity...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16811-1 |
_version_ | 1784752079751872512 |
---|---|
author | Pohjonen, Markus Nyman, Anna-Lena Kirveskari, Erika Arokoski, Jari Shulga, Anastasia |
author_facet | Pohjonen, Markus Nyman, Anna-Lena Kirveskari, Erika Arokoski, Jari Shulga, Anastasia |
author_sort | Pohjonen, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Paired associative stimulation (PAS) with high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), called “high-PAS”, induces motor-evoked potential (MEP) potentiation in healthy subjects and improves muscle activity and independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients. Data on optimal PNS intensity in PAS are scarce. In a high-PAS protocol, PNS intensity is defined as “minimal intensity required to produce F-responses”. We sought to further refine this definition and to investigate how PNS intensity affects PAS outcome. Two experiments were performed on 10 healthy subjects where MEP amplitude change was measured 0, 30, and 60 min after PAS. In the first experiment, the intensity required to achieve 7/10 persistence of F-responses was used to define PNS intensity level. In the second experiment, we used the intensity required to achieve 1/10 persistence (“baseline”). In addition, we applied this intensity at + 25%, − 25%, and − 50% levels. In the first experiment, PAS did not produce significant MEP potentiation. In the second experiment, PAS produced statistically significant MEP potentiation, with PNS intensity of “baseline” and “baseline − 25%” levels but not at + 25% or − 50% levels. In conclusion, for PAS utilizing high-frequency PNS, the intensity required to achieve 1/10 F-response persistence or the intensity 25% lower produces significant MEP potentiation in healthy subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9304330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93043302022-07-23 Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects Pohjonen, Markus Nyman, Anna-Lena Kirveskari, Erika Arokoski, Jari Shulga, Anastasia Sci Rep Article Paired associative stimulation (PAS) with high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), called “high-PAS”, induces motor-evoked potential (MEP) potentiation in healthy subjects and improves muscle activity and independence in incomplete spinal cord injury patients. Data on optimal PNS intensity in PAS are scarce. In a high-PAS protocol, PNS intensity is defined as “minimal intensity required to produce F-responses”. We sought to further refine this definition and to investigate how PNS intensity affects PAS outcome. Two experiments were performed on 10 healthy subjects where MEP amplitude change was measured 0, 30, and 60 min after PAS. In the first experiment, the intensity required to achieve 7/10 persistence of F-responses was used to define PNS intensity level. In the second experiment, we used the intensity required to achieve 1/10 persistence (“baseline”). In addition, we applied this intensity at + 25%, − 25%, and − 50% levels. In the first experiment, PAS did not produce significant MEP potentiation. In the second experiment, PAS produced statistically significant MEP potentiation, with PNS intensity of “baseline” and “baseline − 25%” levels but not at + 25% or − 50% levels. In conclusion, for PAS utilizing high-frequency PNS, the intensity required to achieve 1/10 F-response persistence or the intensity 25% lower produces significant MEP potentiation in healthy subjects. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9304330/ /pubmed/35864177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16811-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Pohjonen, Markus Nyman, Anna-Lena Kirveskari, Erika Arokoski, Jari Shulga, Anastasia Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects |
title | Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects |
title_full | Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects |
title_fullStr | Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects |
title_short | Optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects |
title_sort | optimal peripheral nerve stimulation intensity for paired associative stimulation with high-frequency peripheral component in healthy subjects |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16811-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pohjonenmarkus optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects AT nymanannalena optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects AT kirveskarierika optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects AT arokoskijari optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects AT shulgaanastasia optimalperipheralnervestimulationintensityforpairedassociativestimulationwithhighfrequencyperipheralcomponentinhealthysubjects |