Cargando…

Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study

Results from real‐world evidence (RWE) from the largest healthcare region in Sweden show low uptake of antiresorptive (AR) treatment, but beneficial effect in those receiving treatment, especially for the composite outcome of hip fracture or death. For RWE studies, Sweden is unique, with virtually c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freyschuss, Bo, Svensson, Maria K., Cars, Thomas, Lindhagen, Lars, Johansson, Helena, Kindmark, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4498
_version_ 1784752273827561472
author Freyschuss, Bo
Svensson, Maria K.
Cars, Thomas
Lindhagen, Lars
Johansson, Helena
Kindmark, Andreas
author_facet Freyschuss, Bo
Svensson, Maria K.
Cars, Thomas
Lindhagen, Lars
Johansson, Helena
Kindmark, Andreas
author_sort Freyschuss, Bo
collection PubMed
description Results from real‐world evidence (RWE) from the largest healthcare region in Sweden show low uptake of antiresorptive (AR) treatment, but beneficial effect in those receiving treatment, especially for the composite outcome of hip fracture or death. For RWE studies, Sweden is unique, with virtually complete coverage of electronic medical records (EMRs) and both regional and national registries, in a universal publicly funded healthcare system. To our knowledge, there is no previous RWE study evaluating the efficacy of AR treatment compared to no AR treatment after fragility fracture, including data on parenteral treatments administered in hospital settings. The Stockholm Real World Management (STORM) study cohort was established in the healthcare region of Stockholm to retrospectively assess the effectiveness of AR treatment after first fragility fracture using the regional EMR system for both hospital and primary care. Between 2012 and 2018, we identified 69,577 fragility fracture episodes among 59,078 patients, men and women, 50 years and older. Of those, 21,141 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria (eligible cohort). From these, the final matched study cohort comprised 9840 fragility fractures (cases receiving AR treatment [n = 1640] and controls not receiving AR treatment [n = 8200]). Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression models with AR treatment as outcome and confounders as independent variables followed by analysis using Cox proportional hazard models. Real world evidence from Sweden's largest healthcare region, comprising a quarter of the Swedish population, show that only 10% of patients receive AR treatment within 1 year after a fragility fracture. Factors associated with not receiving treatment include having a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. In those treated, AR have positive effects particularly on the composite of fracture and death (any fracture/death and hip fracture/death) in individuals matched for all major confounders. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93052222022-07-28 Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study Freyschuss, Bo Svensson, Maria K. Cars, Thomas Lindhagen, Lars Johansson, Helena Kindmark, Andreas J Bone Miner Res Original Articles Results from real‐world evidence (RWE) from the largest healthcare region in Sweden show low uptake of antiresorptive (AR) treatment, but beneficial effect in those receiving treatment, especially for the composite outcome of hip fracture or death. For RWE studies, Sweden is unique, with virtually complete coverage of electronic medical records (EMRs) and both regional and national registries, in a universal publicly funded healthcare system. To our knowledge, there is no previous RWE study evaluating the efficacy of AR treatment compared to no AR treatment after fragility fracture, including data on parenteral treatments administered in hospital settings. The Stockholm Real World Management (STORM) study cohort was established in the healthcare region of Stockholm to retrospectively assess the effectiveness of AR treatment after first fragility fracture using the regional EMR system for both hospital and primary care. Between 2012 and 2018, we identified 69,577 fragility fracture episodes among 59,078 patients, men and women, 50 years and older. Of those, 21,141 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria (eligible cohort). From these, the final matched study cohort comprised 9840 fragility fractures (cases receiving AR treatment [n = 1640] and controls not receiving AR treatment [n = 8200]). Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression models with AR treatment as outcome and confounders as independent variables followed by analysis using Cox proportional hazard models. Real world evidence from Sweden's largest healthcare region, comprising a quarter of the Swedish population, show that only 10% of patients receive AR treatment within 1 year after a fragility fracture. Factors associated with not receiving treatment include having a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. In those treated, AR have positive effects particularly on the composite of fracture and death (any fracture/death and hip fracture/death) in individuals matched for all major confounders. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-02-06 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9305222/ /pubmed/34984745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4498 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Freyschuss, Bo
Svensson, Maria K.
Cars, Thomas
Lindhagen, Lars
Johansson, Helena
Kindmark, Andreas
Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study
title Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study
title_full Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study
title_short Real‐World Effectiveness of Anti‐Resorptive Treatment in Patients With Incident Fragility Fractures—The STORM Cohort—A Swedish Retrospective Observational Study
title_sort real‐world effectiveness of anti‐resorptive treatment in patients with incident fragility fractures—the storm cohort—a swedish retrospective observational study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4498
work_keys_str_mv AT freyschussbo realworldeffectivenessofantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithincidentfragilityfracturesthestormcohortaswedishretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT svenssonmariak realworldeffectivenessofantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithincidentfragilityfracturesthestormcohortaswedishretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT carsthomas realworldeffectivenessofantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithincidentfragilityfracturesthestormcohortaswedishretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lindhagenlars realworldeffectivenessofantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithincidentfragilityfracturesthestormcohortaswedishretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT johanssonhelena realworldeffectivenessofantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithincidentfragilityfracturesthestormcohortaswedishretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kindmarkandreas realworldeffectivenessofantiresorptivetreatmentinpatientswithincidentfragilityfracturesthestormcohortaswedishretrospectiveobservationalstudy