Cargando…

Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV

OBJECTIVES: Despite successful treatment, people living with HIV experience persisting and burdensome multidimensional problems. We aimed to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of Positive Outcomes, a patient‐reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 139...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding, Richard, Jones, Christopher Iain, Bremner, Stephen, Bristowe, Katherine, West, Brian, Siegert, Richard J., O’Brien, Kelly K., Whetham, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13224
_version_ 1784752253022765056
author Harding, Richard
Jones, Christopher Iain
Bremner, Stephen
Bristowe, Katherine
West, Brian
Siegert, Richard J.
O’Brien, Kelly K.
Whetham, Jennifer
author_facet Harding, Richard
Jones, Christopher Iain
Bremner, Stephen
Bristowe, Katherine
West, Brian
Siegert, Richard J.
O’Brien, Kelly K.
Whetham, Jennifer
author_sort Harding, Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Despite successful treatment, people living with HIV experience persisting and burdensome multidimensional problems. We aimed to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of Positive Outcomes, a patient‐reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 1392 outpatients in five European countries self‐completed Positive Outcomes, PAM‐13 (patient empowerment), PROQOL‐HIV (quality of life) and FRAIL (frailty) at baseline and 12 months. Analysis assessed: (a) validity (structural, convergent and divergent, discriminant); (b) reliability (internal consistency, test‐retest); and (c) responsiveness. RESULTS: An interpretable four‐factor structure was identified: ‘emotional wellbeing’, ‘interpersonal and sexual wellbeing’, ‘socioeconomic wellbeing’ and ‘physical wellbeing’. Moderate to strong convergent validity was found for three subscales of Positive Outcomes and PROQOL (ρ = −0.481 to −0.618, all p < 0.001). Divergent validity was found for total scores with weak ρ (−0.295, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed with worse Positive Outcomes score associated with increasing odds of worse FRAIL group (4.81‐fold, p < 0.001) and PAM‐13 level (2.28‐fold, p < 0.001). Internal consistency for total Positive Outcomes and its factors exceeded the conservative α threshold of 0.6. Test‐retest reliability was established: those with stable PAM‐13 and FRAIL scores also reported median Positive Outcomes change of 0. Improved PROQOL‐HIV score baseline to 12 months was associated with improved Positive Outcomes score (r = −0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Positive Outcomes face and content validity was previously established, and the remaining validity, reliability and responsiveness properties are now demonstrated. The items within the brief 22‐item tool are designed to be actionable by health and social care professionals to facilitate the goal of person‐centred care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93051432022-07-28 Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV Harding, Richard Jones, Christopher Iain Bremner, Stephen Bristowe, Katherine West, Brian Siegert, Richard J. O’Brien, Kelly K. Whetham, Jennifer HIV Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: Despite successful treatment, people living with HIV experience persisting and burdensome multidimensional problems. We aimed to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of Positive Outcomes, a patient‐reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 1392 outpatients in five European countries self‐completed Positive Outcomes, PAM‐13 (patient empowerment), PROQOL‐HIV (quality of life) and FRAIL (frailty) at baseline and 12 months. Analysis assessed: (a) validity (structural, convergent and divergent, discriminant); (b) reliability (internal consistency, test‐retest); and (c) responsiveness. RESULTS: An interpretable four‐factor structure was identified: ‘emotional wellbeing’, ‘interpersonal and sexual wellbeing’, ‘socioeconomic wellbeing’ and ‘physical wellbeing’. Moderate to strong convergent validity was found for three subscales of Positive Outcomes and PROQOL (ρ = −0.481 to −0.618, all p < 0.001). Divergent validity was found for total scores with weak ρ (−0.295, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed with worse Positive Outcomes score associated with increasing odds of worse FRAIL group (4.81‐fold, p < 0.001) and PAM‐13 level (2.28‐fold, p < 0.001). Internal consistency for total Positive Outcomes and its factors exceeded the conservative α threshold of 0.6. Test‐retest reliability was established: those with stable PAM‐13 and FRAIL scores also reported median Positive Outcomes change of 0. Improved PROQOL‐HIV score baseline to 12 months was associated with improved Positive Outcomes score (r = −0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Positive Outcomes face and content validity was previously established, and the remaining validity, reliability and responsiveness properties are now demonstrated. The items within the brief 22‐item tool are designed to be actionable by health and social care professionals to facilitate the goal of person‐centred care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-11 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9305143/ /pubmed/35014143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13224 Text en © 2022 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Harding, Richard
Jones, Christopher Iain
Bremner, Stephen
Bristowe, Katherine
West, Brian
Siegert, Richard J.
O’Brien, Kelly K.
Whetham, Jennifer
Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV
title Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV
title_full Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV
title_fullStr Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV
title_full_unstemmed Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV
title_short Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV
title_sort positive outcomes: validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with hiv
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13224
work_keys_str_mv AT hardingrichard positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT joneschristopheriain positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT bremnerstephen positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT bristowekatherine positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT westbrian positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT siegertrichardj positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT obrienkellyk positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT whethamjennifer positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv
AT positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv