Cargando…

Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system

BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical swallowing evaluation provides quantitative physiological and morphological data. As a low‐risk procedure, ultrasound imaging can be performed outside of a medical setting. This is particularly important for patients living in rural areas w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winiker, Katharina, Hammond, Rebecca, Thomas, Paige, Dimmock, Alice, Huckabee, Maggie‐Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35112768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12703
_version_ 1784752249686196224
author Winiker, Katharina
Hammond, Rebecca
Thomas, Paige
Dimmock, Alice
Huckabee, Maggie‐Lee
author_facet Winiker, Katharina
Hammond, Rebecca
Thomas, Paige
Dimmock, Alice
Huckabee, Maggie‐Lee
author_sort Winiker, Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical swallowing evaluation provides quantitative physiological and morphological data. As a low‐risk procedure, ultrasound imaging can be performed outside of a medical setting. This is particularly important for patients living in rural areas with restricted access to a hospital. Technical advances have produced pocket‐sized ultrasound technology that is more affordable, and therefore within the fiscal reach of most allied health services. AIMS: To explore the validity and reliability of pocket‐sized ultrasound technology in dysphagia assessment. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Data were acquired from 43 patients with dysphagia using the Clarius ultrasound device. Ultrasound and videofluoroscopic measures of hyoid and laryngeal displacement during liquid and puree swallowing were collected concurrently to quantify correlation and agreement between identical measures derived from the two instruments. Reliability of ultrasound was assessed for measures of hyoid and laryngeal displacement, tongue thickness, and size of the submental muscles in eight patients. Reliability was evaluated for the entire process of data acquisition including scanning and online measurement using an iPad in a clinical setting and for offline measurement on a computer screen to explore environmental influences on reliability. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Results revealed poor correlation between the measures of interest across instruments. Reliability of the entire process of data acquisition in a clinical setting was insufficient while reliability was more promising for offline measurements. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The clinical use of pocket‐sized ultrasound devices, such as the Clarius system, for swallowing evaluation is not indicated at this time. Enhanced validity and reliability of the entire process of data acquisition are needed prior to clinical translation of such technology. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT: The use of ultrasound allows for radiation‐free, non‐invasive swallowing assessment. Some data suggest that ultrasound is valid and reliable in the evaluation of swallowing using standard‐sized equipment. Insufficient validity and reliability have been reported for pocket‐sized ultrasound technology in the assessment of healthy swallowing. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE: This research is the first to provide validity and reliability data of the pocket‐sized Clarius technology in the evaluation of swallowing in patients with dysphagia. Insufficient validity and reliability of online data acquisition in a clinical environment were found. Reliability for offline measurement was more promising. WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL OR ACTUAL CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WORK? The clinical use of pocket‐sized ultrasound devices, such as the Clarius system, for swallowing assessment is not indicated at this time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93051302022-07-28 Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system Winiker, Katharina Hammond, Rebecca Thomas, Paige Dimmock, Alice Huckabee, Maggie‐Lee Int J Lang Commun Disord Research Reports BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound as an adjunct to clinical swallowing evaluation provides quantitative physiological and morphological data. As a low‐risk procedure, ultrasound imaging can be performed outside of a medical setting. This is particularly important for patients living in rural areas with restricted access to a hospital. Technical advances have produced pocket‐sized ultrasound technology that is more affordable, and therefore within the fiscal reach of most allied health services. AIMS: To explore the validity and reliability of pocket‐sized ultrasound technology in dysphagia assessment. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Data were acquired from 43 patients with dysphagia using the Clarius ultrasound device. Ultrasound and videofluoroscopic measures of hyoid and laryngeal displacement during liquid and puree swallowing were collected concurrently to quantify correlation and agreement between identical measures derived from the two instruments. Reliability of ultrasound was assessed for measures of hyoid and laryngeal displacement, tongue thickness, and size of the submental muscles in eight patients. Reliability was evaluated for the entire process of data acquisition including scanning and online measurement using an iPad in a clinical setting and for offline measurement on a computer screen to explore environmental influences on reliability. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Results revealed poor correlation between the measures of interest across instruments. Reliability of the entire process of data acquisition in a clinical setting was insufficient while reliability was more promising for offline measurements. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The clinical use of pocket‐sized ultrasound devices, such as the Clarius system, for swallowing evaluation is not indicated at this time. Enhanced validity and reliability of the entire process of data acquisition are needed prior to clinical translation of such technology. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT: The use of ultrasound allows for radiation‐free, non‐invasive swallowing assessment. Some data suggest that ultrasound is valid and reliable in the evaluation of swallowing using standard‐sized equipment. Insufficient validity and reliability have been reported for pocket‐sized ultrasound technology in the assessment of healthy swallowing. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE: This research is the first to provide validity and reliability data of the pocket‐sized Clarius technology in the evaluation of swallowing in patients with dysphagia. Insufficient validity and reliability of online data acquisition in a clinical environment were found. Reliability for offline measurement was more promising. WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL OR ACTUAL CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WORK? The clinical use of pocket‐sized ultrasound devices, such as the Clarius system, for swallowing assessment is not indicated at this time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9305130/ /pubmed/35112768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12703 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Winiker, Katharina
Hammond, Rebecca
Thomas, Paige
Dimmock, Alice
Huckabee, Maggie‐Lee
Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system
title Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system
title_full Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system
title_fullStr Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system
title_full_unstemmed Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system
title_short Swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: Validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system
title_sort swallowing assessment in patients with dysphagia: validity and reliability of a pocket‐sized ultrasound system
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35112768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12703
work_keys_str_mv AT winikerkatharina swallowingassessmentinpatientswithdysphagiavalidityandreliabilityofapocketsizedultrasoundsystem
AT hammondrebecca swallowingassessmentinpatientswithdysphagiavalidityandreliabilityofapocketsizedultrasoundsystem
AT thomaspaige swallowingassessmentinpatientswithdysphagiavalidityandreliabilityofapocketsizedultrasoundsystem
AT dimmockalice swallowingassessmentinpatientswithdysphagiavalidityandreliabilityofapocketsizedultrasoundsystem
AT huckabeemaggielee swallowingassessmentinpatientswithdysphagiavalidityandreliabilityofapocketsizedultrasoundsystem