Cargando…
Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies
AIMS: Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1‐preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure‐response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. METHODS: The pha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15239 |
_version_ | 1784752332320276480 |
---|---|
author | Meng, Amy Anderson, Kacey Nelson, Cara Ni, Liyun Chuang, Shu‐Min Bellanti, Francesco Chang, Peter Comisar, Craig Kearney, Brian P. Bartok, Beatrix Mathias, Anita |
author_facet | Meng, Amy Anderson, Kacey Nelson, Cara Ni, Liyun Chuang, Shu‐Min Bellanti, Francesco Chang, Peter Comisar, Craig Kearney, Brian P. Bartok, Beatrix Mathias, Anita |
author_sort | Meng, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1‐preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure‐response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic exposures used in ER analyses were derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis. The exposure‐efficacy relationships were assessed for efficacy endpoints (ACR20/50/70 and DAS28) over effective area under curve (AUC(eff)), the combined exposures of filgotinib and GS‐829845 (major, active metabolite), with nonlinear logistic regression models developed. Also, a t‐test was performed to compare the exposure between subjects who achieved response and those who did not. For the ER analyses of safety, exposures were examined between subjects who experienced and who did not experience the evaluated safety events, which was conducted separately for filgotinib and GS‐829845. RESULTS: The nonlinear logistic regression showed increasing response with increasing exposure, with exposures at 200 mg dose primarily residing on the curve plateau. Also, AUC(eff) was significantly higher in the subjects who achieved responses compared to those who did not (10 900 vs 9900 h*ng/mL for ACR20, P value < .0001). For exposure‐safety analyses, filgotinib and GS‐829845 exposures were similar irrespective of the presence/absence of the evaluated safety endpoints, indicating no exposure‐safety relationship for common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/laboratory abnormalities and serious TEAEs/infections. CONCLUSIONS: ER analyses confirmed that filgotinib produced more robust therapeutic effects across the exposure range observed at 200 mg once daily compared to lower doses, and collectively with the lack of exposure‐safety relationship, the 200 mg once daily dose was supported for commercialization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9305466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93054662022-07-28 Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies Meng, Amy Anderson, Kacey Nelson, Cara Ni, Liyun Chuang, Shu‐Min Bellanti, Francesco Chang, Peter Comisar, Craig Kearney, Brian P. Bartok, Beatrix Mathias, Anita Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: Filgotinib is a potent, oral, JAK1‐preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This report describes exposure‐response (ER) analyses of filgotinib for dose confirmation based on three phase 3 and two phase 2 studies in moderate to severe RA patients. METHODS: The pharmacokinetic exposures used in ER analyses were derived from population pharmacokinetic analysis. The exposure‐efficacy relationships were assessed for efficacy endpoints (ACR20/50/70 and DAS28) over effective area under curve (AUC(eff)), the combined exposures of filgotinib and GS‐829845 (major, active metabolite), with nonlinear logistic regression models developed. Also, a t‐test was performed to compare the exposure between subjects who achieved response and those who did not. For the ER analyses of safety, exposures were examined between subjects who experienced and who did not experience the evaluated safety events, which was conducted separately for filgotinib and GS‐829845. RESULTS: The nonlinear logistic regression showed increasing response with increasing exposure, with exposures at 200 mg dose primarily residing on the curve plateau. Also, AUC(eff) was significantly higher in the subjects who achieved responses compared to those who did not (10 900 vs 9900 h*ng/mL for ACR20, P value < .0001). For exposure‐safety analyses, filgotinib and GS‐829845 exposures were similar irrespective of the presence/absence of the evaluated safety endpoints, indicating no exposure‐safety relationship for common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/laboratory abnormalities and serious TEAEs/infections. CONCLUSIONS: ER analyses confirmed that filgotinib produced more robust therapeutic effects across the exposure range observed at 200 mg once daily compared to lower doses, and collectively with the lack of exposure‐safety relationship, the 200 mg once daily dose was supported for commercialization. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-14 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9305466/ /pubmed/35072287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15239 Text en © 2022 Gilead Sciences, Inc. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Meng, Amy Anderson, Kacey Nelson, Cara Ni, Liyun Chuang, Shu‐Min Bellanti, Francesco Chang, Peter Comisar, Craig Kearney, Brian P. Bartok, Beatrix Mathias, Anita Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies |
title | Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies |
title_full | Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies |
title_fullStr | Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies |
title_short | Exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite GS‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies |
title_sort | exposure‐response relationships for the efficacy and safety of filgotinib and its metabolite gs‐829845 in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis based on phase 2 and phase 3 studies |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9305466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mengamy exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT andersonkacey exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT nelsoncara exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT niliyun exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT chuangshumin exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT bellantifrancesco exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT changpeter exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT comisarcraig exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT kearneybrianp exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT bartokbeatrix exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies AT mathiasanita exposureresponserelationshipsfortheefficacyandsafetyoffilgotinibanditsmetabolitegs829845insubjectswithrheumatoidarthritisbasedonphase2andphase3studies |