Cargando…
Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV
OBJECTIVES: Despite successful treatment, people living with HIV experience persisting and burdensome multidimensional problems. We aimed to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of Positive Outcomes, a patient‐reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 139...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13224 |
_version_ | 1784752253022765056 |
---|---|
author | Harding, Richard Jones, Christopher Iain Bremner, Stephen Bristowe, Katherine West, Brian Siegert, Richard J. O’Brien, Kelly K. Whetham, Jennifer |
author_facet | Harding, Richard Jones, Christopher Iain Bremner, Stephen Bristowe, Katherine West, Brian Siegert, Richard J. O’Brien, Kelly K. Whetham, Jennifer |
author_sort | Harding, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Despite successful treatment, people living with HIV experience persisting and burdensome multidimensional problems. We aimed to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of Positive Outcomes, a patient‐reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 1392 outpatients in five European countries self‐completed Positive Outcomes, PAM‐13 (patient empowerment), PROQOL‐HIV (quality of life) and FRAIL (frailty) at baseline and 12 months. Analysis assessed: (a) validity (structural, convergent and divergent, discriminant); (b) reliability (internal consistency, test‐retest); and (c) responsiveness. RESULTS: An interpretable four‐factor structure was identified: ‘emotional wellbeing’, ‘interpersonal and sexual wellbeing’, ‘socioeconomic wellbeing’ and ‘physical wellbeing’. Moderate to strong convergent validity was found for three subscales of Positive Outcomes and PROQOL (ρ = −0.481 to −0.618, all p < 0.001). Divergent validity was found for total scores with weak ρ (−0.295, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed with worse Positive Outcomes score associated with increasing odds of worse FRAIL group (4.81‐fold, p < 0.001) and PAM‐13 level (2.28‐fold, p < 0.001). Internal consistency for total Positive Outcomes and its factors exceeded the conservative α threshold of 0.6. Test‐retest reliability was established: those with stable PAM‐13 and FRAIL scores also reported median Positive Outcomes change of 0. Improved PROQOL‐HIV score baseline to 12 months was associated with improved Positive Outcomes score (r = −0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Positive Outcomes face and content validity was previously established, and the remaining validity, reliability and responsiveness properties are now demonstrated. The items within the brief 22‐item tool are designed to be actionable by health and social care professionals to facilitate the goal of person‐centred care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9305143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93051432022-07-28 Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV Harding, Richard Jones, Christopher Iain Bremner, Stephen Bristowe, Katherine West, Brian Siegert, Richard J. O’Brien, Kelly K. Whetham, Jennifer HIV Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: Despite successful treatment, people living with HIV experience persisting and burdensome multidimensional problems. We aimed to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of Positive Outcomes, a patient‐reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice. METHODS: In all, 1392 outpatients in five European countries self‐completed Positive Outcomes, PAM‐13 (patient empowerment), PROQOL‐HIV (quality of life) and FRAIL (frailty) at baseline and 12 months. Analysis assessed: (a) validity (structural, convergent and divergent, discriminant); (b) reliability (internal consistency, test‐retest); and (c) responsiveness. RESULTS: An interpretable four‐factor structure was identified: ‘emotional wellbeing’, ‘interpersonal and sexual wellbeing’, ‘socioeconomic wellbeing’ and ‘physical wellbeing’. Moderate to strong convergent validity was found for three subscales of Positive Outcomes and PROQOL (ρ = −0.481 to −0.618, all p < 0.001). Divergent validity was found for total scores with weak ρ (−0.295, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed with worse Positive Outcomes score associated with increasing odds of worse FRAIL group (4.81‐fold, p < 0.001) and PAM‐13 level (2.28‐fold, p < 0.001). Internal consistency for total Positive Outcomes and its factors exceeded the conservative α threshold of 0.6. Test‐retest reliability was established: those with stable PAM‐13 and FRAIL scores also reported median Positive Outcomes change of 0. Improved PROQOL‐HIV score baseline to 12 months was associated with improved Positive Outcomes score (r = −0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Positive Outcomes face and content validity was previously established, and the remaining validity, reliability and responsiveness properties are now demonstrated. The items within the brief 22‐item tool are designed to be actionable by health and social care professionals to facilitate the goal of person‐centred care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-11 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9305143/ /pubmed/35014143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13224 Text en © 2022 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Harding, Richard Jones, Christopher Iain Bremner, Stephen Bristowe, Katherine West, Brian Siegert, Richard J. O’Brien, Kelly K. Whetham, Jennifer Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV |
title | Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV |
title_full | Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV |
title_fullStr | Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV |
title_short | Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with HIV |
title_sort | positive outcomes: validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person‐centred outcome measure for people with hiv |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardingrichard positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT joneschristopheriain positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT bremnerstephen positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT bristowekatherine positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT westbrian positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT siegertrichardj positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT obrienkellyk positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT whethamjennifer positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv AT positiveoutcomesvalidityreliabilityandresponsivenessofanovelpersoncentredoutcomemeasureforpeoplewithhiv |