Cargando…

Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss

We compare the focal structure–function correlation of structural measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL‐T) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), capillary density (CD) measurements using OCT‐angiography (OCT‐A), or a combination of both, with visual field deviat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kallab, Martin, Hommer, Nikolaus, Schlatter, Andreas, Chua, Jacqueline, Tan, Bingyao, Schmidl, Doreen, Hirn, Cornelia, Findl, Oliver, Schmetterer, Leopold, Garhöfer, Gerhard, Wong, Damon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14732
_version_ 1784752240834117632
author Kallab, Martin
Hommer, Nikolaus
Schlatter, Andreas
Chua, Jacqueline
Tan, Bingyao
Schmidl, Doreen
Hirn, Cornelia
Findl, Oliver
Schmetterer, Leopold
Garhöfer, Gerhard
Wong, Damon
author_facet Kallab, Martin
Hommer, Nikolaus
Schlatter, Andreas
Chua, Jacqueline
Tan, Bingyao
Schmidl, Doreen
Hirn, Cornelia
Findl, Oliver
Schmetterer, Leopold
Garhöfer, Gerhard
Wong, Damon
author_sort Kallab, Martin
collection PubMed
description We compare the focal structure–function correlation of structural measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL‐T) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), capillary density (CD) measurements using OCT‐angiography (OCT‐A), or a combination of both, with visual field deviation (VFD) in early to advanced glaucoma. Primary open angle glaucoma patients (n = 46, mean ± SD age: 67 ± 10 years; VF mean deviation: −10.41 ± 6.76 dB) were included in this cross‐sectional study. We performed 30–2 standard automated perimetry OCT (3.5‐mm diameter ring scan) and 15°×15° OCT‐A (superficial vascular complex slab). Based on a nerve fiber trajectory model, each VF test spot was assigned to an OCT‐A wedge and an OCT ring‐sector. Two univariate linear models (M(v) and M(t) ) using either CD‐based vascular (M(v) ) or RNFL‐T–based thickness information (M(t) ) and one multivariate model using both (M(v:t) ) were compared in their associations with measured focal VFD, which were higher for the multivariate model M(v:t) (mean ± SD correlation coefficient: 0.710 ± 0.086) than for either nested model (0.627 ± 0.078 for M(v) and 0.578 ± 0.095 for M(t) ). Using a focal visual field approach, the combination of RNFL‐T and CD showed better structure–function correlations than thickness or vascular information only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93050982022-07-28 Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss Kallab, Martin Hommer, Nikolaus Schlatter, Andreas Chua, Jacqueline Tan, Bingyao Schmidl, Doreen Hirn, Cornelia Findl, Oliver Schmetterer, Leopold Garhöfer, Gerhard Wong, Damon Ann N Y Acad Sci Original Articles We compare the focal structure–function correlation of structural measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL‐T) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), capillary density (CD) measurements using OCT‐angiography (OCT‐A), or a combination of both, with visual field deviation (VFD) in early to advanced glaucoma. Primary open angle glaucoma patients (n = 46, mean ± SD age: 67 ± 10 years; VF mean deviation: −10.41 ± 6.76 dB) were included in this cross‐sectional study. We performed 30–2 standard automated perimetry OCT (3.5‐mm diameter ring scan) and 15°×15° OCT‐A (superficial vascular complex slab). Based on a nerve fiber trajectory model, each VF test spot was assigned to an OCT‐A wedge and an OCT ring‐sector. Two univariate linear models (M(v) and M(t) ) using either CD‐based vascular (M(v) ) or RNFL‐T–based thickness information (M(t) ) and one multivariate model using both (M(v:t) ) were compared in their associations with measured focal VFD, which were higher for the multivariate model M(v:t) (mean ± SD correlation coefficient: 0.710 ± 0.086) than for either nested model (0.627 ± 0.078 for M(v) and 0.578 ± 0.095 for M(t) ). Using a focal visual field approach, the combination of RNFL‐T and CD showed better structure–function correlations than thickness or vascular information only. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-14 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9305098/ /pubmed/35029314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14732 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of New York Academy of Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kallab, Martin
Hommer, Nikolaus
Schlatter, Andreas
Chua, Jacqueline
Tan, Bingyao
Schmidl, Doreen
Hirn, Cornelia
Findl, Oliver
Schmetterer, Leopold
Garhöfer, Gerhard
Wong, Damon
Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss
title Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss
title_full Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss
title_fullStr Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss
title_full_unstemmed Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss
title_short Combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss
title_sort combining vascular and nerve fiber layer thickness measurements to model glaucomatous focal visual field loss
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35029314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14732
work_keys_str_mv AT kallabmartin combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT hommernikolaus combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT schlatterandreas combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT chuajacqueline combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT tanbingyao combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT schmidldoreen combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT hirncornelia combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT findloliver combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT schmettererleopold combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT garhofergerhard combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss
AT wongdamon combiningvascularandnervefiberlayerthicknessmeasurementstomodelglaucomatousfocalvisualfieldloss