Cargando…

Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies

BACKGROUND: Current German and European guidelines suggest migraine patients undertake a treatment break after 9 to 12 months of treatment with CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Clinical routine data of highly resistant migraine patients were analyzed before treatment with CGRP monoclon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nsaka, Michael, Scheffler, Armin, Wurthmann, Sebastian, Schenk, Hannah, Kleinschnitz, Christoph, Glas, Martin, Holle, Dagny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35687795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2662
_version_ 1784752178781487104
author Nsaka, Michael
Scheffler, Armin
Wurthmann, Sebastian
Schenk, Hannah
Kleinschnitz, Christoph
Glas, Martin
Holle, Dagny
author_facet Nsaka, Michael
Scheffler, Armin
Wurthmann, Sebastian
Schenk, Hannah
Kleinschnitz, Christoph
Glas, Martin
Holle, Dagny
author_sort Nsaka, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current German and European guidelines suggest migraine patients undertake a treatment break after 9 to 12 months of treatment with CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Clinical routine data of highly resistant migraine patients were analyzed before treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibodies (baseline), after 12 months of treatment, and following a treatment break between November 2018 and December 2020 in the West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, Germany. Monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), and days of acute medication intake (AMD) were assessed. RESULTS: Complete clinical data from 46 migraine patients (14 episodic migraine (EM), 32 chronic migraine (CM) patients) treated with erenumab (n = 40), galcanezumab (n = 4), and fremanezumab (n = 2) were analyzed. The mean number of MMDs among EM and CM patients after 12 months of CGRP antibody treatment increased during the treatment break by 5.18 (SE 0.92, p < .001) and 5.06 (SE 1.22, p = .003) days, respectively. There was an increased intake of acute medications among episodic (4.72, SE 0.87, p = .004) and chronic migraine patients (3.01, SE 1.08, p = .013) during treatment break. Eighty‐three percent of patients (n = 38) were dissatisfied with the mandatory treatment break. All patients continued with a CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody after the mandatory treatment break. CONCLUSION: A mandatory break in CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody therapy had a negative short‐term impact on migraine patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93048302022-07-26 Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies Nsaka, Michael Scheffler, Armin Wurthmann, Sebastian Schenk, Hannah Kleinschnitz, Christoph Glas, Martin Holle, Dagny Brain Behav Original Articles BACKGROUND: Current German and European guidelines suggest migraine patients undertake a treatment break after 9 to 12 months of treatment with CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Clinical routine data of highly resistant migraine patients were analyzed before treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibodies (baseline), after 12 months of treatment, and following a treatment break between November 2018 and December 2020 in the West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, Germany. Monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), and days of acute medication intake (AMD) were assessed. RESULTS: Complete clinical data from 46 migraine patients (14 episodic migraine (EM), 32 chronic migraine (CM) patients) treated with erenumab (n = 40), galcanezumab (n = 4), and fremanezumab (n = 2) were analyzed. The mean number of MMDs among EM and CM patients after 12 months of CGRP antibody treatment increased during the treatment break by 5.18 (SE 0.92, p < .001) and 5.06 (SE 1.22, p = .003) days, respectively. There was an increased intake of acute medications among episodic (4.72, SE 0.87, p = .004) and chronic migraine patients (3.01, SE 1.08, p = .013) during treatment break. Eighty‐three percent of patients (n = 38) were dissatisfied with the mandatory treatment break. All patients continued with a CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody after the mandatory treatment break. CONCLUSION: A mandatory break in CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody therapy had a negative short‐term impact on migraine patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9304830/ /pubmed/35687795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2662 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nsaka, Michael
Scheffler, Armin
Wurthmann, Sebastian
Schenk, Hannah
Kleinschnitz, Christoph
Glas, Martin
Holle, Dagny
Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
title Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
title_full Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
title_fullStr Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
title_full_unstemmed Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
title_short Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
title_sort real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35687795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2662
work_keys_str_mv AT nsakamichael realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies
AT schefflerarmin realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies
AT wurthmannsebastian realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies
AT schenkhannah realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies
AT kleinschnitzchristoph realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies
AT glasmartin realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies
AT holledagny realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies