Cargando…
Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies
BACKGROUND: Current German and European guidelines suggest migraine patients undertake a treatment break after 9 to 12 months of treatment with CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Clinical routine data of highly resistant migraine patients were analyzed before treatment with CGRP monoclon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35687795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2662 |
_version_ | 1784752178781487104 |
---|---|
author | Nsaka, Michael Scheffler, Armin Wurthmann, Sebastian Schenk, Hannah Kleinschnitz, Christoph Glas, Martin Holle, Dagny |
author_facet | Nsaka, Michael Scheffler, Armin Wurthmann, Sebastian Schenk, Hannah Kleinschnitz, Christoph Glas, Martin Holle, Dagny |
author_sort | Nsaka, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current German and European guidelines suggest migraine patients undertake a treatment break after 9 to 12 months of treatment with CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Clinical routine data of highly resistant migraine patients were analyzed before treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibodies (baseline), after 12 months of treatment, and following a treatment break between November 2018 and December 2020 in the West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, Germany. Monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), and days of acute medication intake (AMD) were assessed. RESULTS: Complete clinical data from 46 migraine patients (14 episodic migraine (EM), 32 chronic migraine (CM) patients) treated with erenumab (n = 40), galcanezumab (n = 4), and fremanezumab (n = 2) were analyzed. The mean number of MMDs among EM and CM patients after 12 months of CGRP antibody treatment increased during the treatment break by 5.18 (SE 0.92, p < .001) and 5.06 (SE 1.22, p = .003) days, respectively. There was an increased intake of acute medications among episodic (4.72, SE 0.87, p = .004) and chronic migraine patients (3.01, SE 1.08, p = .013) during treatment break. Eighty‐three percent of patients (n = 38) were dissatisfied with the mandatory treatment break. All patients continued with a CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody after the mandatory treatment break. CONCLUSION: A mandatory break in CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody therapy had a negative short‐term impact on migraine patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9304830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93048302022-07-26 Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies Nsaka, Michael Scheffler, Armin Wurthmann, Sebastian Schenk, Hannah Kleinschnitz, Christoph Glas, Martin Holle, Dagny Brain Behav Original Articles BACKGROUND: Current German and European guidelines suggest migraine patients undertake a treatment break after 9 to 12 months of treatment with CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibodies. METHODS: Clinical routine data of highly resistant migraine patients were analyzed before treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibodies (baseline), after 12 months of treatment, and following a treatment break between November 2018 and December 2020 in the West German Headache Centre, University Hospital Essen, Germany. Monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), and days of acute medication intake (AMD) were assessed. RESULTS: Complete clinical data from 46 migraine patients (14 episodic migraine (EM), 32 chronic migraine (CM) patients) treated with erenumab (n = 40), galcanezumab (n = 4), and fremanezumab (n = 2) were analyzed. The mean number of MMDs among EM and CM patients after 12 months of CGRP antibody treatment increased during the treatment break by 5.18 (SE 0.92, p < .001) and 5.06 (SE 1.22, p = .003) days, respectively. There was an increased intake of acute medications among episodic (4.72, SE 0.87, p = .004) and chronic migraine patients (3.01, SE 1.08, p = .013) during treatment break. Eighty‐three percent of patients (n = 38) were dissatisfied with the mandatory treatment break. All patients continued with a CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody after the mandatory treatment break. CONCLUSION: A mandatory break in CGRP (pathway) monoclonal antibody therapy had a negative short‐term impact on migraine patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9304830/ /pubmed/35687795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2662 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Nsaka, Michael Scheffler, Armin Wurthmann, Sebastian Schenk, Hannah Kleinschnitz, Christoph Glas, Martin Holle, Dagny Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies |
title | Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies |
title_full | Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies |
title_fullStr | Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies |
title_full_unstemmed | Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies |
title_short | Real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies |
title_sort | real‐world evidence following a mandatory treatment break after a 1‐year prophylactic treatment with calcitonin gene‐related peptide (pathway) monoclonal antibodies |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35687795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2662 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nsakamichael realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies AT schefflerarmin realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies AT wurthmannsebastian realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies AT schenkhannah realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies AT kleinschnitzchristoph realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies AT glasmartin realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies AT holledagny realworldevidencefollowingamandatorytreatmentbreakaftera1yearprophylactictreatmentwithcalcitoningenerelatedpeptidepathwaymonoclonalantibodies |