Cargando…

Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure obtained using the ClearSight system by comparing it with invasive arterial blood pressure, and to assess the hemodynamic changes using invasive methods and the ClearSight system in patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Misugi, Takuya, Juri, Takashi, Suehiro, Koichi, Kitada, Kohei, Kurihara, Yasushi, Tahara, Mie, Hamuro, Akihiro, Nakano, Akemi, Koyama, Masayasu, Mori, Takasi, Tachibana, Daisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754365
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22063
_version_ 1784752103478001664
author Misugi, Takuya
Juri, Takashi
Suehiro, Koichi
Kitada, Kohei
Kurihara, Yasushi
Tahara, Mie
Hamuro, Akihiro
Nakano, Akemi
Koyama, Masayasu
Mori, Takasi
Tachibana, Daisuke
author_facet Misugi, Takuya
Juri, Takashi
Suehiro, Koichi
Kitada, Kohei
Kurihara, Yasushi
Tahara, Mie
Hamuro, Akihiro
Nakano, Akemi
Koyama, Masayasu
Mori, Takasi
Tachibana, Daisuke
author_sort Misugi, Takuya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure obtained using the ClearSight system by comparing it with invasive arterial blood pressure, and to assess the hemodynamic changes using invasive methods and the ClearSight system in patients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: Arterial pressure was measured invasively with an intra-arterial catheter and non-invasively using the ClearSight system during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa or placenta accreta. Blood pressure measurements obtained using these two means were then compared. RESULTS: Total 1,277 blood pressure measurement pairs were collected from 21 patients. Under Bland-Altman analysis, the ClearSight system demonstrated an acceptable accuracy with a bias and standard deviation of 8.8±13.4 mmHg for systolic blood pressure, −6.3±7.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and −2.7±8.0 mmHg for median blood pressure. Cardiac index levels were significantly elevated during fetal delivery and 5 minutes after placental removal, and systemic vascular resistance index levels were significantly decreased during fetal delivery and 40 minutes after placental removal. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing cesarean section, the ClearSight system showed excellent accuracy and precision compared to that of the currently used invasive monitoring system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93044362022-08-01 Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section Misugi, Takuya Juri, Takashi Suehiro, Koichi Kitada, Kohei Kurihara, Yasushi Tahara, Mie Hamuro, Akihiro Nakano, Akemi Koyama, Masayasu Mori, Takasi Tachibana, Daisuke Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure obtained using the ClearSight system by comparing it with invasive arterial blood pressure, and to assess the hemodynamic changes using invasive methods and the ClearSight system in patients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: Arterial pressure was measured invasively with an intra-arterial catheter and non-invasively using the ClearSight system during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa or placenta accreta. Blood pressure measurements obtained using these two means were then compared. RESULTS: Total 1,277 blood pressure measurement pairs were collected from 21 patients. Under Bland-Altman analysis, the ClearSight system demonstrated an acceptable accuracy with a bias and standard deviation of 8.8±13.4 mmHg for systolic blood pressure, −6.3±7.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and −2.7±8.0 mmHg for median blood pressure. Cardiac index levels were significantly elevated during fetal delivery and 5 minutes after placental removal, and systemic vascular resistance index levels were significantly decreased during fetal delivery and 40 minutes after placental removal. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing cesarean section, the ClearSight system showed excellent accuracy and precision compared to that of the currently used invasive monitoring system. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2022-07 2022-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9304436/ /pubmed/35754365 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22063 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Misugi, Takuya
Juri, Takashi
Suehiro, Koichi
Kitada, Kohei
Kurihara, Yasushi
Tahara, Mie
Hamuro, Akihiro
Nakano, Akemi
Koyama, Masayasu
Mori, Takasi
Tachibana, Daisuke
Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section
title Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section
title_full Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section
title_fullStr Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section
title_short Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section
title_sort non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the clearsight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35754365
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22063
work_keys_str_mv AT misugitakuya noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT juritakashi noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT suehirokoichi noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT kitadakohei noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT kuriharayasushi noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT taharamie noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT hamuroakihiro noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT nakanoakemi noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT koyamamasayasu noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT moritakasi noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection
AT tachibanadaisuke noninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremonitoringusingtheclearsightsystemforpregnantwomenathighrisksofpostpartumhemorrhagecomparisonwithinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcesareansection