Cargando…

Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) battery for predicting injury risk have been widely studied in athletic, military, public service and healthy populations. However, scant research has been carried out in people with disabilities. This study aimed at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanchez‐Lastra, M.A., Moldes, J. Marín, Diz, J.C., Martínez‐Lemos, R.I., Ayán, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12916
_version_ 1784752265035251712
author Sanchez‐Lastra, M.A.
Moldes, J. Marín
Diz, J.C.
Martínez‐Lemos, R.I.
Ayán, C.
author_facet Sanchez‐Lastra, M.A.
Moldes, J. Marín
Diz, J.C.
Martínez‐Lemos, R.I.
Ayán, C.
author_sort Sanchez‐Lastra, M.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) battery for predicting injury risk have been widely studied in athletic, military, public service and healthy populations. However, scant research has been carried out in people with disabilities. This study aimed at identifying the feasibility and reliability of the FMS battery when administered to adults with intellectual disability (ID). METHODS: Adults from a residential and day care centre over 18 years of age, diagnosed with ID and able to follow simple instructions, were included in the study. All participants with behavioural or health problems that prevented the completion of the FMS battery were excluded. All exercises were video recorded to assure proper scoring. Three assessors (one trained and two novices) scored each of the FMS subtests performed separately from the videos. Feasibility was based on completion rates. Reliability of the composite test scores was analysed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: A total of 30 people with ID (mean age: 35.5 ± 7.12 years; 33.3% women) completed all assessments. The battery showed to be feasible, although difficulties when performing two of the subtests were observed among those with moderate and severe ID. Mean total scores from the three assessors ranged from 7.83 to 8.90. An inverse trend was observed indicating that the higher the ID level, the lower the total FMS score. Test–retest reliability was good for the trained assessor (ICC = 0.89) and mostly moderate for both novice assessors (ICC range: 0.60 to 0.76). Moderate to good inter‐rater reliability was observed (ICC range: 0.65 to 0.80). CONCLUSION: The FMS battery is a reliable tool that can be performed by people with ID, albeit with certain difficulties, especially in those with moderate to severe impairment. The battery does not seem to be useful for identifying people with ID at risk of suffering a sport injury. Adequately powered, well‐designed studies are required to determine if the FMS battery is appropriate for identifying changes in functional performance in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93051872022-07-28 Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability Sanchez‐Lastra, M.A. Moldes, J. Marín Diz, J.C. Martínez‐Lemos, R.I. Ayán, C. J Intellect Disabil Res Special Issues BACKGROUND: The feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) battery for predicting injury risk have been widely studied in athletic, military, public service and healthy populations. However, scant research has been carried out in people with disabilities. This study aimed at identifying the feasibility and reliability of the FMS battery when administered to adults with intellectual disability (ID). METHODS: Adults from a residential and day care centre over 18 years of age, diagnosed with ID and able to follow simple instructions, were included in the study. All participants with behavioural or health problems that prevented the completion of the FMS battery were excluded. All exercises were video recorded to assure proper scoring. Three assessors (one trained and two novices) scored each of the FMS subtests performed separately from the videos. Feasibility was based on completion rates. Reliability of the composite test scores was analysed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: A total of 30 people with ID (mean age: 35.5 ± 7.12 years; 33.3% women) completed all assessments. The battery showed to be feasible, although difficulties when performing two of the subtests were observed among those with moderate and severe ID. Mean total scores from the three assessors ranged from 7.83 to 8.90. An inverse trend was observed indicating that the higher the ID level, the lower the total FMS score. Test–retest reliability was good for the trained assessor (ICC = 0.89) and mostly moderate for both novice assessors (ICC range: 0.60 to 0.76). Moderate to good inter‐rater reliability was observed (ICC range: 0.65 to 0.80). CONCLUSION: The FMS battery is a reliable tool that can be performed by people with ID, albeit with certain difficulties, especially in those with moderate to severe impairment. The battery does not seem to be useful for identifying people with ID at risk of suffering a sport injury. Adequately powered, well‐designed studies are required to determine if the FMS battery is appropriate for identifying changes in functional performance in this population. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-07 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9305187/ /pubmed/35128743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12916 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Special Issues
Sanchez‐Lastra, M.A.
Moldes, J. Marín
Diz, J.C.
Martínez‐Lemos, R.I.
Ayán, C.
Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability
title Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability
title_full Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability
title_fullStr Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability
title_short Feasibility and reliability of the Functional Movement Screen battery in adults with intellectual disability
title_sort feasibility and reliability of the functional movement screen battery in adults with intellectual disability
topic Special Issues
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12916
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezlastrama feasibilityandreliabilityofthefunctionalmovementscreenbatteryinadultswithintellectualdisability
AT moldesjmarin feasibilityandreliabilityofthefunctionalmovementscreenbatteryinadultswithintellectualdisability
AT dizjc feasibilityandreliabilityofthefunctionalmovementscreenbatteryinadultswithintellectualdisability
AT martinezlemosri feasibilityandreliabilityofthefunctionalmovementscreenbatteryinadultswithintellectualdisability
AT ayanc feasibilityandreliabilityofthefunctionalmovementscreenbatteryinadultswithintellectualdisability