Cargando…

Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies

AIMS: Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1‐preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure‐response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. METHODS: The pha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Amy, Anderson, Kacey, Nelson, Cara, Ni, Liyun, Chuang, Shu‐Min, Bellanti, Francesco, Chang, Peter, Comisar, Craig, Kearney, Brian P., Bartok, Beatrix, Mathias, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15239
_version_ 1784752332320276480
author Meng, Amy
Anderson, Kacey
Nelson, Cara
Ni, Liyun
Chuang, Shu‐Min
Bellanti, Francesco
Chang, Peter
Comisar, Craig
Kearney, Brian P.
Bartok, Beatrix
Mathias, Anita
author_facet Meng, Amy
Anderson, Kacey
Nelson, Cara
Ni, Liyun
Chuang, Shu‐Min
Bellanti, Francesco
Chang, Peter
Comisar, Craig
Kearney, Brian P.
Bartok, Beatrix
Mathias, Anita
author_sort Meng, Amy
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1‐preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure‐response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic exposures used in ER analyses were derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis. The exposure‐efficacy relationships were assessed for efficacy endpoints (ACR20/50/70 and DAS28) over effective area under curve (AUC(eff)), the combined exposures of filgotinib and GS‐829845 (major, active metabolite), with nonlinear logistic regression models developed. Also, a t‐test was performed to compare the exposure between subjects who achieved response and those who did not. For the ER analyses of safety, exposures were examined between subjects who experienced and who did not experience the evaluated safety events, which was conducted separately for filgotinib and GS‐829845. RESULTS: The nonlinear logistic regression showed increasing response with increasing exposure, with exposures at 200 mg dose primarily residing on the curve plateau. Also, AUC(eff) was significantly higher in the subjects who achieved responses compared to those who did not (10 900 vs 9900 h*ng/mL for ACR20, P value < .0001). For exposure‐safety analyses, filgotinib and GS‐829845 exposures were similar irrespective of the presence/absence of the evaluated safety endpoints, indicating no exposure‐safety relationship for common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/laboratory abnormalities and serious TEAEs/infections. CONCLUSIONS: ER analyses confirmed that filgotinib produced more robust therapeutic effects across the exposure range observed at 200 mg once daily compared to lower doses, and collectively with the lack of exposure‐safety relationship, the 200 mg once daily dose was supported for commercialization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9305466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93054662022-07-28 Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies Meng, Amy Anderson, Kacey Nelson, Cara Ni, Liyun Chuang, Shu‐Min Bellanti, Francesco Chang, Peter Comisar, Craig Kearney, Brian P. Bartok, Beatrix Mathias, Anita Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1‐preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure‐response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic exposures used in ER analyses were derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis. The exposure‐efficacy relationships were assessed for efficacy endpoints (ACR20/50/70 and DAS28) over effective area under curve (AUC(eff)), the combined exposures of filgotinib and GS‐829845 (major, active metabolite), with nonlinear logistic regression models developed. Also, a t‐test was performed to compare the exposure between subjects who achieved response and those who did not. For the ER analyses of safety, exposures were examined between subjects who experienced and who did not experience the evaluated safety events, which was conducted separately for filgotinib and GS‐829845. RESULTS: The nonlinear logistic regression showed increasing response with increasing exposure, with exposures at 200 mg dose primarily residing on the curve plateau. Also, AUC(eff) was significantly higher in the subjects who achieved responses compared to those who did not (10 900 vs 9900 h*ng/mL for ACR20, P value < .0001). For exposure‐safety analyses, filgotinib and GS‐829845 exposures were similar irrespective of the presence/absence of the evaluated safety endpoints, indicating no exposure‐safety relationship for common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/laboratory abnormalities and serious TEAEs/infections. CONCLUSIONS: ER analyses confirmed that filgotinib produced more robust therapeutic effects across the exposure range observed at 200 mg once daily compared to lower doses, and collectively with the lack of exposure‐safety relationship, the 200 mg once daily dose was supported for commercialization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-14 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9305466/ /pubmed/35072287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15239 Text en © 2022 Gilead Sciences, Inc. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Meng, Amy
Anderson, Kacey
Nelson, Cara
Ni, Liyun
Chuang, Shu‐Min
Bellanti, Francesco
Chang, Peter
Comisar, Craig
Kearney, Brian P.
Bartok, Beatrix
Mathias, Anita
Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
title Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
title_full Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
title_fullStr Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
title_full_unstemmed Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
title_short Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
title_sort exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite gs‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15239
work_keys_str_mv AT mengamy exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT andersonkacey exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT nelsoncara exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT niliyun exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT chuangshumin exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT bellantifrancesco exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT changpeter exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT comisarcraig exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT kearneybrianp exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT bartokbeatrix exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies
AT mathiasanita exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies