Cargando…

Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is heterogeneous and aggressive, especially with liver metastasis. This study aims to develop two nomograms to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM) patients. METHODS: From January 2000 to Decemb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Zhongyi, Zhang, Yeqian, Geng, Haigang, Ni, Bo, Xia, Xiang, Zhu, Chunchao, Liu, Jiahua, Zhang, Zizhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35868142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101480
_version_ 1784752190461575168
author Dong, Zhongyi
Zhang, Yeqian
Geng, Haigang
Ni, Bo
Xia, Xiang
Zhu, Chunchao
Liu, Jiahua
Zhang, Zizhen
author_facet Dong, Zhongyi
Zhang, Yeqian
Geng, Haigang
Ni, Bo
Xia, Xiang
Zhu, Chunchao
Liu, Jiahua
Zhang, Zizhen
author_sort Dong, Zhongyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is heterogeneous and aggressive, especially with liver metastasis. This study aims to develop two nomograms to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM) patients. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2018, a total of 1936 GCLM patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. They were further divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort, with the OS and CSS serving as the study's endpoints. The correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between the variables. The univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to confirm the independent prognostic factors. To discriminate and calibrate the nomogram, calibration curves and the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time-dependent AUC) were used. DCA curves were used to examine the accuracy and clinical benefits. The clinical utility of the nomogram and the AJCC Stage System was compared using net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated differentiation improvement (IDI) (IDI). Finally, the nomogram and the AJCC Stage System risk stratifications were compared. RESULTS: There was no collinearity among the variables that were screened. The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that six variables (bone metastasis, lung metastasis, surgery, chemotherapy, grade, age) and five variables (lung metastasis, surgery, chemotherapy, grade, N stage) were identified to establish the nomogram for OS and CSS, respectively. The calibration curves, time-dependent AUC curves, and DCA revealed that both nomograms had pleasant predictive power. Furthermore, NRI and IDI confirmed that the nomogram outperformed the AJCC Stage System. CONCLUSION: Both nomograms had satisfactory accuracy and were validated to assist clinicians in evaluating the prognosis of GCLM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9304879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93048792022-07-25 Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database Dong, Zhongyi Zhang, Yeqian Geng, Haigang Ni, Bo Xia, Xiang Zhu, Chunchao Liu, Jiahua Zhang, Zizhen Transl Oncol Original Research BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is heterogeneous and aggressive, especially with liver metastasis. This study aims to develop two nomograms to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM) patients. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2018, a total of 1936 GCLM patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. They were further divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort, with the OS and CSS serving as the study's endpoints. The correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between the variables. The univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to confirm the independent prognostic factors. To discriminate and calibrate the nomogram, calibration curves and the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time-dependent AUC) were used. DCA curves were used to examine the accuracy and clinical benefits. The clinical utility of the nomogram and the AJCC Stage System was compared using net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated differentiation improvement (IDI) (IDI). Finally, the nomogram and the AJCC Stage System risk stratifications were compared. RESULTS: There was no collinearity among the variables that were screened. The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that six variables (bone metastasis, lung metastasis, surgery, chemotherapy, grade, age) and five variables (lung metastasis, surgery, chemotherapy, grade, N stage) were identified to establish the nomogram for OS and CSS, respectively. The calibration curves, time-dependent AUC curves, and DCA revealed that both nomograms had pleasant predictive power. Furthermore, NRI and IDI confirmed that the nomogram outperformed the AJCC Stage System. CONCLUSION: Both nomograms had satisfactory accuracy and were validated to assist clinicians in evaluating the prognosis of GCLM patients. Neoplasia Press 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9304879/ /pubmed/35868142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101480 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Dong, Zhongyi
Zhang, Yeqian
Geng, Haigang
Ni, Bo
Xia, Xiang
Zhu, Chunchao
Liu, Jiahua
Zhang, Zizhen
Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database
title Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database
title_full Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database
title_fullStr Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database
title_short Development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective cohort study from SEER database
title_sort development and validation of two nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study from seer database
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9304879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35868142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101480
work_keys_str_mv AT dongzhongyi developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase
AT zhangyeqian developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase
AT genghaigang developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase
AT nibo developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase
AT xiaxiang developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase
AT zhuchunchao developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase
AT liujiahua developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase
AT zhangzizhen developmentandvalidationoftwonomogramsforpredictingoverallsurvivalandcancerspecificsurvivalingastriccancerpatientswithlivermetastasesaretrospectivecohortstudyfromseerdatabase